Advertisement

Influence of submarine topography and associated sedimentary processes on the distribution of live and dead rhodoliths near Udo Island, Korea

  • Joo Bong Jeong
  • Seok Yun Kim
  • Young Kyo Seo
  • Jin-Kyoung Kim
  • Jungkyun Shin
  • Kyung Sik WooEmail author
Original
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The distribution of rhodoliths growing near the Udo islands in the Republic of Korea was identified and the controlling factors influencing their growth and distribution were investigated. Their mineralogical and textural features of growth patterns and the physical oceanographic properties that influence the rhodolith distribution were also examined. The study area is relatively shallow with a water depth of less than 20 m and thus is influenced by seasonal typhoons and winter storms as well as wind-driven waves and strong tidal currents. The study site was divided into four areas based on the distribution of the rhodoliths and the associated physical and biological factors. The bedrock-exposed area partially covered with live rhodoliths (area I) at depths of up to 10 m provides an environment characterized by high wave energy and irregular seabed topography, which precludes continuous rhodolith growth and accumulation. Living rhodoliths were rarely observed and the sediments continuously migrate to adjacent beaches and shallow waters. The depth range of 10–15 m can be divided into the northern (the active growth area of live rhodoliths, area II) and southern (the sand dune area with dead rhodoliths, area III) areas. The southern part, where underwater sand dunes appear, is predominantly distributed with sandy sediments and ripple marks, which makes it an adverse environment for continuous growth of rhodoliths. In contrast, the northern part has a bowl-shaped seabed with gentle slopes, providing a stable condition for the constant and active growth of rhodoliths. In areas deeper than 15 m (the seagrass-covered area with live rhodoliths, area IV), an irregular seabed topography is present and the wave energy is reduced. Consequently, various sizes of rhodoliths with bumpy surfaces are distributed throughout this area. Therefore, it is suggested that the distribution of the rhodoliths is affected by the bottom topography and the associated physical energy, in conjunction with different types of surface sediments. The results of this study will increase the understanding of rhodoliths elsewhere in the world.

Notes

Funding information

This research was part of the project titled “A Study on the Integrated Management of Marine Space (2020)” funded by the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) and also supported by the project “Establishment of the integrated maintenance of Udo Rhodolith Beach in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province” funded by the Cultural Heritage Administration.

References

  1. Adey WH (1979) Crustose coralline algae as microenvironmental indicators in the tertiary. In: Gray J, Boucot AJ (eds) Historical biogeography, plate tectonics and the changing environment. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 459–464Google Scholar
  2. Adey WH (1986) c. In: van de Plassche (ed) Sea-level research: a manual for the collection and evaluation of data. Free University, Amsterdam, pp 229–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adey WH, Macintyre IG (1973) Crustose coralline algae: a re-evaluation in the geological sciences. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguirre J, Braga JC, Martín JM, Betzler C (2012) Palaeoenvironmental and stratigraphic significance of Pliocene rhodolith beds and coralline algal bioconstructions from the Carboneras Basin (SE Spain). Geodiversitas 34:115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amado-Filho GM, Maneveldt GW, Pereira-Filho GH, Manso RCC, Bahia RG, Barros-Barreto MB, Guimarães SMPB (2010) Seaweed diversity associated with a Brazilian tropical rhodolith bed. Cienc Mar 36:371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amado-Filho GM, Moura RL, Bastos AC, Salgado LT, Sumida PY, Guth AZ, Francini-Filho RB, Pereira-Filho GH, Abrantes DP, Brasileiro PS, Bahia RG, Leal RN, Kaufman L, Kleypas JA, Farina M, Thompson FL (2012) Rhodolith beds are major CaCO3 bio-factories in the tropical south west Atlantic. PLoS One 7:e35171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballantine DL, Bowden-Kerby A, Aponte NE (2000) Cruoriella rhodoliths from shallow-water back reef environments in La Parguera, Puerto Rico (Caribbean Sea). Coral Reefs 19:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ballesteros E (2006) Mediterranean coralligenous assemblages: a synthesis of present knowledge. Oceanogr Mar Biol 44:123–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basso D (1998) Deep rhodolith distribution in the Pontian Islands, Italy: a model for the palaeo-ecology of a temperate sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 137:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BIOMAERL Team (1999) Final report, BIOMAERL project (Coordinator: Moore PG, University Marine Biological Station Millport, Scotland), EC Contract No. MAS3-CT95–0020, 1: 1–541, 2:542–973Google Scholar
  11. BIOMAERL Team (2003) Conservation and management of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean maerl beds. Aquat Conserv 13:S65–S76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanc JJ (1968) Sedimentary geology of the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 6:377–454Google Scholar
  13. Bosellini A, Ginsburg RN (1971) Form and internal structure of recent algal nodules (rhodolites) from Bermuda. J Geol 79:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bosence DWJ (1983a) In: Peryt TM (ed) The occurrence and ecology of recent rhodoliths—a review. Coated Grains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 225–242Google Scholar
  15. Bosence DWJ (1983b) Descriptions and classification of rhodoliths (rhodoids, rhodolites). In: Peryt TM (ed) Coated grains. Springer, Berlin, pp 217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byun CI, Jeong YJ, Noh HK (1983) Oceanographic characteristics of the inshore of Jeju, with focus on Seongsanpo. Ann Oceanograph Rep, Nat Univ Jeju 7:59–64Google Scholar
  17. Diaz RJ, Solan M, Valente RM (2004) A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. J Environ Manag 73:165–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folk RL (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. J Geol 62:344-359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill Publishing Co., Austin, 182 pGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster MS (2001) Rhodoliths: between rocks and soft places. Phycol 37:659–667.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.00195.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster MS, Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Steller DL, Woelkerling WJ (1997) Living rhodolith beds in the Gulf of California and their implications. Pliocene carbonates and related facies flanking the Gulf of California, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Boulder, Colorado, Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 318. p 127Google Scholar
  22. Foster MS, Amado-Filho GM, Kamenos NA, Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Steller DL (2013) Rhodoliths and rhodolith beds. In: Lange M (ed) Smithsonian contributions to the marine sciences no. 39. Smithsonian Institution, Wasington, pp 143–155Google Scholar
  23. Freeman SM, Rogers SI (2003) A new analytical approach to the characterisation of macro-epibenthic habitats: linking species to the environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:749–764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00297-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galehouse JS (1971) Sedimentation analysis. Procedures in sedimentary petrology. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 69–94Google Scholar
  25. Hall-Spencer J, Rogers A, Davies J, Foggo A (2007) Deep-sea coral distribution on eamounts, oceanic islands, and continental slopes in the Northeast Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci 81(Supplement 1):135–146Google Scholar
  26. Heo NG, Woo KS, Hong W (2012) Sea-water paleotemperature and growth rate estimation using a rhodolith near Udo, Jeju Island: a preliminary study for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. J Geol Soc Korea 48(4):285–297 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  27. Heyman WD (2011) Elements for building a participatory, ecosystem-based marine reserve network. Prof Geogr 63(4):475–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hottinger L (1983) Neritic macroid genesis, an ecological approach. In: Peryt TM (ed) Coated grains. Springer, Berlin, pp 38–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingram R (1971) Sieve analysis. Procedures in sedimentary petrology. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 49–67Google Scholar
  30. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (2015) Report on the Monitoring survey of Udo/Jeju rhodoliths beach, pp 428 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  31. Ji OM, Woo KS (1995) Composition of beach sediments in Cheju Island. J Korean Soc Oceanol 30:481–492 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  32. Johnson VR, Russell BD, Fabricius KE, Brownlee C, Hall-Spencer JM (2012) Temperate and tropical brown macroalgae thrive, despite decalcification, along natural CO2 gradients. Glob Chang Biol 18:2792–2803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim JK, Woo KS, Kang SS (2003) Characteristics and formation conditions of the rhodoliths in Wu Island beach, Jeju-do, Korea: preliminary report. J Korean Soc Oceanogr 8(4):401–410 (Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  34. Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Administration (1990) Current diagram (Udo and environs). Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries No. 226 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  35. Korea Meteorological Adiministration (2015) Typoon technical note 2015-3, 175 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Kwak HS (1993) A study on the atlas of marine resources in the adjacent seas to Korea—South Sea. Korea Ocean Research Development Institute, p. 157 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  37. Littler MM, Littler DS, Hanisak MD (1991) Deep-water rhodolith distribution, productivity, and growth history at sites of formation and subsequent degradation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 150:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lund M, Davies PJ, Braga JC (2000) Coralline algal nodules off Fraser Island, eastern Australia. Facies 42:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marrack E (1999) The relationship between water motion and living rhodolith beds in the south-western Gulf of California, México. Palaios 14:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin S, Gattuso JP (2009) Response of Mediterranean coralline algae to ocean acidification and elevated temperature. Glob Chang Biol 15(8):2089–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matsuda S, Iryu Y (2011) Rhodoliths from deep fore-reef to shelf areas around Okinawa-jima, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Mar Geol 282:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McManus J (1988) Grain size determination and interpretation. In: Tucker ME (ed) Techniques in sedimentology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 63–85Google Scholar
  43. McMaster RL, Conover JT (1966) Recent algal stromatolites from the Canary Islands. J Geol 74:647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Molinier R (1956) Les fonds à laminaires du Grand Banc de Centuri (Cap Corse). CR Acad Sci Paris 342:939–941Google Scholar
  45. Noh HK, Jeong GH (1976) Temperature and salinity variations in the inshore of Jeju (I). Ann. Dissert Anthol Nat Univ Jeju 8:115–122 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  46. Noh HK, Jeong GH (1977) Temperature and salinity variations in the inshore of Jeju (II). Annual Dissertation Anthology of the National University of Jeju 9:131–136 (in Korean)Google Scholar
  47. Pérès JM, Picard J (1964) Nouveau Manuel de Bionomie benthique de la mer Méditerranée. Rec Trav Stat Mar Endoume 31(47):1-137Google Scholar
  48. Pérès JM, Picard J (1958) Recherches sur les peuplements benthiques de la Méditerranée nord- orientale. Ann Inst Océanogr Monaco 34:213–291Google Scholar
  49. Prager EJ, Ginsburg RN (1989) Carbonate nodule growth on Florida’s outer shelf and its implications for fossil interpretations. Palaios 4:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reid RP, MacIntyre IG (1988) Foraminiferal—algal nodules from the Eastern Caribbean: growth history and implications on the value of nodules as paleoenvironmental indicators. Palaios 3:424–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Steller DL, Hinojosa-Arango G, Foster MS (2010) Reefs that rock and roll: biology and conservation of rhodolith beds in the gulf of California. In: Brusca RC (ed) The gulf of California biodiversity and conservation. The University of Arizona Press and The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, pp 49–71Google Scholar
  52. Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Nelson W & Aguirre J (Eds.) (2017) Rhodolith/maërl beds: a global perspective. Springer International Publishing, Charm, 368 pp.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29315-8 Google Scholar
  53. Schäfer P, Fortunato H, Bader B, Liebetrau V, Bauch T, Reijmer JJG (2011) Growth rates and carbonate production by coralline red algae in upwelling and non-upwelling settings along the Pacific coast of Panama. Palaios 26:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scoffin TP, Stoddart DR, Tudhope AW, Woodroffe C (1985) Rhodoliths and coralliths of Muri Lagoon, Rarotonga, Cook Islands. Coral Reefs 4:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sewell AA, Johnson ME, Backus DH, Ledesma-Vázquez J (2007) Rhodolith detritus impounded by a coastal dune on Isla Coronados. Gulf Calif Cienc Mar 33(4):483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sohn YK, Chough SK (1993) The Udo tuff con, Cheju Island, South Korea: transformation of pyroclastic fall into debris fall and grain flow on a steep volcanic cone slope. Sedimentology 40:769–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steller DL, Cáceres C (2009) Coralline algal rhodoliths enhance larval settlement and early growth of the Pacific calico scallop Argopecten ventricosus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 396:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steller DL, Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Foster MS, Roberts CA (2003) Rhodolith bed diversity in the Gulf of California: the importance of rhodolith structure and consequences of disturbance. Aquat Conserv 13:S5–S20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steller DL, Riosmena-Rodríquez R, Foster MS (2009) Living rhodolith bed ecosystems in the Gulf of California. In: Johnson ME, Ledesma-Vázquez J (eds) Atlas of coastal ecosystems in the western Gulf of California: tracking limestone deposits on the margin of a young sea. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 72–82Google Scholar
  60. Steneck RS (1986) The ecology of coralline algal crusts: convergent patterns and adaptive strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woo KS (2001) Annual report on geoheritage assessment. Cultural heritage administration, pp 226–229Google Scholar
  63. Woo KS (2002) Report on geoheritage assessment. Cultural heritage administration, pp 173–216Google Scholar
  64. Yoon SH (2017) Report on the monitoring survey of Udo/Jeju rhodoliths reach. p 263 (in Korean)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joo Bong Jeong
    • 1
  • Seok Yun Kim
    • 2
  • Young Kyo Seo
    • 3
  • Jin-Kyoung Kim
    • 4
  • Jungkyun Shin
    • 5
  • Kyung Sik Woo
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Korea Seas Geosystem Research UnitKorea Institute of Ocean Science and TechnologyBusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of OceanographyPukyong National UniversityBusanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Gematek CorporationBusanSouth Korea
  4. 4.First Institute of OceanographyQingdaoChina
  5. 5.Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ResourcesPohangSouth Korea
  6. 6.Department of GeologyKangwon National UniversityChuncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations