Advertisement

On the MHD boundary layer flow with diffusion and chemical reaction over a porous flat plate with suction/blowing: two reliable methods

  • M. S. HashemiEmail author
  • A. Akgül
Original Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a Lie-group integrator based on \(GL_4(\mathbb {R})\) and the reproducing kernel functions has been constructed to investigate the flow characteristics in an electrically conducting second-grade fluid over a stretching sheet. Accurate initial values can be achieved when the target equation is matched precisely, and then, we can apply the group preserving scheme (GPS) to get a rather accurate results. On the other hand, the reproducing kernel method (RKM) is successfully applied to the underlying equation with convergence analysis. We show exact and approximate solutions by series in the reproducing kernel space. We use a bounded linear operator in the reproducing kernel space to get the solutions by the reproducing kernel method. Comparison of these two methods demonstrates the power and reliability. Finally, effects of magnetic parameter, viscoelastic parameter, stagnation-point flow, and stretching of the sheet parameters are illustrated.

Keywords

MHD boundary layer flow \(GL_4(\mathbb {R})\)-shooting Reproducing kernel functions Group preserving scheme 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for the helpful remarks and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Aronszajn N (1950) Theory of reproducing Kernels. Trans Am Math Soc 68:337–404MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abbasbandy S, Azarnavid B, Alhuthali MS (2015) A shooting reproducing Kernel Hilbert space method for multiple solutions of nonlinear boundary value problems. J Comput Appl Math 279:293–305MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arqub OA (2017) Fitted reproducing Kernel Hilbert space method for the solutions of some certain classes of time-fractional partial differential equations subject to initial and neumann boundary conditions. Comput Math Appl 73(6):1243–1261MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akgül A (2014) A new method for approximate solutions of fractional order boundary value problems. Neural Parallel Sci Comput 22(1–2):223–237MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akgül A (2015) New reproducing kernel functions. Math Probl Eng Art. ID 158134:10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abbasbandy S, Azarnavid B (2016) Some error estimates for the reproducing Kernel Hilbert spaces method. J Comput Appl Math 296:789–797MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arqub OA, Al-Smadi M, Shawagfeh N (2013) Solving Fredholm integro-differential equations using reproducing Kernel Hilbert space method. Appl Math Comput 219(17):8938–8948MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azarnavid B, Parand K (2018) An iterative reproducing Kernel method in Hilbert space for the multi-point boundary value problems. J Comput Appl Math 328:151–163MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babolian E, Javadi S, Moradi E (2016) Error analysis of reproducing Kernel Hilbert space method for solving functional integral equations. J Comput Appl Math 300:300–311MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bushnaq S, Momani S, Zhou Y (2013) A reproducing Kernel Hilbert space method for solving integro-differential equations of fractional order. J Optim Theory Appl 156(1):96–105MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bushnaq S, Maayah B, Ahmad M (2016) Reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for solving Fredholm integro-differential equations of fractional order. Ital J Pure Appl Math 36:307–318MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gumah G, Moaddy K, Al-Smadi M, Hashim I (2016) Solutions to uncertain Volterra integral equations by fitted reproducing kernel Hilbert space method. J Funct Sp. Art. ID 2920463:11Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sahihi H, Abbasbandy S, Allahviranloo T (2018) Reproducing Kernel method for solving singularly perturbed differential-difference equations with boundary layer behavior in Hilbert space. J Comput Appl Math 328:30–43MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dorodnitsyn V (2010) Applications of Lie groups to difference equations. CRC Press, LondonzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hairer E (2001) Geometric integration of ordinary differential equations on manifolds. BIT Numer Math 41(5):996–1007MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hairer E, Lubich C, Wanner G et al (2003) Geometric numerical integration illustrated by the Stormer–Verlet method. Acta Numer 12(12):399–450MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu C-S (2001) Cone of non-linear dynamical system and group preserving schemes. Int J Non-Linear Mech 36:1047–1068MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hashemi MS (2015) Constructing a new geometric numerical integration method to the nonlinear heat transfer equations. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 22(1):990–1001MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hashemi MS (2017) A novel simple algorithm for solving the magneto-hemodynamic flow in a semi-porous channel. Eur J Mech B Fluids 65:359–367MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hajiketabi M, Abbasbandy S, Casas F (2018) The lie-group method based on radial basis functions for solving nonlinear high dimensional generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony–Burgers equation in arbitrary domains. Appl Math Comput 321:223–243MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hajiketabi M, Abbasbandy S (2018) The combination of meshless method based on radial basis functions with a geometric numerical integration method for solving partial differential equations: Application to the heat equation. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 87:36–46MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbasbandy S, Van Gorder R, Hajiketabi M (2015) The lie-group shooting method for radial symmetric solutions of the yamabe equation. CMES 104(4):329–351Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ali F, Sheikh N, Khan I, Saqib M (2017) Magnetic field effect on blood flow of casson fluid in axisymmetric cylindrical tube: a fractional model. J Magn Magn Mater 423:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ali F, Jan S, Khan I, Gohar M, Sheikh N (2016) Solutions with special functions for time fractional free convection flow of brinkman type fluid. The European Physical Journal Plus 131:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ali F, Saqib M, Khan I, Sheikh N (2016) Application of Caputo–Fabrizio derivatives to MHD free convection flow of generalized walters’-b fluid model. Eur Phys J Plus 131:377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ali F, Sheikh N, Saqib M, Khan A (2017) Hidden phenomena of an MHD unsteady flow in porous medium with heat transfer. Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A. 8:110–116Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sheikh N, Ali F, Khan I, Saqib M (2017) A modern approach of Caputo-Fabrizio time-fractional derivative to MHD free convection flow of generalized second-grade fluid in a porous medium. Neural Comput Appl. 1–11Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saqib M, Ali F, Khan I, Sheikh N (2017) Heat and mass transfer phenomena in the flow of casson fluid over an infinite oscillating plate in the presence of first-order chemical reaction and slip effect. Neural Comput and Applic. 1–14Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saqib M, Ali F, Khan I, Sheikh N, Khan A (2017) MHD flow of micropolar fluid over an oscillating vertical plate embedded in porous media with constant temperature and concentration. Math Probl Eng 20Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zin N, Khan I, Shafie S, Exact and numerical solutions for unsteady heat and mass transfer problem of Jeffrey fluid with MHD and Newtonian heating effects. Neural Comput ApplGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khan I (2017) Shape effects of MoS2 nanoparticles on MHD slip flow of molybdenum disulphide nanofluid in a porous medium. J Mol Liq 233:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khan I, Gul A, Shaife S (2017) Effects of magnetic field on molybdenum disulfide nanofluids in mixed convection flow inside a channel filled with a saturated porous medium. J Porous Media 435–448Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khan N, Gul T, Islam S, Khan I, Alqahtani A, Alshomrani A (2017) Magnetohydrodynamic nanoliquid thin film sprayed on a stretching cylinder with heat transfer. Appl Sci 7:271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shivanian E, Jafarabadi A (2018) Capillary formation in tumor angiogenesis through meshless weak and strong local radial point interpolation. Eng Comput 34(3):603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shivanian E, Jafarabadi A (2017) An efficient numerical technique for solution of two-dimensional cubic nonlinear schrödinger equation with error analysis. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 83:74–86MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fatahi H, Saberi-Nadjafi J, Shivanian E (2016) A new spectral meshless radial point interpolation (smrpi) method for the two-dimensional fredholm integral equations on general domains with error analysis. J Comput Appl Math 294:196–209MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bhattacharyya K, Layek G (2012) Similarity solution of mhd boundary layer flow with diffusion and chemical reaction over a porous flat plate with suction/blowing. Meccanica 47(4):1043–1048MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abbasbandy S, Hayat T, Ghehsareh H, Alsaedi A (2013) Mhd Falkner–Skan flow of maxwell fluid by rational Chebyshev collocation method. Appl Math Mech 34(8):921–930MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shivanian E, Jafarabadi A (2018) Rayleigh-stokes problem for a heated generalized second grade fluid with fractional derivatives: a stable scheme based on spectral meshless radial point interpolation. Eng Comput 34(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mukhopadhyay S, Mandal IC (2015) Magnetohydrodynamic (mhd) mixed convection slip flow and heat transfer over a vertical porous plate. Eng Sci Technol Int J 18(1):98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bhattacharyya K, Arif MG, Pramanik WA (2012) Mhd boundary layer stagnation-point flow and mass transfer over a permeable shrinking sheet with suction/blowing and chemical reaction. Acta Tech 57(1):1–15MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Akgül A, Khan Y, Karatas Akgül E, Baleanu D, Al Qurashi M M (2017) Solutions of nonlinear systems by reproducing Kernel method. J Nonlinear Sci Appl 10(8):4408–4417MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al-Smadi M, Arqub OA, Shawagfeh N, Momani S (2016) Numerical investigations for systems of second-order periodic boundary value problems using reproducing Kernel method. Appl Math Comput 291:137–148MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Babolian E, Hamedzadeh D (2017) A splitting iterative method for solving second kind integral equations in reproducing Kernel spaces. J Comput Appl Math 326:204–216MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cheng RJ, Liew KM (2012) Analyzing two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation with the mesh-free reproducing Kernel particle Ritz method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 245(246):132–143MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Geng FZ, Qian SP (2015) Modified reproducing Kernel method for singularly perturbed boundary value problems with a delay. Appl Math Model 39(18):5592–5597MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jiang W, Chen Z (2013) Solving a system of linear Volterra integral equations using the new reproducing Kernel method. Appl Math Comput 219(20):10225–10230MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yang C-T (2013) Application of reproducing Kernel particle method and element-free Galerkin method on the simulation of the membrane of capacitive micromachined microphone in viscothermal air. Comput Mech 51(3):295–308MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Akgül A, Hashemi MS, Inc M, Raheem SA (2017) Constructing two powerful methods to solve the Thomas–Fermi equation. Nonlinear Dyn 87(2):1435–1444MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hashemi MS, Darvishi E, Baleanu D (2016) A geometric approach for solving the density dependent diffusion Nagumo equation. Adv Differ Equ 1:1–13MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Akgül A, Hashemi MS et al (2017) Group preserving scheme and reproducing Kernel method for the Poisson–Boltzmann equation for semiconductor devices. Nonlinear Dyn 88(4):2817–2829MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hashemi MS, Abbasbandy S (2017) A geometric approach for solving Troesch’s problem. Bull Malay Math Sci Soc 40(1):97–116MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hashemi MS, Baleanu D, Parto-Haghighi M (2015) A lie group approach to solve the fractional Poisson equation. Rom J Phys 60(9–10):1289–1297Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hashemi MS, Baleanu D, Parto-Haghighi M, Darvishi E (2015) Solving the time-fractional diffusion equation using a lie group integrator. Rom J Phys 19:S77–S83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of BonabBonabIran
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Art and Science FacultySiirt UniversitySiirtTurkey

Personalised recommendations