Statistical Papers

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 993–1007 | Cite as

Consistent estimation for discretely observed Markov jump processes with an absorbing state

  • Alexander Kremer
  • Rafael WeißbachEmail author
Regular Article


For a continuous-time Markov process, commonly, only discrete-time observations are available. We analyze multiple observations of a homogeneous Markov jump process with an absorbing state. We establish consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator, as the number of Markov processes increases. To accomplish uniform convergence in the continuous mapping theorem, we use the continuity of the transition probability in the parameters, the compactness of the parameter space and the boundedness of probabilities. We allow for a stochastic time-grid of observation points with different intensities for each observation process. Furthermore, we account for right censoring. The estimate is obtained via the EM algorithm with an E-step given in closed form. In our empirical application of credit rating histories, we fit the model of Weißbach and Mollenhauer (J Korean Stat Soc 40:469–485, 2011) and find marked differences, compared to the continuous-time analysis.


Multiple markov jump process Credit rating Discrete observations EM Parametric maximum likelihood 



We would like to thank Friedrich Liese for his valuable suggestions. The financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is also gratefully acknowledged (Grant WE3573/2). All computations have been processed in MATLAB.


  1. Aït-Sahalia Y (2002) Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions: a closed-form approximation approach. Econometrica 70:223–262MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Aït-Sahalia Y, Jacod J (2009) Testing for jumps in a discretely observed process. Ann Stat 37:184–222CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Amann H (1997) Gewöhnliche Differentialgleichungen. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Billingsley P (1961) Statistical inference for Markov processes. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bladt M, Sørensen M (2005) Statistical inference for discretely observed Markov jump processes. J R Stat Soc Ser B 67:395–410CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bladt M, Sørensen M (2009) Efficient estimation of transition rates between credit ratings from observations at discrete time points. Quant Finance 9:147–160MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehay D, Yao JF (2007) On likelihood estimation for discretely observed Markov jump processes. Aust NZ J Stat 49:93–107MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B 39:1–38MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Guttorp P (1995) Stochastic modeling of scientific data. Chapman & Hall, Suffolk, Great BritainzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarrow R, Lando D, Turnbull S (1997) A Markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads. Rev Financial Stud 10:481–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim Y-D, James L, Weißbach R (2012) Bayesian analysis of multi-state event history data: beta-Dirichlet process prior. Biometrika 99:127–140MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Keiding N (1974) Estimation in the birth process. Biometrika 61:71–80MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Keiding N (1975) Maximum likelihood estimation in the birth-and-death process. Ann Stat 3:363–372MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobolth A, Jensen JL (2005) Statistical inference in evolutionary models of DNA sequances via the EM algorithm. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 4:18MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Koopman S, Lucas A, Schwaab B (2011) Modeling frailty-correlated defaults using many macroeconomic covariates. J Econom 162:312–325MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Küchler U, Sørensen M (1997) Exponential families of stochastic processes. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Liese F, Miescke KJ (2008) Statistical decision theory: estimation, testing, and selection. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Mählmann T (2006) Estimation of rating class transition probabilities with incomplete data. J Banking Finance 30:3235–3256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenow B, Weißbach R (2010) Modelling correlations in credit portfolio risk. J Risk Manag Financial Inst 3:16–30Google Scholar
  20. van der Vaart A, Wellner J (1996) Weak convergence and empirical processes—with applications to statistics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Weißbach R, Mollenhauer T (2011) Modelling rating transitions. J Korean Stat Soc 40:469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weißbach R, Walter R (2010) A likelihood ratio test for stationarity of rating transitions. J Econom 155: 188–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economic and Social SciencesInstitute for Economics, University of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations