Advertisement

Geo-Marine Letters

, Volume 25, Issue 2–3, pp 89–97 | Cite as

Morphogenetic classification of the Arctic coastal zone

  • S. L. NikiforovEmail author
  • Yu A. Pavlidis
  • V. Rachold
  • M. N. Grigoryev
  • F. M. Rivkin
  • N. V. Ivanova
  • M. M. Koreisha
Original

Abstract

Arctic coastal evolution is the result of interactions between exogenic and endogenic processes. In the arctic region, this evolution differs from that in other areas of the world’s oceans as a result of interactions between modern wave and ice factors, and the influences of glaciations and large-scale sea level changes in the past. Geologic structure, origin and development determine contemporary relief morphology. Morphology appears to be the most significant relief characteristic, but it is controlled by a set of interactive processes active over long periods. Our approach, in which a multitude of interacting factors are simultaneously analyzed and determined, could be called “morphogenetic”. We consider marine coasts and offshore zones (shelf) as a unit, and providing a general explanation for their evolution. The classification presented here is based upon the general approach given in the Science and Implementation Plan of Arctic Coastal Dynamics (ACD), a project of the International Arctic Science Committee and the International Permafrost Association. Our classification extends beyond the morphological ACD classification to include a morphogenetic classification.

Keywords

Offshore Zone Coastal Shallow Late Quaternary Period Detailed Morphological Characteristic Relief Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by INTAS (grant No. 2001–2332).

References

  1. Carlson PR, Karl HA (1984) Geology of two large submarine canyons in the Bering Sea. Mar Geol 174:159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coastal Zone Resources Assessment Guidelines (1996) LOICZ reports and studies No. 4, pp 1–101Google Scholar
  3. Creager JS, McManus DA (1967) Bottom sediments data from the continental shelf of the Chuckchi and Bering seas. Washington University Department of Oceanography Tech Rep 135, pp 343–351Google Scholar
  4. Grigoriev MN, Rachold V, Bolshiyanov DYu, Hubberten H-W, Pfeifer E-M, Schirrmeister L, Wagner D (2003) Russian-German Cooperation System Laptev Sea 2000: the expedition LENA 2002. Polar Mar Res 466:350Google Scholar
  5. IASC Arctic Coastal Dynamics (ACD) (2001) Science and Implementation Plan, International Arctic Science Committee, Oslo, April 2001Google Scholar
  6. Ionin AS, Kaplin PA, Medvedev V (1961) Classification of World Ocean shorelines. New studies of seas and inner lakes. Moscow, RAS: 94–108 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Ionin A, Pavlidis Yu, Yurkevich M (1990) Relief of arctic eastern shelf of Russia and its classification. In: Aksenov A (ed) Geology and geomorphology of shelf and continental slope (In Russian). JAD, Moscow Nauka, pp 24–50Google Scholar
  8. Kaplin P, Leont’ev O, Luk’anova S, Nikiforov L (1991) Marine shorelines (in Russian). Misl, Moscow, p 480 Google Scholar
  9. Leont’ev O (1956) Classification and shoreline mapping (in Russian). Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geomorphology, p 182 Google Scholar
  10. Leont’ev O, Nikiforov L, Saf’anov G (1975) Geomorphology of marine coasts (in Russian). Lomonosov Moscow State University, p 336 Google Scholar
  11. McGill IT (1959) Coastal classification maps, a review. In: 2nd coastal geography conference. Coastal Studies Institute, LouisianaGoogle Scholar
  12. Nikiforov S (1996) The main features of modern sedimentation in the southern part of the East Siberian Sea. Polar Res 212: 89–95Google Scholar
  13. Rachold V (1999) Expeditions in Siberia in 1998. Polar Mar Res 315:268Google Scholar
  14. Rachold V (2000) Expeditions in Siberia in 1999. Polar Mar Res 354:303Google Scholar
  15. Rachold V, Grigoriev MN (2001) Russian-German Cooperation System Laptev Sea 2000: The Expedition LENA 2000. Polar Mar Res 388:135Google Scholar
  16. Rachold V, Brown J, Solomon S (2003) Arctic coastal dynamics (ACD)—a new LOICZ Regional Project. LOICZ Newslett 29, December 2003, 1–5Google Scholar
  17. Richthofen F (1901) Führer für Forschungsreisende. Hannover, Neuntes Kapitel. Beobachtungen an MeeresküstenGoogle Scholar
  18. Rivkin FM, Koreisha MM, Ivanova NV (2003) The engineering-geocryological zoning of the Russian Arctic coast for the estimation of hazard caused by the industrial impact. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Permafrost, 21–25 July 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, AA Balkema Publishers, vol 2. pp 959–964Google Scholar
  19. Schlüter O (1924) Ein Beitrag zur Klassifikation der Küstentypen. “Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin 8–10Google Scholar
  20. Valentin H (1952) Die Küsten der Erde. Ergänzungsheft 246 zu Petermanns MitteilungenGoogle Scholar
  21. Zenkovich VP (1954) Dynamical classification of marine coasts (In Russian). Trudi IORAS 10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Nikiforov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yu A. Pavlidis
    • 1
  • V. Rachold
    • 2
  • M. N. Grigoryev
    • 3
  • F. M. Rivkin
    • 4
  • N. V. Ivanova
    • 4
  • M. M. Koreisha
    • 4
  1. 1.P.P.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchResearch Unit PotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Permafrost InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesYakutsk
  4. 4.Institute of Engineering Survey for ConstructionIndustrial and ResearchMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations