Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 699–708

Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions

  • Marco A. Rondon
  • Johannes Lehmann
  • Juan Ramírez
  • Maria Hurtado
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examines the potential, magnitude, and causes of enhanced biological N2 fixation (BNF) by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) through bio-char additions (charcoal, biomass-derived black carbon). Bio-char was added at 0, 30, 60, and 90 g kg−1 soil, and BNF was determined using the isotope dilution method after adding 15N-enriched ammonium sulfate to a Typic Haplustox cropped to a potentially nodulating bean variety (CIAT BAT 477) in comparison to its non-nodulating isoline (BAT 477NN), both inoculated with effective Rhizobium strains. The proportion of fixed N increased from 50% without bio-char additions to 72% with 90 g kg−1 bio-char added. While total N derived from the atmosphere (NdfA) significantly increased by 49 and 78% with 30 and 60 g kg−1 bio-char added to soil, respectively, NdfA decreased to 30% above the control with 90 g kg−1 due to low total biomass production and N uptake. The primary reason for the higher BNF with bio-char additions was the greater B and Mo availability, whereas greater K, Ca, and P availability, as well as higher pH and lower N availability and Al saturation, may have contributed to a lesser extent. Enhanced mycorrhizal infections of roots were not found to contribute to better nutrient uptake and BNF. Bean yield increased by 46% and biomass production by 39% over the control at 90 and 60 g kg−1 bio-char, respectively. However, biomass production and total N uptake decreased when bio-char applications were increased to 90 g kg−1. Soil N uptake by N-fixing beans decreased by 14, 17, and 50% when 30, 60, and 90 g kg−1 bio-char were added to soil, whereas the C/N ratios increased from 16 to 23.7, 28, and 35, respectively. Results demonstrate the potential of bio-char applications to improve N input into agroecosystems while pointing out the needs for long-term field studies to better understand the effects of bio-char on BNF.

Keywords

Biological N fixation Boron Charcoal Molybdenum Mycorrhiza 15

References

  1. Bergmann W (1986) Ernährungsstörungen bei Kulturpflanzen. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, JenaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird MI, Moyo C, Vecnendaal EM, Lloyd J, Frost P (1999) Stability of elemental carbon in a savanna soil. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodrick SJ, Sakala MK, Giller KE (1992) Molybdenum reserves of seed, and growth and N2 fixation by Phaseolus vulgaris L. Biol Fertil Soils 13:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campo RJ, Lantmann AF (1998) Effects of micronutrients on biological nitrogen fixation and soyabean productivity. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 33:1245–1253Google Scholar
  5. Carpena R, Esteban E, Sarro M, Peñaloza J, Garate A, Lucena J, Zornoza P (2000) Boron and calcium distribution in nitrogen fixing pea plants. Plant Sci 151:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chidumayo EN (1994) Effects of wood carbonization on soil and initial development of seedlings in miombo woodland, Zambia. For Ecol Manage 70:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danso SKA, Hardarson G, Zapata F (1993) Misconceptions and practical problems in use of 15N soil enrichment techniques for estimation N2 fixation. Plant Soil 152:25–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Oliveira WS, Meinhardt LW, Sessitsch A, Tsai SM (1998) Analysis of Phaseolus–Rhizobium interactions in a subsistence farming system. Plant Soil 204:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gehring C (2003) The role of biological nitrogen fixation in secondary and primary forests of Central Amazonia. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Giller KE (2001) Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems, 2nd edn. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberg E (1985) Black carbon in the environment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta U (1991) Boron, molybdenum and selenium status in different plant parts in forage legumes and vegetable crops. J Plant Nutr 14:613–621Google Scholar
  14. Iswaran V, Jauhri K, Sen A (1980) Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong soybean and pea. Soil Biol Biochem 12:191–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jongruaysup S, Dell B, Bell R, O’Hara G, Bradley S (1997) Effect of molybdenum and inorganic nitrogen on molybdenum redistribution in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) with particular reference to seed fill. Ann Bot 79:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kipe-Nolt J, Giller K (1993) A field evaluation using 15N isotope dilution method of lines of phaseolus vulgaris L. bred for increased nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 134:178Google Scholar
  17. Lal JK, Mishra B (1998) Flyash as a carrier for Rhizobium inoculant. J Res (Birsa Agric Univ) 10:191–192Google Scholar
  18. Lehmann J, da Silva JP Jr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003a) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehmann J, Kern DC, German LA, McCann J, Martins GC, Moreira A (2003b) Soil fertility and production potential. In: Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: origin, properties, management. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  20. Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Woods WI (2003c) Amazonian Dark Earths: origin, properties, management. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsubara YI, Harada T, Yakuwa T (1995) Effect of inoculation density of VAM fungal spores and addition of carbonized material to bed soil on growth of Welsh onion seedlings. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 64:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIntosh JL (1969) Bray and Morgan soil test extractants modified for testing acid soils from different parent materials. Agron J 61:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikan CJ, Abrams MD (1995) Altered forest composition and soil properties of historic charcoal hearths in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Can J For Res 25:687–696Google Scholar
  24. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nehls T (2002) Fertility improvement of a Terra Firme Oxisol in Central Amazonia by charcoal applications. MSc thesis, University of Bayreuth, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  26. Nishio M, Okano S (1991) Stimulation of the growth of alfalfa and infection of mycorrhizal fungi by the application of charcoal. Bull Natl Grassl Res Inst 45:61–71Google Scholar
  27. Oguntunde P, Fosu M, Ajayi A, Giesen N (2004) Effect of charcoal production on maize yield, chemical properties and texture of soil. Biol Fertil Soil 39:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pandher MS, Gupta RP, Bhandal BK, Gupta SK, (1993) Studies on growth and survival of Rhizobium isolates in different carriers. Indian J Ecol 20:141–146Google Scholar
  29. Popescu A (1998) Contributions and limitations to symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Romania. Plant Soil 204:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rao I, Miles J, Granobles J (1998) Differences in tolerance to infertile acid soil stress among germplasm accessions and genetic recombinants of the tropical forage grass genus, Brachiaria. Field Crops Res 59:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saito M, Marumoto T (2002) Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: the status quo in Japan and the future prospects. Plant Soil 244:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt MWI, Noack AG (2000) Black carbon in soils and sediments: analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14:777–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sieverding E (1983) Manual of methods for laboratory studies of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza. CIAT Technical Document. Cali, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh SP, Teran H, Munoz CG, Osorno JM, Takegami JC, Thung MD (2003) Low soil fertility tolerance in landraces and improved common bean genotypes. Crop Sci 43:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith BE (1977) The structure and function of nitrogenase: a review of the evidence for the role of molybdenum. J Less-Common Met 54:465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Sylvester-Bradley R, De Oliveira LA, De Podestá Filho JA, St. John TV (1980) Nodulation of legumes, nitrogenase activity of roots and occurrence of nitrogen-fixing Azospirillum spp. in representative soils of Central Amazonia. Agro-Ecosyst 6:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tryon EH (1948) Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecol Monogr 18:81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vásquez-Arroyo J, Sessitsch A, Martínez E, Peña-Cabriales JJ (1998) Nitrogen fixation and nodule occupancy by the native strains of Rhizobium on different cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil 204:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC (1998) The charcoal effect in boreal forest: mechanisms and ecological consequences. Oecologia 115:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young MJ, Johnson JE, Abrams MD (1996) Vegetative and edaphic characteristics on relic charcoal hearths in the Appalachian Mountains. Vegetatio 125:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Wardle DA (1996) Key ecological function of charcoal from wildfire in the boreal forest. Oikos 77:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zasoski RJ, Burau RG (1977) A rapid nitric-perchloric acid digestion method for multielement tissue analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 3:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco A. Rondon
    • 1
    • 3
  • Johannes Lehmann
    • 2
  • Juan Ramírez
    • 1
  • Maria Hurtado
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)CaliColombia
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.International Development Research CentreOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations