The Visual Computer

, 25:1085

Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games

  • J. W. Burke
  • M. D. J. McNeill
  • D. K. Charles
  • P. J. Morrow
  • J. H. Crosbie
  • S. M. McDonough
Original Article

Abstract

Effective stroke rehabilitation must be early, intensive and repetitive, which can lead to problems with patient motivation and engagement. The design of video games, often associated with good user engagement, may offer insights into how more effective systems for stroke rehabilitation can be developed. In this paper we identify game design principles for upper limb stroke rehabilitation and present several games developed using these principles. The games use low-cost video-capture technology which may make them suitable for deployment at home. Results from evaluating the games with both healthy subjects and people with stroke in their home are encouraging.

Keywords

Engagement Serious games Rehabilitation Stroke Video capture 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, R.: The Aftermath of Stroke: The Experience of Patients and Their Families. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borg, G.A.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14, 377–381 (1982) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burdea, G.: Key note address: Virtual rehabilitation—benefits and challenges. In: 1st Intl. Workshop on Virtual Reality Rehabilitation (Mental Health, Neurological, Physical, Vocational), pp. 1–11 (2002) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, J.W., McNeill, M.D.J., Charles, D.K., Morrow, P.J., McDonough, S.M., Crosbie, J.H.: serious games for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS Games ’09), pp. 103–110 (2009) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crosbie, J.H., McDonough, S.M., Lennon, S., Pokluda, L., McNeill, M.D.J.:Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: The user’s perspective. In: 5th Intl. Conf. for Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Tech., pp. 215–224 (2004) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J.A.: Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In: Proc. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI)’04, pp. 1509–1512 (2004) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Jack, D., Boian, R., Merians, A., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G., Adamovich, S.: Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 9, 308–318 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koster, R.: A Theory of Fun for Game Design. Paraglyph, Arizona (2005) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R.C., Twisk, J.W., Lankhorst, G.J., Koetsier, J.C.: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 354, 191–196 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma, M., McNeill, M., Charles, D., McDonough, S., Crosbie, J., Oliver, L., McGoldrick, C.: Adaptive virtual reality games for rehabilitation of motor disorders. Lect. Not. Comput. Sci. 4555, 681–690 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrow, K., Docan, C., Burdea, G., Merians, A.: Low-cost virtual rehabilitation of the hand for patients post-stroke. In: Intl. Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation ’06, pp. 6–10 (2006) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peek, B.: Managed library for Nintendo’s Wiimote. http://www.brianpeek.com (2008)
  14. 14.
    Rand, D., Kizony, R., Weiss, P.L.: Virtual reality rehabilitation for all: Vivid GX versus Sony PlayStation II EyeToy. In: Proc. 5th Intl. Conf. on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Tech ’04, pp. 87–94 (2004) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rizzo, A., Kim, G.J.: A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence 14, 119–146 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Lee, J.H., Wagenaar, R.C., Lankhorst, G.J., Vogelaar, T.W., Devillé, W.L., Bouter, L.M.: Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 30(11), 2369–2375 (1999) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wade, D.T., Wood, V.A., Hewer, R.L.: Recovery after stroke—the first three months. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 48, 7–13 (1985) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss, P., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U., Katz, N.: Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Textbook of Neural Repair and Neurorehabilitation, vol. 2, pp. 182–197 (2005) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7, 225–240 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yavuzer, G., Senel, A., Atay, M.B., Stam, H.J.: Playstation Eyetoy games improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 44(3), 237–244 (2008) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Burke
    • 1
  • M. D. J. McNeill
    • 1
  • D. K. Charles
    • 1
  • P. J. Morrow
    • 1
  • J. H. Crosbie
    • 2
  • S. M. McDonough
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computing and Information EngineeringUniversity of UlsterColeraineNorthern Ireland
  2. 2.School of Health SciencesUniversity of UlsterJordanstownNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations