Advertisement

Engineering with Computers

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 175–190 | Cite as

Application of dual-Chebyshev wavelets for the numerical solution of boundary integral equations with logarithmic singular kernels

  • Pouria AssariEmail author
  • Mehdi Dehghan
Original Article
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the discrete Galerkin method based on dual-Chebyshev wavelets has been presented to approximate the solution of boundary integral equations of the second kind with logarithmic singular kernels. These types of integral equations occur as a reformulation of a boundary value problem of Laplace’s equation with linear Robin boundary conditions. The discrete Galerkin methods for solving logarithmic boundary integral equations with Chebyshev wavelets as a basis encounter difficulties for computing their singular integrals. To overcome this problem, we establish the dual-Chebyshev wavelets, such that they are orthonormal without any weight functions. This property adapts Chebyshev wavelets to discrete Galerkin method for solving logarithmic boundary integral equations. We obtain the error bound for the scheme and find that the convergence rate of the proposed method is of \(O(2^{-Mk})\). Finally, some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the new technique and confirm the theoretical error analysis.

Keywords

Boundary integral equation Laplace’s equation Logarithmic singular kernel Dual-Chebyshev wavelet Discrete Galerkin method Error analysis 

Mathematics Subject Classification

45A05 45E99 65L10 65T60 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions which have improved the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Adibi H, Assari P (2010) Chebyshev wavelet method for numerical solution of Fredholm integral equations of the first kind. Math. Probl. EngGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adibi H, Assari P (2011) On the numerical solution of weakly singular Fredholm integral equations of the second kind using Legendre wavelets. J Vib Control 17:689–698MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alpert BK (1993) A class of bases in \(l^2\) for the sparse representation of integral operators. SIAM J Math Anal 24(1):246–262MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Assari P, Adibi H, Dehghan M (2014) A meshless discrete Galerkin (MDG) method for the numerical solution of integral equations with logarithmic kernels. J Comput Appl Math 267:160–181MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assari P, Dehghan M (2017) A meshless discrete collocation method for the numerical solution of singular-logarithmic boundary integral equations utilizing radial basis functions. Appl Math Comput 315:424–444MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Assari P, Dehghan M (2018) Solving a class of nonlinear boundary integral equations based on the meshless local discrete Galerkin (MLDG) method. Appl Numer Math 123:137–158MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Assari P, Dehghan M (2018) A meshless Galerkin scheme for the approximate solution of nonlinear logarithmic boundary integral equations utilizing radial basis functions. J Comput Appl Math 333:362–381MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Assari P, Dehghan M (2018) Application of thin plate splines for solving a class of boundary integral equations arisen from Laplace’s equations with nonlinear boundary conditions. Int. J. Comput. Math.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2017.1420786
  9. 9.
    Atkinson K, Bogomolny A (1987) The discrete Galerkin method for integral equations. Math Comp 48(178):31–38MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson KE (1997) The numerical solution of integral equations of the second kind. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Babolian E, Fattahzadeh F (2007) Numerical computation method in solving integral equations by using Chebyshev wavelet operational matrix of integration. Appl Math Comput 188(1):1016–1022MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Babolian E, Fattahzadeh F (2007) Numerical solution of differential equations by using Chebyshev wavelet operational matrix of integration. Appl Math Comput 188(1):417–426MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biazar J, Ebrahimi H (2012) Chebyshev wavelets approach for nonlinear systems of Volterra integral equations. Comput Math Appl 63(3):608–616MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boersma J, Danicki E (1993) On the solution of an integral equation arising in potential problems for circular and elliptic disks. SIAM J Appl Math 53(4):931–941MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bremer Rokhlin V, J., and I. Sammis. (2010) Universal quadratures for boundary integral equations on two-dimensional domains with corners. J. Comput. Physics 229:8259–8280Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen W, Lin W (2001) Galerkin trigonometric wavelet methods for the natural boundary integral equations. Appl Math Comput 121(1):75–92MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dehghan M, Mirzaei D (2008) Numerical solution to the unsteady two-dimensional Schrodinger equation using meshless local boundary integral equation method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76(4):501–520MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang W, Wang Y, Xu Y (2004) An implementation of fast wavelet Galerkin methods for integral equations of the second kind. J Sci Comput 20(2):277–302MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao J, Jiang Y (2008) Trigonometric Hermite wavelet approximation for the integral equations of second kind with weakly singular kernel. J Comput Appl Math 215(1):242–259MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghasemi M, Tavassoli M (2011) Kajani. Numerical solution of time-varying delay systems by Chebyshev wavelets. Appl Math Model 35(11):5235–5244MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harbrecht H, Schneider R (2006) Wavelet Galerkin schemes for boundary integral equations—implementation and quadrature. SIAM J Sci Comput 27(4):1347–1370MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaneko H, Xu Y (1994) Gauss-type quadratures for weakly singular integrals and their application to Fredholm integral equations of the second kind. Math Comp 62(206):739–753MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khuri SA, Wazwaz AM (1996) The decomposition method for solving a second kind Fredholm integral equation with a logarithmic kernel. Intern J Comput Math 61(1–2):103–110zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khuri SA, Sayfy A (2010) A numerical approach for solving an extended Fisher-Kolomogrov-Petrovskii-Piskunov equation. J Comput Appl Math 233(8):2081–2089MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kress B (1989) Linear Integral Equations. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lepik U (2008) Solving integral and differential equations by the aid of non-uniform Haar wavelets. Appl Math Comput 198(1):326–332MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li X (2011) The meshless Galerkin boundary node method for Stokes problems in three dimensions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:442–472MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li X (2011) Meshless Galerkin algorithms for boundary integral equations with moving least square approximations. Appl Numer Math 61(12):1237–1256MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li X, Zhu J (2009) A Galerkin boundary node method and its convergence analysis. J Comput Appl Math 230(1):314–328MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li X, Zhu J (2009) A Galerkin boundary node method for biharmonic problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 33(6):858–865MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li X, Zhu J (2009) A meshless Galerkin method for Stokes problems using boundary integral equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2874–2885MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mirzaei D, Dehghan M (2009) Implementation of meshless LBIE method to the 2D non-linear SG problem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79(13):1662–1682MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Quarteroni A, Sacco R, Saleri F (2007) Numerical mathematics, 2nd ed, texts in applied mathematics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sohrabi S (2011) Comparison Chebyshev wavelets method with BPFs method for solving Abel’s integral equation. Ain Shams Eng J 2(3–4):249–254Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tang X, Pang Z, Zhu T, Liu J (2007) Wavelet numerical solutions for weakly singular Fredholm integral equations of the second kind. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 12(3):437–441MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Von Petersdorff T, Schwab C (1996) Wavelet approximations for first kind boundary integral equations on polygons. Numer Math 74(4):479–519MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang Y, Fan Q (2012) The second kind Chebyshev wavelet method for solving fractional differential equations. Appl Math Comput 218(17):8592–8601MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wazwaz AM (2011) Linear and Nonlinear Integral equations: methods and applications. Higher Education Press and Springer Verlag, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wazwaz AM, Rach R, Duan J (2013) The modified Adomian decomposition method and the noise terms phenomenon for solving nonlinear weakly-singular Volterra and Fredholm integral equations. Cent Eur J Eng 3(4):669–678Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yousefi SA, Banifatemi A (2006) Numerical solution of Fredholm integral equations by using CAS wavelets. Appl Math Comput 183:458–463MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yousefi SA, Razzaghi M (2005) Legendre wavelets method for the nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integral equations. Math Comput Simul 70:1–8MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yousefi SA (2006) Numerical solution of Abel’s integral equation by using Legendre wavelets. Appl Math Comput 175:574–580MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang P, Zhang Y (2000) Wavelet method for boundary integral equations. J Comput Math 18(1):25–42MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhe W (2014) Haar wavelet for the natural boundary integral equation. Appl Mech Mater 17:1569–1573Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhu L, Fan Q (2012) Solving fractional nonlinear Fredholm integro-differential equations by the second kind Chebyshev wavelet. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17(6):2333–2341MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of SciencesBu-Ali Sina UniversityHamedanIran
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer SciencesAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations