Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 236–244

Fungal diversity in agricultural soil under different farming management systems, with special reference to biocontrol strains of Trichoderma spp.

  • Alexandra Hagn
  • Karin Pritsch
  • Michael Schloter
  • Jean Charles Munch
Original Paper


Fungal communities and their dynamics were investigated in relation to season, soil type and farming management practice. The research was done using soils from high- (H) and low-yield areas (L) of a field site cultivated with winter wheat under two different farming management systems (precision farming, P; conventional farming, C) over the vegetation period. Fungal diversity was analysed by cultivation-independent methods [direct extraction of DNA from soil followed by PCR amplification of a subunit of the 18S rDNA and fingerprinting (DGGE)] as well as cultivation-dependent techniques (isolation of pure cultures). The comparisons of the PCR amplicons by DGGE patterns showed no differences between the different sampling sites and no influence of the farming management systems. Only small differences were observed over the vegetation period. For cultivation purposes active hyphae were isolated using a soil-washing technique. The resulting isolates were subcultured and grouped by their morphology and genotype. In contrast to the cultivation independent approaches, clear site-specific and seasonal effects on the fungal community structure could be observed. However, minor effects of the different farming management techniques applied were visible for active populations. These results clearly indicate that the potential fungal community (including spores), investigated by the cultivation-independent approach, is almost entirely uninfluenced by the investigated factors, whereas active populations show a clear response to environmental changes. The most abundant group consisting of Trichoderma species was investigated in more detail using strain-specific genotype based fingerprinting techniques as well as a screening for potential biocontrol activity against the wheat pathogen Fusarium graminearum. The genotypic distribution as well as the potential biocontrol activity revealed clear site-specific patterns.


Fungal communities Management system Isolates 18S rDNA DGGE 


  1. Arisan-Atac I, Heidenreich E, Kubicek CP (1995) Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting identifies subgroups of Trichoderma viride and other Trichoderma sp. capable of chestnut blight biocontrol. FEMS Microbiol Lett 126:249–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Assavanig A, Amornkitticharoen B, Ekpaisal N, Meevootisom V, Flegel TW (1992) Isolation, characterization and function of laccase from Trichoderma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 38:198–202Google Scholar
  3. Baird RE (1997) Diversity and longevity of the soybean debris mycobiota in a no-tillage system. Plant Dis 81:530–534Google Scholar
  4. Bateman GL, Murray G (2001) Seasonal variations in populations of Fusarium species in wheat-field soil. Appl Soil Ecol 18:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulluck LR III, Brosius M, Evanylo GK, Ristaino JB (2002) Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl Soil Ecol 19:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen M (1989) A view of fungal ecology. Mycologia 81:1-19Google Scholar
  7. Crowe JD, Olsson S (2001) Induction of laccase activity in Rhizoctonia solani by antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens strains and a range of chemical treatments. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2088–2094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd SL, Crowhurst RN, Rodrigo AG, Samuels GJ, Hill RA, Stewart A (2000) Examination of Trichoderma phylogenesis derived from ribosomal DNA sequence data. Mycol Res 104:23–24Google Scholar
  9. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (eds)(1993) Trichoderma harizianum. In: Compendium of soil fungi. IHW, Eching, pp 797–799Google Scholar
  10. Donnison LM, Griffith GS, Hedger J, Hobbs PJ, Bardgett RD (2000) Management influences on soil microbial communities and their function in botanically diverse haymeadows of Northern England and Wales. Soil Biol Biochem 32:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elsas JD van, Duarte GF, Keijzer-Wolters A, Smit E (2000) Analysis of the dynamics of fungal communities in soil via fungal-specific PCR of soil DNA followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J Microbiol Methods 43:133–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Flessa H, Ruser R, Schilling R, Loftfield N, Munch JC, Kaiser EA, Beese F (2002) N2O and CH4 fluxes in potato fields: automated measurement, management effects and temporal variation. Geoderma 105:307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankland JC, Dighton J, Boddy L (1990) Methods for studying fungi in soil and forest litter. Methods Microbiol 22:343–404Google Scholar
  14. Grondona I, Hermosa R, Tejada M, Gomis MD, Mateos PF, Bridge PD, Monte E, Garcia-Acha I (1997) Physiological and biochemical characterization of Trichoderma harzianum, a biological control agent against soilborne fungal plant pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3189–3198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagn A, Pritsch K, Ludwig W, Schloter M (2003a) Theoretical and practical approaches to evaluate specific primer sets for soil fungal community analysis. Acta Biotech 23(4) (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Hagn A, Pritsch K, Schloter M (2003b) Assessment of fungal diversity and community structure in agricultural used soils. In: Pandalai SG (ed) Recent research developments in microbiology 6, part II. Research Signpost, Kerala, (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Hawksworth DL, Rossmann AY (1997) Where are all the undescribed fungi. Phytopathology 87:888–891Google Scholar
  18. Henikoff S (1984) Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene 28:351–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermosa MR, Grondona I, Iturriaga EA, Diaz-Minguez JM, Castro C, Monte E, Garcia-Acha I (2000) Molecular characterization and identification of biocontrol isolates of Trichoderma spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1890–1898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heukeshoven J, Dernick R (1986) Neue Erkenntnisse zum Mechanismus der Silberfärbung. In: Radola BJ (ed) Elektrophorese Forum. TU München, Munich, pp 22–27Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson LJ (1990) Studies on the systematics of ectomycorrhizal fungi in axenic culture. II. The enzymatic degradation of selected carbon and nitrogen compounds. Can J Bot 68:1522–1530Google Scholar
  22. Kinderman J, El-Ayonti Y, Samuels GJ, Kubicek CP (1998) Phylogeny of the genus Trichoderma based on sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region 1 of the rDNA cluster. Fungal Genet Biol 24:298–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klingen I, Eilenberg J, Meadow R (2002) Effects of farming system, field margins and bait insect on the occurrence of insect pathogenic fungi in soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kullnig-Gradinger CM, Szakacs G, Kubicek CP (2002) Phylogeny and evolution of the genus Trichoderma: a multigene approach. Mycol Res 106:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwasna H, Sierota Z, Bateman GL (2000) Fungal communities in fallow soil before and after amending with pine sawdust. Appl Soil Ecol 14:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lieckfeldt E, Samuels GJ, Nirenberg H, Petrini O (1999) A morphological and molecular perspective of Trichoderma viride: is it one or two species? Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2418–2428Google Scholar
  27. Lieckfeldt E, Cavignac Y, Fekete C, Barner T (2000) Endochitinase gene-based phylogenetic analysis of Trichoderma. Microbiol Res 155:7-15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell JI, Roberts PJ, Moss ST (1995) Sequence or structure? A short review on the application of nucleic acid sequence information to fungal taxonomy. The Mycologist 9:67–75Google Scholar
  29. Mohammadi M, Kazemi H (2002) Changes in peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities in susceptible and resistant wheat heads inoculated with Fusarium graminearum and induced resistance. Plant Sci 162:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moser M (1959) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Wuchsstoffbeziehungen im Bereich ectotropher Mycorrhizen I. Arch Mikrobiol 34:51–269Google Scholar
  31. Polyanskaya LM, Orazova MK, Mirchink TG, Zvyagintsev DG (1994) Dynamics of the microbial abundance and the composition of the microbial complex in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of pea. Microbiology 63:175–182Google Scholar
  32. Rayner ADM (1992) Introduction. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT (eds) The fungal community. Dekker, New York, pp xvii–xxivGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez-Diaz M, Honrubia M (1994) Water relations and alleviation of drought stress in mycorrhizal plants. In: Gianinazzi S, Schepp H (eds) Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizas on sustainable agriculture and natural ecosystems. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 167–178Google Scholar
  34. Schirmbock M, Lorito M, Wang YL, Hayes CK, Arisan-Atac I, Scala F, Harman GE, Kubicek CP (1994) Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonistic action of Trichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4364–4370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schloter M, Bach HJ, Metz S, Sehy U, Munch JC (2003) Influence of precision farming on the microbial community structure and selected functions in nitrogen turnover. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2080:1–10Google Scholar
  36. Schröder P, Huber B, Olazábal U, Kämmerer A, Munch JC (2002) Land use and sustainability: FAM research network on agroecosystems. Geoderma 105:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Score AJ, Palfreyman JW, White NA (1997) Extracellular phenoloxidase and peroxidase enzyme production during interspecific fungal interactions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 39:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sehy U, Ruser R, Munch JC (2003) Nitrous oxide fluxes from maize fields: relationship to yield, site-specific fertilization, and soil conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
  40. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688Google Scholar
  41. Smida J, Leibhard S, Nickel AM, Eckhardt-Schupp F, Hieber L (1996) Application of repetitive sequence-based PCR (InterLINE PCR) for the analysis of genomic rearrangements and for the genome characterization on different taxonomic levels. Genet Anal Biomol E 13:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smit E, Leeflang P, Glandorf B, van Elsas JD, Wernars K (1999) Analysis of fungal diversity in the wheat rhizosphere by sequencing of cloned PCR-amplified genes encoding 18S rRNA and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2514–2621Google Scholar
  43. Smith SE, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1998) Physiological interactions between symbionts in vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 39:221–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor JP, Wilson B, Mills MS, Burns RG (2002) Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biol Biochem 34:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorn G (1997) The fungi in soil. In: van Elsas JD, Wellington EMH, Trevors JT (eds) Modern soil microbiology. Dekker, New York, pp 63–127Google Scholar
  46. Viaud M, Pasquieur A, Brygoo Y (2000) Diversity of soil fungi studied by PCR-RFLP of ITS. Mycol Res 104:1027–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Viterbo A, Ramot O, Chernin L, Chet I (2002) Significance of lytic enzymes from Trichoderma spp. in the biocontrol of fungal plant pathogens. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 81:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warcup JH (1951) The ecology of soil fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 34:376–399Google Scholar
  49. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplifications and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfland DH, Sninsky J, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Hagn
    • 1
  • Karin Pritsch
    • 1
  • Michael Schloter
    • 1
  • Jean Charles Munch
    • 1
  1. 1.GSF-National Research Center for Environment and HealthInstitute of Soil EcologyOberschleissheimGermany

Personalised recommendations