The Visual Computer

, Volume 26, Issue 6–8, pp 619–628 | Cite as

Usability evaluation of virtual reality interaction techniques for positioning and manoeuvring in reduced, manipulation-oriented environments

  • Diego Martinez
  • Suzanne Kieffer
  • Jonatan Martinez
  • Jose P. Molina
  • Benoit Macq
  • Pascual Gonzalez
Original Article

Abstract

This paper introduces some novel interaction techniques based on the concepts of composite positioning and composite manoeuvring (described in the paper). In contrast with other previous proposals, these techniques have been designed and evaluated in the context of a user centred process. The results of this evaluation and some relevant findings for the field of human computer interaction are also described.

Keywords

Virtual reality Interaction techniques Usability evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Herndon, K.P., van Dam, A., Gleicher, M.: The challenges of 3D interaction: a CHI ’94 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 26(4), 36–46 (1994) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J. Jr., Poupyrev, I.: An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence 10(1), 96–108 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pittarello, F., Celentano, A.: Interaction locus: a multimodal approach for the structuring of virtual spaces. In: Proc. of HCITaly Symposium (2001) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrilleaux, J.: 3D User Interfaces with Java3D. Manning Publications (2001) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sutcliffe, A.: Multimedia and Virtual Reality: Designing Multisensory User Interfaces. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2003) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyd, D., Sastry, L.: Development of the INQUISITIVE interaction toolkit—concept and realisation. In: User Centered Design and Implementation of Virtual Environments (UCDIVE) Workshop (1999) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poupyrev, I., Weghorst, S., Billinghurst, M., Ichikawa, T.: Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. Comput. Graph. Forum 17(3), 41–52 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J. Jr., Poupyrev, E.I.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowman, D.A., Gabbard, J.L., Hix, D.: A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: classification and comparison of methods. Presence 11(4), 435–455 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiyokawa, K., Takemura, H., Katayama, Y., Iwasa, H., Yokoya, N.: VLEGO: a simple two-handed modeling environment based on toy blocks. In: Proc. ACM Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 27–34 (1996) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heldal, I., Steed, A., Schroeder, R.: Evaluating Collaboration in Distributed Virtual Environments for a Puzzle-solving Task. HCI International (2005) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia, A.S., et al.: Collaborative virtual environments: you can’t do it alone, can you? In: HCII ’07. Virtual Reality, vol. 4563, pp. 224–233. Springer, Berlin (2007) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts, D., Wolff, R., Otto, O., Steed, A.: Constructing a gazebo: supporting teamwork in a tightly coupled, distributed task in virtual reality. Presence 16(6), 644–657 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinez, D., Garcia, A.S., Martinez, J., Molina, J.P., Gonzalez, P.: A model of interaction for CVEs based in the model of human communication. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 14(19), 3071–3084 (2008) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lawson, J.-Y., Al-Akkad, A., Vanderdonckt, J., Macq, B.: An open source workbench for prototyping multimodal interactions based on off-the-shelf heterogeneous components. In: Proc. of the First ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, pp. 245–254. ACM, New York (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gabbard, J.L., Hix, D., Swan, J.E.: User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 19(6), 51–59 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moss, J., Scisco, J., Muth, E.: Simulator sickness during HMD of real world video captured scenes. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, vol. 52, No. 19, pp. 1631–1634 (2008) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hakkinen, J., Vuori, T., Paakka, M.: Postural stability and sickness symptoms after HMD use. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, pp. 147–152 (2002) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansson, R.S., Westling, G., Backstrom, A., Flanagan, J.R.: Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J. Neurosci. 21(17), 6917–6932 (2001) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poupyrev, I., Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S., Ichikawa, T.: The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. In: Proc. of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, pp. 79–80 (1996) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO 9241, Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display Terminals (VDTs) (1998) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Martinez
    • 1
  • Suzanne Kieffer
    • 2
  • Jonatan Martinez
    • 1
  • Jose P. Molina
    • 1
  • Benoit Macq
    • 2
  • Pascual Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigacion Informatica de Albacete (I3A)Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)La ManchaSpain
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Teldetection et Telecommunications (TELE)Universite Catholique du Louvain (UCL)Louvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations