Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 247–257 | Cite as

Soil microbial, fungal, and nematode responses to soil fumigation and cover crops under potato production

  • H. P. Collins
  • A. Alva
  • R. A. Boydston
  • R. L. Cochran
  • P. B. Hamm
  • A. McGuire
  • E. Riga
Original Paper

Abstract

Sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate (metam sodium) and 1,3 dichloropropene are widely used in potato production for the control of soil-borne pathogens, weeds, and plant parasitic nematodes that reduce crop yield and quality. Soil fumigation with metam sodium has been shown in microcosm studies to significantly reduce soil microbial populations and important soil processes such as C and N mineralization. However, few published data report the impact of metam sodium on microbial populations and activities in potato production systems under field conditions. Fall-planted white mustard (Brassica hirta) and sudangrass (Sorghum sudanense) cover crops may serve as an alternative to soil fumigation. The effect of metam sodium and cover crops was determined on soil microbial populations, soil-borne pathogens (Verticillium dahliae, Pythium spp., and Fusarium spp.), free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes, and C and N mineralization potentials under potato production on five soil types in the Columbia Basin of Eastern Washington. Microbial biomass C was 8–23% greater in cover crop treatments compared to those fumigated with metam sodium among the soil types tested. Replacing fumigation with cover crops did not significantly affect C or N mineralization potentials. Cumulative N mineralized over a 49-day laboratory incubation averaged 18 mg NO3-N kg−1 soil across all soil types and treatments. There was a general trend for N mineralized from fumigated treatments to be lower than cover-cropped treatments. Soil fungal populations and free-living nematode levels were significantly lowered in fumigated field trials compared to cover-cropped treatments. Fumigation among the five soil types significantly reduced Pythium spp. by 97%, Fusarium spp. by 84%, and V. dahliae by 56% compared to the mustard cover crop treatment. The percentage of bacteria and fungi surviving fumigation was greater for fine- than coarse-textured soils, suggesting physical protection of organisms within the soil matrix or a reduced penetration and distribution of the fumigants. This suggests the potential need for a higher rate of fumigant to be used in fine-textured soils to obtain comparable reductions in soil-borne pathogens.

Keywords

Soil fumigation Cover crops Microbial populations Pathogens 

References

  1. Abawi GS, Widmer TL (2000) Impact of soil health management practices on soilborne pathogens, nematodes and root diseases of vegetable crops. Appl Soil Ecol 15:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker JO, Hepfer CA, Yuen GY, Van Gundy SD, Schroth MN, Hancock JG, Weinhold AR, Bowman T (1990) Effect of rhizobacteria and metham-sodium on growth and root micro-flora of celery cultivars. Phytopathology 80:206–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Yephet, Frank D (1984) Optimization of the metham-sodium dose in controlling Verticillium dahliar in potato. Phytoparasitica 12:203–205Google Scholar
  4. Borek V, Morra MJ, Brown PD, McCaffrey JP (1995) Transformation of the glucosinolate-derived allelochemicals allyl isothiocyanate and allyl nitrile in soil. J Agric Food Chem 43:1935–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boydston R, Hang A (1995) Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 9:669–675Google Scholar
  6. Boydston RA, Vaughn SF (2002) Aternative weed management systems control weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol 16:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown PD, Morra MJ (1995) Glucosinolate-containing plant tissues as bioherbicides. J Agric Food Chem 42:3070–3074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown PD, Morra MJ (1997) Control of soil-borne plant pests using glucosinolate-containing plants. Adv Agron 61:167–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buhler DD, Kohler KA, Foster MS (2001) Corn, soybean, and weed responses to spring-seeded smother plants. J Sustain Agric 18:63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conn EE (1981) Biosynthesis of cyanogenic glycosides. In: Vennesland B, Con EE, Knowles CJ, Westley J, Wissing F (eds) Cyanide in biology. Academic, NewYork, NY, USA, pp 183–196Google Scholar
  11. Davis JR, Huisman OC, Westermann DT, Sorensen LR, Schnieder AT, Stark JC (1994) The influence of cover crops on the suppression of Verticillium wilt of potato. In: Zehnder GW, Powelson ML, Jansson, RK, Raman KV (eds) Advances in potato pest biology and management. APS Press, St Paul, MN, USA, pp 332–341Google Scholar
  12. Doran JW, Smith MS (1991) Role of cover crops in nitrogen cycling. In: Hargrove WL (ed) Cover crops for clean water. Soil Water Conserv Soc, Ankeny, IA, pp 85–90Google Scholar
  13. Elliott ML, Des Jardin EA (2001) Fumigation effects on bacterial populations in new golf course bermudagrass putting greens. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1841–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fortuner R (1991) Field sampling and preparation of nematodes for optic microscopy. In: Nickle WR (ed) Manual of agricultural nematology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 75–123Google Scholar
  15. Hamm PB, Ingham RE, Jaeger JR, Swanson WH, Volker, KC (2003) Soil fumigant effects on three genera of potential soilborne pathogenic fungi and their effect on potato yield in the Columbia Basin of Oregon. Plant Dis 87:1449–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen EM, Myrold DD, Hamm PB (1990) Effects of soil fumigation and cover crops on potential pathogens, microbial activity, nitrogen availability, and seedling quality in conifer nurseries. Phytopathology 80:698–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibekwe AM, Papiernik SK, Gan J, Yates SR, Yang CH, Crowley DE (2001) Impact of soil fumigants on soil microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3245–3257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ICI (1992) Vapam product guide. ICI Agric Prod, Wilmington, DEGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingham RE, Hamm PB, Williams RE, Swanson WH (2000) Control of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in potato with fumigant and nonfumigant nematicides. J Nematol 32:556–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil-I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol Biochem 8:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson KB, Apple JD, Powelson ML (1988) Spatial patterns of Verticillium dahliae propagules in potato field soils in Oregon's Columbia Basin. Plant Dis 72:484–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lal R, Regnier E, Eckert DJ, Edwards DM, Hammond R (1991) Expectations of cover crops for sustainable agriculture. In: Hargrove WL (ed) Cover crops for clean water. Soil Water Conserv Soc, Ankeny, IA, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  23. Lewis JA, Papavizas GC (1974) Effect of volatiles from decomposing plant tissues on pigmentation, growth, and survival of Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Sci 118:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macalady JL, Fuller ME, Scow KM (1998) Effects of metam sodium fumigation on soil microbial activity and community structure. J Environ Qual 27:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magyarosy AC, Matthews WC, May DM (1988) Effects of metam-sodium applied by drip irrigation on root-knot nematodes, Pythium ultimum, and Fusarium spp. in soil and on carrot and tomato roots. Plant Dis 72:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGuire A (2002) Mustard. http://www.grant-adams.wsu.edu
  27. McGuire AM (2003) Mustard green manures replace fumigant and improve infiltration in potato cropping system. J Appl Crop Sci, Crop Manage 22Google Scholar
  28. Mendes IC, Bandick AK, Dick RP, Bottomley PJ (1999) Microbial biomass and activities in soil aggregates affected by winter cover crops. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mojtahedi H, Santo GS, Wilson JH, Hang AN (1993a) Managing Meloidogyne chitwoodi on potato with rapeseed as green manure. Plant Dis 77:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mojtahedi H, Santo GS, Ingham RE (1993b) Suppression of Meloidogyne chitwoodi with sudangrass cultivars as green manure. J Nematol 25:303–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Potter MJ, Davies K, Rathjen AJ (1998) Suppressive impact of glucosinolates in Brassica vegetative tissues in root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. J Chem Ecol 24:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riga E, Mojtahedi H, Ingham RE, Mcguire AM (2003) Green manure amendments and management of root knot nematodes on potato in the Pacific Northwest of USA. Nematology Monographs and Perspectives 2:151–158Google Scholar
  33. Shennan C (1992) Cover crops, nitrogen cycling, and soil properties in semi-irrigated vegetable production systems. HortScience 27:749–754Google Scholar
  34. Sinha AP, Agnihorti VP, Singh K (1979) Effect of soil fumigation with Vapam on the dynamics of soil microflora and their related biochemical activity. Plant Soil 53:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smelt JH, Leistra M (1974) Conversion of metham-sodium to methyl isothiocyanate and basic data on the behavior of methyl isothiocyanate in soil. Pestic Sci 5:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smolinska U, Knudsen GR, Morra MJ (1997) Inhibition of Aphanomyces euteiches f. sp. pisi by volatiles produced by hydrolysis of Brassics napus seed meal. Plant Dis 81:288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Toyota K, Ritz K, Kuninaga S, Kimura M (1999) Impact of fumigation with metam sodium upon soil microbial community structure in two Japanese soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:203–207Google Scholar
  38. USDA-NAS (2002) Agricultural Statistics. http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agstats.htm
  39. Warton B, Matthiessen JN, Roper MM (2001) The soil organisms responsible for enhanced biodegradation of metam sodium. Biol Fertil Soils 34:264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weinert T, Pan W, Moneymaker M, Santo G, Stevens R (1995) Green-manured winter cover crops in irrigated potato rotations. Proc Wash State Potato Conf and Trade Show, Moses Lake, WA, ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Widmer TL, Abawi GS (2002) Relationship between levels of cyanide in Sudangrass hybrids incorporated into soil and suppression of Meloidogyne hapla. J Nematol 34:16–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zibilske LM (1994) Carbon mineralization. In: Mickelson SH (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 835–864Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. P. Collins
    • 1
  • A. Alva
    • 1
  • R. A. Boydston
    • 1
  • R. L. Cochran
    • 1
  • P. B. Hamm
    • 2
  • A. McGuire
    • 3
  • E. Riga
    • 4
  1. 1.USDA-ARSVegetable and Forage Research UnitProsserUSA
  2. 2.Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension CenterOregon State UniversityHermistonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Sustaining Agri. and Nat. ResourcesWashington State UniversityEphrataUSA
  4. 4.Irrigated Agricultural Research and Extension CenterWashington State UniversityProsserUSA

Personalised recommendations