Engineering with Computers

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 271–283

A best practice advice system to support automotive engineering analysis processes

  • C. A. McMahon
  • Y. Liu
  • R. Crossland
  • D. Brown
  • D. Leal
  • J. Devlukia
Original Article


Engineering design teams today are often widely distributed, and design authority is shared between collaborating companies. Technology is changing rapidly, and understanding of the most appropriate approach to the application of engineering assessment tools is developing accordingly. There is therefore a need to support coordination and auditing of engineering processes, and to provide best practice advice. This paper describes a computing approach to the provision of best practice advice within a workflow-enabled engineering computing environment. The engineering context is described using a formal information model for automotive engineering analysis processes, embedded in an object database. This same model is used to associate best practice advice documents with the engineering context. The best practice adviser (BPA) system assembles four types of information: general information that is pertinent to a particular activity, irrespective of the context in which it is taking place; context-specific information that is pertinent to the particular circumstance in which an activity is taking place; errors and warnings that may be encountered in the activity, especially when software is being used, and examples of previous application of the activity in related contexts. The BPA is implemented in a three-tier architecture using server pages technology. In the absence of any suitable matching information for a particular context in the BPA database, the BPA Server can execute a “close-match” algorithm which searches the database for information that is provided on contexts that are close to the user’s interest. The paper describes the initial implementation and population of the BPA, and presents some early feedback from prototype trials.


Best practice advice Adaptive hypermedia Engineering analysis Engineering repository 


  1. 1.
    Balbontin A, Yazdani B (1999) Global new product development strategies and I.T. applications. ASME DETC’99, Paper EIM-9007, Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitney DE, Dong Q, Judson J, Mascoli G (1999) Introducing knowledge-based engineering into an interconnected product development process. ASME DETC’99, Paper DTM-8741, Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt J, Feldmann D (2001) A web-based information tool for application engineering. Proc 13th Int Conf on Engineering Design (ICED01), Glasgow, Scotland, August 2001Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nett E (1996) ADVANCE – Advancing common basic services for distributed concurrent engineering. ESPRIT Project 8148 Cited March 2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    INTEREST Consortium (2001) INTEREST INTegrated Environment for durability & REliability design Support Tools (1997–2000) ESPRIT AIT Project 25584. Cited March 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Samtech SA (2001) Boss Quattro Specifications v4.1. Cited October 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salzberg S, Watkins M (1990) Managing information for concurrent engineering: challenges and barriers. Res Eng Des 2(1):35–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Konda S, Monarch I, Sargent P, Subrahmanian E (1992) Shared memory in design: a unifying theme for research and practice. Res Eng Des 4:23–42Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank D (1999) The importance of knowledge management for BMW. Proc Int Conf on Engineering Design (ICED99), Munich, August, pp 33–41Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vajna S, Burchardt C, Richter A (1999) Organizing integrated product development with network structures. Proc 12th Int Conf on Engineering Design (ICED99), Munich, pp 393–396Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leymann F, Roller D (1998) Workflow-based applications. IBM Syst J 36(1):102–123Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1990) Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Bus Rev, Jan-FebGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hammer M, Stanton S (1999) How process enterprises really work. Harvard Bus Rev, Nov-DecGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan J, Li Z, Raghunath A (1999) ActiveProcess: a process-driven and agent-based approach to supporting collaborative engineering. Proc ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC-99/CIE-9099, Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    NASA (2003) The NASA Lessons Learned Information System. Cited March 2003Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhuang Y, Chen L, Venter R (2000) CyberEye: an internet-enabled environment to support collaborative design. Concurrent Eng–Res A 8(3):213–229Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nicholas C, Mayfield J (eds)(1997) Intelligent hypertext: advanced techniques for the World Wide Web. Lect Notes Comput Sc 1326Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brusilovsky P (1996) Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Model User-Adap 6(2–3):87–129Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stern MK, Woolf BP (2000) Adaptive content in an online lecture system. In: Brusilovsky P, Stock O, Strappavara C (eds) Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive Web-based systems. Proc Adaptive Hypermedia 2000, Trento, Italy, August. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1892:227–238Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwarz E (1998) Self-organized goal-oriented tutoring in adaptive hypermedia environments. In: Goettl B, Halff HM, Redfield CL, Shute VJ (eds) Intelligent tutoring systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1452:294–303Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geldof S, Van de Velde W (1997) Context-sensitive hypertext generation. Working Notes of the AAAI’97 Spring Symposium Workshop on Natural Language Processing for the Web, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, pp 54–61Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bental D, Cawsey A, Pearson J, Jones R (2000) Adapting web-based information to the needs of patients with cancer. In: Brusilovsky P, Stock O, Strappavara C (Eds) Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive Web-based systems. Proc Adaptive Hypermedia 2000, Trento, Italy, August. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1892:27–37Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    NHS Information Authority (2001) NHSIA – Clinical Terminology and Classification Services. Cited October 2001Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    STEPCom (2001) The Epistle Core Model v4. Cited October 2001Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rolls-Royce/PDES Inc/BSI/CAESAR Systems (2000) Engineering Analysis Core Model. Cited March 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Owen J (1993) STEP: An Introduction. Information Geometers, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ulmann DG (1995) A taxonomy for classifying engineering decision problems and support systems. AI EDAM 9:427–438Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dong A, Agogino A (1997) Text analysis for constructing design representations. AI EDAM 11(2):65–75CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Netscape Communications Inc (2003) Open Directory Project. Cited March 2003Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lauritzen S, Spiegelhalter D (1988) Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 50:157–224MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hancq DA, Walters AJ, Beuth JL (2000) Development of an object-oriented fatigue tool. Eng Comput 16(2):131–144CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Macromedia Corporation (2001) ColdFusion 5 Cited October 2001Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pitt E, McNiff K (2001) Java.RMI: the Remote Method Invocation guide. Addison Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maier R (2002) Knowledge management systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sveiby K, Simons R (2002) Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work – an empirical study. J Knowledge Management 6(5)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Manage J 21:345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. OUP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holsapple CW, Joshi KD (1999) Description and analysis of existing knowledge management frameworks. Proc of the 32nd Hawaii Int Conf on System Sciences. Cited October 2001Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    APQC (2003) American Productivity and Quality Centre. Cited March 2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. McMahon
    • 1
  • Y. Liu
    • 2
  • R. Crossland
    • 2
  • D. Brown
    • 3
  • D. Leal
    • 3
  • J. Devlukia
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.Cedar LtdLondonUK
  4. 4.Land RoverWarwickUK

Personalised recommendations