An integrated modelling approach for the representation and embodiment of engineering systems with standard components
- 52 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
In today’s global markets the commercial success of a product, however defined, is highly dependent upon the rapid and efficient transformation of an engineering system from a design schema to a fully embodied optimal solution. The ability of the designer to achieve this is severely frustrated by the analytically intensive and time-consuming aspects of embodying a concept. This is particularly the case where standard components have to be considered. This paper presents a new modelling approach that supports the designer during the transformation of a concept to an embodied solution. This modelling approach provides for the representation of conceptual schemas and their subsequent embodiment with standard components from third-party electronic representations. The modelling strategies and associated software issues for representing a mechanical system, handling the interactions between components and incorporating the governing representations for the design and selection of individual components are discussed. The process of constructing a system model, specifying the desired performance characteristics and the process of system resolution are also described. The paper concludes with an industrial case study which is used to demonstrate the capabilities and potential of the new approach for supporting the embodiment of systems and the important task of design synthesis.
Keywords
Systems modelling Machine systems Embodiment Standard componentsNotes
Acknowledgements
The work reported in this paper has been undertaken as part of the EPSRC Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre at The University of Bath (grant reference GR/R67507/01).
References
- 1.Shakar SR, Jansson DG (1993) A eneralised methodology for evaluating manufacturability; concurrent engineering. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Allen RD, Hicks BJ, Culley SJ (2000) Integrating electronic information for the design of mechanical systems: the designers perspective. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Multi-Conference on Systematics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL, July 2000Google Scholar
- 3.Ullman DG (1992) The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wallace AP (1995) The modelling of engineering assemblies based on standard catalogue components. Master’s thesis, University of BathGoogle Scholar
- 5.Culley SJ, Webber SJ (1992) Implementation requirements for electronic standard component catalogues. Proc Inst Mech Eng, J Eng Manufact B 206:253–260Google Scholar
- 6.Flood RL, Carson ER (1988) Dealing with complexity: an introduction to theory and application of systems science. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Papalambros PY, Wilde DJ (1988) Principles of optimal design: modelling and computation. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ashby MF (1998) Cambridge materials selector. Dept. of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- 9.Culley SJ, Theobold G (1996) Dealing with standard components for knowledge intensive CAD, knowledge intensive CAD, vol 2. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC5 WG5.2 International conference on knowledge intensive CAD, Lancaster, UK, 16–18 December 1996Google Scholar
- 10.Richards TG, Hughes EJ, Tilley DG (1999) A multimedia approach to fluid power systems design. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Florence, Italy, 7–11 June 1999Google Scholar
- 11.Counsell J, Porter I, Dawson D, Duffy M (1999) Schemebuilder: computer aided knowledge based design of mechatronic systems. Assem Automat 19:2:129–138Google Scholar
- 12.Keown J (1994) Pspice and Circuit Analysis. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.AMESIM (2000)http://www.amesim.com/amesim.htm. Cited 2000
- 14.Ward AC, Seering WP (1989) The performance of a mechanical design compiler. ASME Des Eng 17:89–97Google Scholar
- 15.Hicks BJ, Culley SJ, Mullineux G (2001) Integrating engineering component representations for the design and synthesis of mechanical systems. Proc ICED 1:437–444MATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hicks BJ, Culley SJ (1999) A flexible representation of engineering assemblies for an integrated modelling environment. Proc ICED 99:1113–1116Google Scholar
- 17.Hicks BJ, Culley SJ (2000) A protocol for communication in a component based modelling infrastructure. Institut Mech Eng J Eng Manufact B 215(B4):453–464Google Scholar
- 18.Hicks BJ, Culley SJ (2002) Compatibility issues for mechanical system modelling with standard components. Institut Mech Eng J Eng Manufact B 216(B2):235–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kusiak A, Larson N (1995) Decomposition and representation methods on mechanical design; American Society of Mechanical Engineers. J Mech Des 117:17–24Google Scholar
- 21.Culley SJ, Theobold G (1997) Dealing with standard components for knowledge intensive CAD. Proc of IFIP TC5 WG5.2 1997Google Scholar
- 22.Allen RD, Hicks BJ, Culley SJ (2001) Integrating electronic information for mechanical systems design. J Tech Manag 1(4):367–384Google Scholar
- 23.Engelmore R, More T (1988) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Sreeram RT (2000) Resolving conflicts in agent-supported collaborative product development. Dissertation, University of BathGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hicks BJ (2001) The representation of engineering systems for building, embodiment and optimisation with standard components. Dissertation, University of BathGoogle Scholar