Advertisement

Nonlinear dynamic analysis of piezoelectric-bonded FG-CNTR composite structures using an improved FSDT theory

  • H. MallekEmail author
  • H. Jrad
  • M. Wali
  • F. Dammak
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, a geometrically nonlinear finite shell element is first presented to predict nonlinear dynamic behavior of piezolaminated functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite (FG-CNTRC) shell, to enrich the existing research results on FG-CNTRC structures. The governing equations are developed via an improved first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT), in which a parabolic distribution of the transverse shear strains across the shell thickness is assumed and a zero condition of the transverse shear stresses on the top and bottom surfaces is imposed. Using a micro-mechanical model on the foundation of the developed rule of mixture, the effective material properties of the FG-CNTRC structures, which are strengthened by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), are scrutinized. The effectiveness of the present method is demonstrated by validating the obtained results against those of other studies from literature considering shell structures. Furthermore, some novel numerical results, including the nonlinear transient deflection of smart FG-CNTRC spherical and cylindrical shells, will be presented and can be considered for future structure design.

Keywords

Nonlinear dynamics Functionally graded carbon nanotubes Improved FSDT Smart shell Piezoelectric materials 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Gabbert U, Duvigneau F, Ringwelski S (2017) Noise control of vehicle drive systems. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 15:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gabbert U, Köppe H, Seeger F, Berger H (2002) Modeling of smart composite shell structures. J Theor Appl Mech 40:575–593Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jrad H, Mallek H, Wali M, Dammak F (2018) Finite element formulation for active functionally graded thin-walled structures. Comptes Rend Mécanique 346:1159–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Piezoelastic response of smart functionally graded structure with integrated piezoelectric layers using discrete double directors shell element. Compos Struct 210:354–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marinković D, Marinković Z, Petrović G (2012) On efficiency of a single-layer shell element for composite laminated structures. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 10:105–112Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marinković D, Zehn M (2015) Finite element formulation for active composite laminates. Am J Eng Appl Sci 8:328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mukherjee A, Chaudhuri AS (2002) Active control of dynamic instability of piezolaminated imperfect columns. Smart Mater Struct 11:874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yao LQ, Zhang JG, Lu L, Lai MO (2004) Nonlinear extension and bending of piezoelectric laminated plate under large applied field actuation. Smart Mater Struct 13:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moita JMS, Correia IF, Soares CMM, Soares CAM (2004) Active control of adaptive laminated structures with bonded piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Compos Struct 82:17–19MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saviz MR, Shakeri M, Yas MH (2007) Electroelastic fields in a layered piezoelectric cylindrical shell under dynamic load. Smart Mater Struct 16:1683–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saviz MR, Mohammadpourfard M (2010) Dynamic analysis of a laminated cylindrical shell with piezoelectric layers under dynamic loads. Finite Elem Anal Des 46:770–781MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frikha A, Zghal S, Dammak F (2018) Finite rotation three and four nodes shell elements for functionally graded carbon nanotubes-reinforced thin composite shells analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 329:289–311MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frikha A, Dammak F (2017) Geometrically non-linear static analysis of functionally graded material shells with a discrete double directors shell element. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 315:1–24MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hajlaoui A, Triki E, Frikha A et al (2017) Nonlinear dynamics analysis of FGM shell structures with a higher order shear strain enhanced solid-shell element. Latin Am J Solids Struct 14:72–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jrad H, Mars J, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of elastoplastic behavior of functionally graded shells. Eng Comput 35:833–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jrad H, Mars J, Wali M, Dammak F (2018) An extended finite element method for modeling elastoplastic FGM plate-shell type structures. Struct Eng Mech 68:299–312Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mars J, Koubaa S, Wali M, Dammak F (2017) Numerical analysis of geometrically non-linear behavior of functionally graded shells. Latin Am J Solids Struct 14:1952–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mellouli H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically nonlinear meshfree analysis of 3D-shell structures based on the double directors shell theory with finite rotations. Steel Compos Struct 31:397zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zghal S, Frikha A, Dammak F (2018) Non-linear bending analysis of nanocomposites reinforced by graphene-nanotubes with finite shell element and membrane enhancement. Eng Struct 158:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Katariya P, Hirwani C, Panda S (2019) Geometrically nonlinear deflection and stress analysis of skew sandwich shell panel using higher-order theory. Eng Comput 35:467–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Icardi U, Di Sciuva M (1996) Large-deflection and stress analysis of multilayered plates with induced-strain actuators. Smart Mater Struct 5:140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mukherjee A, Saha Chaudhuri A (2002) Piezolaminated beams with large deformations. Int J Solids Struct 39:4567–4582zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kulkarni SA, Bajoria KM (2006) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of smart thin and sandwich plates—Sudhakar A. Kulkarni, Kamal M. Bajoria, 2006. J Sandwich Struct Mater 8:321–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Panda S, Ray MC (2008) Nonlinear finite element analysis of functionally graded plates integrated with patches of piezoelectric fiber reinforced composite. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moita JMS, Soares CMM, Soares CAM (2002) Geometrically non-linear analysis of composite structures with integrated piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Compos Struct 57:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically nonlinear finite element simulation of smart laminated shells using a modified first-order shear deformation theory. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 30:517–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li H, Wang X, Chen J (2019) Nonlinear electro-mechanical coupling vibration of corrugated graphene/piezoelectric laminated structures. Int J Mech Sci 150:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sohn JW, Choi S-B, Kim HS (2011) Vibration control of smart hull structure with optimally placed piezoelectric composite actuators. Int J Mech Sci 53:647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang SQ, Zhao GZ, Rao MN (2019) A review on modeling techniques of piezoelectric integrated plates and shells. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 30(8):1133–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marinković D, Köppe H, Gabbert U (2009) Aspects of modeling piezoelectric active thin-walled structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20:1835–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rao MN, Tarun S, Schmidt R, Schröder K-U (2016) Finite element modeling and analysis of piezo-integrated composite structures under large applied electric fields. Smart Mater Struct 25:055044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rao MN, Schmidt R (2014) Static and dynamic finite rotation FE-analysis of thin-walled structures with piezoelectric sensor and actuator patches or layers. Smart Mater Struct 23:095006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang S-Q, Li Y-X, Schmidt R (2015) Active shape and vibration control for piezoelectric bonded composite structures using various geometric nonlinearities. Compos Struct 122:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang SQ, Schmidt R (2014) Static and dynamic FE analysis of piezoelectric integrated thin-walled composite structures with large rotations. Compos Struct 112:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang SQ, Schmidt R (2013) Large rotation FE transient analysis of piezolaminated thin-walled smart structures. Smart Mater Struct 22:105025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marinković D, Rama G (2017) Co-rotational shell element for numerical analysis of laminated piezoelectric composite structures. Compos B Eng 125:144–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rama G (2017) A 3-node piezoelectric shell element for linear and geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of smart structures. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 15:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rama G, Marinković D, Zehn M (2018) Efficient three-node finite shell element for linear and geometrically nonlinear analyses of piezoelectric laminated structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marinković D, Rama G, Zehn M (2019) Abaqus implementation of a corotational piezoelectric 3-node shell element with drilling degree of freedom. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 17:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hajlaoui A, Chebbi E, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of FGM shells using solid-shell element with parabolic shear strain distribution. Int J Mech Mater Des.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-019-09465-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mellouli H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Meshless implementation of arbitrary 3D-shell structures based on a modified first order shear deformation theory. Comput Math Appl 77:34–49MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mellouli H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Meshfree implementation of the double director shell model for FGM shell structures analysis. Eng Anal Bound Elem 99:111–121MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trabelsi S, Frikha A, Zghal S, Dammak F (2019) A modified FSDT-based four nodes finite shell element for thermal buckling analysis of functionally graded plates and cylindrical shells. Eng Struct 178:444–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Trabelsi S, Frikha A, Zghal S, Dammak F (2018) Thermal post-buckling analysis of functionally graded material structures using a modified FSDT. Int J Mech Sci 144:74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wali M, Hentati T, Jarraya A, Dammak F (2015) Free vibration analysis of FGM shell structures with a discrete double directors shell element. Compos Struct 125:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wali M, Hajlaoui A, Dammak F (2014) Discrete double directors shell element for the functionally graded material shell structures analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 278:388–403MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bouhamed A, Jrad H, Mars J et al (2019) Homogenization of elasto-plastic functionally graded material based on representative volume element: application to incremental forming process. Int J Mech Sci 160:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rajasekaran S (2018) Analysis of axially functionally graded nano-tapered Timoshenko beams by element-based Bernstein pseudospectral collocation (EBBPC). Eng Comput 34:543–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alizadeh M, Fattahi AM (2019) Non-classical plate model for FGMs. Eng Comput 35:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hajlaoui A, Chebbi E, Dammak F (2019) Buckling analysis of carbon nanotube reinforced FG shells using an efficient solid-shell element based on a modified FSDT. Thin-Walled Struct 144:106254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zghal S, Frikha A, Dammak F (2018) Free vibration analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced functionally graded composite shell structures. Appl Math Model 53:132–155MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zghal S, Frikha A, Dammak F (2017) Static analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced plate and shell structures. Compos Struct 176:1107–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang LW, Xiao LN, Zou GL, Liew KM (2016) Elastodynamic analysis of quadrilateral CNT-reinforced functionally graded composite plates using FSDT element-free method. Compos Struct 148:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang LW, Liu WH, Xiao LN (2017) Elastodynamic analysis of regular polygonal CNT-reinforced composite plates via FSDT element-free method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 76:80–89MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lei ZX, Zhang LW, Liew KM (2015) Elastodynamic analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced functionally graded plates. Int J Mech Sci 99:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mallek H, Jrad H, Algahtani A et al (2019) Geometrically non-linear analysis of FG-CNTRC shell structures with surface-bonded piezoelectric layers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:679–699MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhang LW, Song ZG, Liew KM (2016) Optimal shape control of CNT reinforced functionally graded composite plates using piezoelectric patches. Compos B Eng 85:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mohammadzadeh-Keleshteri M, Asadi H, Aghdam MM (2017) Geometrical nonlinear free vibration responses of FG-CNT reinforced composite annular sector plates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Compos Struct 171:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Alibeigloo A (2014) Three-dimensional thermoelasticity solution of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite plate embedded in piezoelectric sensor and actuator layers. Compos Struct 118:482–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Alibeigloo A, Zanoosi AP (2017) Thermo-electro-elasticity solution of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite cylindrical shell embedded in piezoelectric layers. Compos Struct 173:268–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nguyen-Quang K, Vo-Duy T, Dang-Trung H, Nguyen-Thoi T (2018) An isogeometric approach for dynamic response of laminated FG-CNT reinforced composite plates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 332:25–46MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rao MN, Schmidt R, Schröder K-U (2018) Forced vibration analysis of FG-graphene platelet reinforced polymer composite shells bonded with piezoelectric layers considering electroelastic nonlinearities. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2018 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems volume 1: development and characterization of multifunctional materials; modeling, simulation, and control of adaptive systems; integrated system design and implementation San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp 10–12Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rao MN, Schmidt R, Schröder K-U (2018) Modelling and analysis of piezolaminated functionally graded polymer composite structures reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets under strong electroelastic fields. Appl Mech Mater 875:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kiani Y, Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2018) Free vibration of FG-CNT reinforced composite skew cylindrical shells using the Chebyshev-Ritz formulation. Compos B Eng 147:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mindlin RD (1951) Influence of rotary inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic, elastic plates. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 18:31–38zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shi G (2007) A new simple third-order shear deformation theory of plates. Int J Solids Struct 44:4399–4417zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tzou HS, Ye R (1996) Analysis of piezoelastic structures with laminated piezoelectric triangle shell elements. AIAA J 34:110–115zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rao MN, Schmidt R (2015) Finite rotation FE-simulation and active vibration control of smart composite laminated structures. Comput Mech 55:719–735MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Frikha A, Zghal S, Dammak F (2018) Dynamic analysis of functionally graded carbon nanotubes-reinforced plate and shell structures using a double directors finite shell element. Aerosp Sci Technol 78:438–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Electromechanical Systems (LASEM), National Engineering School of SfaxUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations