Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 621–630 | Cite as

Nitrogen dynamics and microbial response in soil amended with either olive pulp or its by-products after biogas production

  • P. Gioacchini
  • L. M. Manici
  • N. A. Ramieri
  • C. Marzadori
  • C. Ciavatta
Original Paper

Abstract

Olive pulp (OP), the residual material of a two-phase olive oil extraction system, and effluents from hydrogen (EH2) and methane (ECH4) production, have been evaluated as soil amendments particularly for their impact on soil mineral nitrogen (N) dynamics, gross N mineralization, and soil microbial biomass N (Nmic). Both N transformation and microbial growth were mainly influenced by the amount and quality of added organic carbon (C). Both OP and EH2, which contain more carbohydrates and lipids than polyphenolic compounds, stimulated NO3 immobilization during the early incubation period and increased Nmic, saprophytic fungi, and N mineralization. On the contrary, soil amended with ECH4, which is characterized by the lowest C content but the highest content of polyphenolic compounds, behaved as the control; neither NO3 immobilization nor microbial growth were observed and gross N mineralization was stimulated only at the beginning of the incubation period. Bacterial plate count was significantly correlated with direct bacterial count and fungal count was correlated with Nmic. Therefore, it is suggested that both bacterial and fungal plate counts may be used as indicators of the overall bacterial and fungal populations inhabiting soil, respectively. The knowledge of the impact of these materials on soil N dynamics is crucial for their correct use in agriculture because it has been shown that NO3 availability can be strongly influenced by the addition of different amounts and quality of organic amendment.

Keywords

Olive pulp Microbial biomass N Bacterial count Fungal count NO3 immobilization Gross mineralization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported with funds from the European Community, project: Integrated biological treatment and agricultural reuse of olive mill effluents with the concurrent recovery of energy sources (contract no. QLK5-CT-2002-02344). The authors gratefully thank Dr. Daniela Montecchio for the TG-DTA measurements.

References

  1. Aerts R, De Caluwe H (1997) Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78:244–260Google Scholar
  2. Alburquerque JA, Gonzalvez J, Garcia D, Cegarra J (2004) Agrochemical characterisation of “alperujo”, a solid by-product of the two-phase centrifugation method for olive oil extraction. Bioresour Technol 91:195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MK, Jensen LS (2001) Low soil temperature effects on short-term gross N mineralization-immobilization turnover after incorporation of a green manure. Soil Biol Biochem 33:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barraclough D (1991) The use of mean pool abundances to interpret 15N tracer experiments. I. Theory. Plant Soil 131:89–96Google Scholar
  5. Berg B, Staaf H (1980) Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. In: T Persson (ed) Structure and function of northern Coniferous forests. An ecosystem study. Ecol Bull, Stockholm, pp 373–390Google Scholar
  6. Box JD (1983) Investigation of the Folin–Ciocalteau phenol reagent for the determination of polyphenolic substances in natural waters. Water Res 17:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil N: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger M, Jackson LE (2003) Microbial immobilization of ammonium nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 35:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabrera ML, Beare MH (1993) Alkaline persulfate oxidation for determining total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciavatta C, Govi M (1993) Use of insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone and isoelectric focusing in the study of humic substances in soils and organic wastes: a review. J Chromatogr A 643:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciavatta C, Vittori Antisari L and Sequi P (1989) Determination of organic carbon in soils and fertilizers. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20:759–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cobo JG, Barrios E, Kass DCL, Thomas RJ (2002) Decomposition and nutrient release by green manures in tropic hillside agroecosystem. Plant Soil 240:331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corre MD, Schnabel RR, Stout WL (2001) Spatial and seasonal variation of gross nitrogen transformations and microbial biomass in a Northeast US grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 34:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cramér H (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Dell’Abate MT, Benedetti A, Trinchera A, Dazzi C (2002) Humic substances along the profile of two Typic Haploxerert. Geoderma 107:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dazzo F, Liu J, TrioneD, Glagoleva O, Marshal E, Zurdo J, Hammoud H (2003) CMEIAS© Ver.1.27 Operator Manual 55 p MSU Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhiangra OD, Sinclair JB (1986) Basic Plant Pathology Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL pp 179–189Google Scholar
  18. Eberhardt U, Apel G, Joergensen RG (1996) Effects of direct chloroform fumigation on suspended cells of 14C and 32P labelled bacteria and fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 28:677–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flaig W, Beutelspacher H, Rietz E (1975) Chemical composition and physical properties of humic substances. In: Gieseking JE (ed) Soil components. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 119–126Google Scholar
  20. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Cadish G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature plant. Litter quality and decomposition. UK University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  21. Janshammermeister DC, McGill WB, Jensen TL (1994) Dynamics of 15N in 2 soil-plant systems following incorporation of 10%-bloom and full-bloom field pea. Can J Soil Sci 74:99–107Google Scholar
  22. Jensen ES (1994) Dynamics of mature pea residue nitrogen turnover in unplanted soil under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 26:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jensen LS, Mueller T, Magid J, Nielsen EN (1997) Temporal variation of C and N mineralization, microbial biomass and extractable organic pools in soil after oilseed rape straw incorporation in the field. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1043–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joergensen RG, Mueller T (1996) The fumigation–extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the k(EN) value. Soil Biol Biochem 28:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones JM, Richard BN (1977) Effect of reforestation on turnover of 15N-labeled nitrate and ammonium in relation to changes in soil microflora. Soil Biol Biochem 9:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller DR, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chemical and microbiological methods. Agronomy 9(2), ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 643–698Google Scholar
  27. Khan SA, Mulvaney RL, Brooks PD (1998) Diffusion methods for automated nitrogen-15 analysis using acidified disks. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:406–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhad RC, Singh A, Eriksson KE (1997) Microorganisms and enzyme involved in the degradation of plant fill cell walls. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 57:45–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu J, Dazzo FB, Glagoleva O, Yu B, Jain AK (2001) CMEIAS: computer-aided system for the image analysis of bacterial morphotypes in microbial communities. Microb Ecol 41:173–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Luxhøi J, Brockhoff PB (2004) Analysis of variance on gross nitrogen mineralization data. Soil Biol Biochem 36:735–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manici LM, Caputo F, Babini V (2004) Effect of green manure on Pythium spp. population and microbial communities in intensive cropping systems. Plant Soil 263:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Müller C, Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ, Ottow JCG, Jäger H-J (2003) Ammonium immobilisation during chloroform fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 35:651–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nastri A, Ramieri NA, Abdayem R, Piccaglia R, Marzadori C, Ciavatta C (2006) Olive pulp and its effluents suitability for soil amendment. J Hazard Mater (in press)Google Scholar
  35. Nelson PE, Tousson TA, Marasas WFO (1983) Fusarium species. An illustrated manual for identification. Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania, pp 190Google Scholar
  36. Nishio T, Komada M, Arao T, Kanamori T (2001) Simultaneous determination of transformation rates of nitrate in soil. JARQ Jpn Agric Res Q 35:11–17Google Scholar
  37. Paul EA, Clark FE (1997) Soil microbiology and biochemistry, 2nd edn. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  38. Peuravouri J, Paaso N, Pihlaja K (1999) Kinetic study of the thermal degradation of lake aquatic humic matter by thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochim Acta 325:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan D, Lawrence H, Prenzler PD, Antolovich M and Robards K (2001) Recovery of phenolic compounds from Olea europaea. Anal Chim Acta 445:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Recous S, Aita C, Mary B (1999) In situ changes in gross N transformations in bare soil after addition of straw. Soil Biol Biochem 31:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rice CW, Tiedje JM (1989) Regulation of nitrate assimilation by ammonium in soils and in isolated soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 21:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruzicka S, Edgerton D, Norman N, Hill T (2000) The utility of ergosterol as a bioindicator of fungi in temperate soils. Soil Biol Biochem 32:989–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Samson RA, van Reenen-Hoekstra ES (1988) Introduction to food-borne pathogens, 3rd edn. Centraalbureau vor Schimmelcultures, pp 299Google Scholar
  44. Sheppard JD, Forgeron DW (1987) Differential thermogravimetry of peat fractions. Fuel 66:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shindo H, Nishio T (2005) Immobilization and remineralization of N following addition of wheat straw into soil: determination of gross N transformation rates by 15N-ammonium isotope dilution technique. Soil Biol Biochem 37:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K (1999) Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1350–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skiadas IV, Gavala HN, Lyberatos G, Pistikopoulos E, Ciavatta C, Ahring BK (2004) Integrated biological treatment and agricultural reuse of olive mill effluents with the concurrent recovery of energy sources (BIOTROLL). In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Anaerobic Digestion, Montreal, Canada, 29th August–2nd September 2004, pp 1833–1837Google Scholar
  48. Sorensen P (2001) Short-term nitrogen transformations in soil amended with animal manure. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1211–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thornton HC (1922) On the development of standardizing agar medium for counting soil bacteria with especial regard to repression of spreading colonies. Ann Appl Biol 9:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tian G, Kang BT, Brussaard L (1992b) Effects of chemical composition on N, Ca and Mg release during incubation of leaves from selected agroforestry and fallow plant species. Biogeochemistry 16:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Vuuren MMI, Berendse F, Visser de W (1993) Species and site differences in the decomposition of litters and roots from wet heathlands. Can J Bot 71:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van der Wal A, van Veen JA, Smant W, Boschkler HTS, Bloem J, Kardol P, van der Putten WH, de Boer W (2006) Fungal biomass development in a chronosequence of land abandonment. Soil Biol Biochem 38:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Gioacchini
    • 1
  • L. M. Manici
    • 2
  • N. A. Ramieri
    • 1
  • C. Marzadori
    • 1
  • C. Ciavatta
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie AgroambientaliUniversità di BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Agriculture Research Council (C.R.A.)I.S.C.I.BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations