Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 188–193 | Cite as

Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by a gfp-tagged Azospirillum lipoferum

  • Macario Bacilio
  • Hilda Rodriguez
  • Manuel Moreno
  • Juan-Pablo Hernandez
  • Yoav Bashan
Original Paper

Abstract

Root colonization and mitigation of NaCl stress on wheat seedlings were studied by inoculating seeds with Azospirillum lipoferum JA4∷ngfp15 tagged with the green fluorescent protein gene (gfp). Colonization of wheat roots under 80 and 160 mM NaCl stress was similar to root colonization with this bacterial species under non-saline conditions, that is, single cells and small aggregates were mainly located in the root hair zone. These salt concentrations had significant inhibitory effects on development of seedlings, but not on growth in culture of gfp-A. lipoferum JA4∷ngfp15. Reduced plant growth (height and dry weight of leaves and roots) under continuous irrigation with 160 mM NaCl was ameliorated by bacterial inoculation with gfp-A. lipoferum JA4∷ngfp15. Inoculation of plants subjected to continuous irrigation with 80 mM NaCl or to a single application of either NaCl concentration (80 or 160 mM NaCl) did not mitigate salt stress. This study indicates that, under high NaCl concentration, inoculation with modified A. lipoferum reduced the deleterious effects of NaCl; colonization patterns on roots were unaffected and the genetic marker did not induce undesirable effects on the interaction between the bacterium and the plants.

Keywords

Azospirillum gfp Plant growth-promoting bacteria PGPR Salt stress mitigation 

References

  1. Assmus B, Hutzler P, Kirchhof G, Amann R, Lawrence JR, Hartmann A (1995) In situ localization of Azospirillum brasilense in the rhizosphere of wheat with fluorescently labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and scanning confocal laser microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1013–1019Google Scholar
  2. Bacilio M, Vazquez P, Bashan Y (2003) Alleviation of noxious effects of cattle ranch composts on wheat seed germination by inoculation with Azospirillum spp. Biol Fertil Soils 38:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bashan Y (1986) Significance of timing and level of inoculation with rhizosphere bacteria on wheat plants. Soil Biol Biochem 18:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bashan Y, Holguin G (1997) Azospirillum-plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances (1990–1996). Can J Microbiol 43:103–121Google Scholar
  5. Bashan Y, Holguin G, Lifshitz R (1993) Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: Glick BR, Thompson JE (eds) Methods in plant molecular biology and biotechnology. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 331–345Google Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, Moreno M, Troyo E (2000) Growth promotion of the seawater-irrigated oilseed halophyte Salicornia bigelovii inoculated with mangrove rhizosphere bacteria and halotolerant Azospirillum spp. Biol Fertil Soils 32:265–272Google Scholar
  7. Bashan Y, Hernandez JP, Leyva LA, Bacilio M (2002) Alginate microbeads as inoculant carrier for plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 35:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi YJ, Gal SW (1998) Effect of osmoprotectants on the growth and nitrogenase activity of Rhizobium and Azospirillum under osmotic stress. Agric Chem Biotechnol 41:53–59Google Scholar
  9. Cordovilla MP, Ocaña A, Ligero F, Lluch C (1996) Growth and symbiotic performance of faba bean inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae strains tolerant to salt. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 42:133–140Google Scholar
  10. Cordovilla MP, Berrido SI, Ligero F, Lluch C (1999) Rhizobium strain effects on the growth and nitrogen assimilation in Pisum sativum and Vicia faba plant growth under salt stress. J Plant Physiol 154:127–131Google Scholar
  11. Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (1997) Shoot growth and water status in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat seedlings grown under osmotic and salt stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem 35:939–944Google Scholar
  12. Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (1998) Water relations in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat seedlings under osmotic stress. Can J Bot 7:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dandie CE, Thomas SM, McClure NC (2001) Comparison of a range of green fluorescent protein-tagging vectors for monitoring a microbial inoculant in soil. Lett Appl Microbiol 32:26–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Errampalli D, Leung K, Cassidy MB, Kostrzynska M, Blears M, Lee H, Trevors JT (1999) Applications of the green fluorescent protein as a molecular marker in environmental microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods 35:187–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer S, Rivarola V, Mori G (1999) Saline stress alters the gene expression of Azospirillum brasilense Cd. Microbios 100:83–88Google Scholar
  16. Fischer S, Rivarola V, Mori G (2000) Colonization of wheat by Azospirillum brasilense Cd is impaired by saline stress. Plant Soil 225:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamaoui B, Abbadi JM, Burdman S, Rashid A, Sarig S, Okon Y (2001) Effects of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and faba beans (Vicia faba) under different growth conditions. Agronomie 21:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamdia MA, El-Komy HM (1997) Effect of salinity, gibberellic acid and Azospirillum inoculation on growth and nitrogen uptake of Zea mays. Biol Plant 40:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartmann A, Prabhu SR, Galinski EA (1991) Osmotolerance of diazotrophic rhizosphere bacteria. Plant Soil 137:105–109Google Scholar
  20. Holguin G, Bashan Y (1996) Nitrogen-fixation by Azospirillum brasilense Cd is promoted when co-cultured with a mangrove rhizosphere bacterium (Staphylococcus sp.). Soil Biol Biochem 28:1651–1660Google Scholar
  21. Jacoud C, Faure D, Wadoux P, Bally R (1998) Development of a strain-specific probe to follow inoculated Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1 under field conditions and enhancement of maize root development by inoculation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 27:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jofré E, Fischer S, Rivarola V, Balegno H, Mori G (1998a) Saline stress affects the attachment of Azospirillum brasilense Cd to maize and wheat roots. Can J Microbiol 44:416–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jofré E, Rivarola V, Balegno H, Mori G (1998b) Differential gene expression in Azospirillum brasilense Cd under saline stress. Can J Microbiol 44:929–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puente ME, Bashan Y (1993) Effect on inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense strains on the germination and seedlings growth of the giant columnar Cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei). Symbiosis 15:49–60Google Scholar
  25. Puente ME, Holguin G, Glick BR, Bashan Y (1999) Root-surface colonization of black mangrove seedlings by Azospirillum halopraeferens and Azospirillum brasilense in seawater. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:283–292Google Scholar
  26. Qadir M, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G (2000) Amelioration strategies for saline soils: a review. Land Degrad Dev 11:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramos HJO, Roncato-Maccari LDB, Souza EM, Soares-Ramos JRL, Hungria M, Pedrosa FO (2002) Monitoring Azospirillum-wheat interactions using the gfp and gusA genes constitutively expressed from a new broad-host range vector. J Biotechnol 97:243–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Reinhold B, Hurek T, Fendrik I, Pot B, Gillis M, Kersters K, Thielemans S, De Ley J (1987) Azospirillum halopraeferens sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing organism associated with roots of Kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth). Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:43–51Google Scholar
  29. Rivarola V, Castro S, Mori G, Jofré E, Fabra A, Garnica R, Balegno H (1998) Response of Azospirillum brasilense Cd to sodium chloride stress. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Gen Microbiol 73:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodríguez H, Bashan Y (2002) Tagging the plant-growth promoting bacterium Azospirillum with green fluorescent protein genes for environmental studies (abstract). The 6th international symposium on environmental biotechnology and the 4th international symposium on cleaner bioprocesses and sustainable development, Veracruz, Mexico, June 9–12, 2002Google Scholar
  31. Saleena LM, Rangarajan S, Nair S (2002) Diversity of Azospirillum strains isolated from rice plants grown in saline and nonsaline sites of coastal agricultural ecosystem. Microbial Ecol 44:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sarig S, Okon Y, Blum A (1990) Promotion of leaf area development and yield in Sorghum bicolor inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Symbiosis 9:235–245Google Scholar
  33. Shannon MC, Grieve CM (1999) Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 78:5–38Google Scholar
  34. Tripathi AK, Mishra BM, Tripathi P (1998) Salinity stress responses in the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Azospirillum spp. J Biosci 23:463–471Google Scholar
  35. Unge A, Jansson J (2001) Monitoring population size, activity, and distribution of gfp-luzAB-tagged Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 during colonization of wheat. Microb Ecol 41:290–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vande Broek A, Michiels J, Van Gool A, Vanderleyden J (1993) Spatial-temporal colonization pattern of Azospirillum brasilense on the wheat root surface and expression of the bacterial nifH gene during association. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:592–600Google Scholar
  37. Xi C, Lambrecht M, Vanderleyden J, Michiels J (1999) Bi-functional gfp- and gusA-containing mini Tn5 transposon derivatives for combined gene expression and bacterial localization studies. J Microbiol Methods 35:85–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Macario Bacilio
    • 1
  • Hilda Rodriguez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manuel Moreno
    • 1
  • Juan-Pablo Hernandez
    • 1
  • Yoav Bashan
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Microbiology GroupCenter for Biological Research of the Northwest (CIB)La PazMexico
  2. 2.Cuban Research Institute on Sugarcane By-ProductsHavanaCuba

Personalised recommendations