Statistical Papers

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 523–539

# Using p values to design statistical process control charts

• Zhonghua Li
• Peihua Qiu
• Snigdhansu Chatterjee
• Zhaojun Wang
Regular Article

## Abstract

Conventional Phase II statistical process control (SPC) charts are designed using control limits; a chart gives a signal of process distributional shift when its charting statistic exceeds a properly chosen control limit. To do so, we only know whether a chart is out-of-control at a given time. It is therefore not informative enough about the likelihood of a potential distributional shift. In this paper, we suggest designing the SPC charts using p values. By this approach, at each time point of Phase II process monitoring, the p value of the observed charting statistic is computed, under the assumption that the process is in-control. If the p value is less than a pre-specified significance level, then a signal of distributional shift is delivered. This p value approach has several benefits, compared to the conventional design using control limits. First, after a signal of distributional shift is delivered, we could know how strong the signal is. Second, even when the p value at a given time point is larger than the significance level, it still provides us useful information about how stable the process performs at that time point. The second benefit is especially useful when we adopt a variable sampling scheme, by which the sampling time can be longer when we have more evidence that the process runs stably, supported by a larger p value. To demonstrate the p value approach, we consider univariate process monitoring by cumulative sum control charts in various cases.

### Keywords

Bootstrap Cumulative sum control charts Process monitoring Self-starting Variable sampling

## Preview

### References

1. Chatterjee S, Qiu P (2009) Distribution-free cumulative sum control charts using bootstrap-based control limits. Ann Appl Stat 3(1): 349–369
2. Costa AFB (1998) Joint $${\overline{X}}$$ and R charts with variable parameters. IIE Trans 30: 505–514Google Scholar
3. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7: 1–26
4. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton
5. Grigg OA, Spiegelhalter DJ (2008) An empirical approximation to the null unbounded steady-state distribution of the cumulative sum statistic. Technometrics 50: 501–511
6. Hawkins DM (1969) On the distribution and power of a test for a single outlier. South Afr Stat J 3: 9–15Google Scholar
7. Hawkins DM (1987) Self-starting CUSUM charts for location and scale. Statistician 36(4): 299–316
8. Hawkins DM, Olwell DH (1998) Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvement. Springer, Berlin
9. Hawkins DM, Qiu P, Kang CW (2003) The change point model for statistical process control. J Qual Technol 35(4): 355–366Google Scholar
10. Jensen WA, Jones-Farmer LA, Champ CW, Woodall WH (2006) Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties a literature review. J Qual Technol 38(4): 349–364Google Scholar
11. Jones LA (2002) The statistical design of EWMA control charts with estimated parameters. J Qual Technol 34(3): 277–288Google Scholar
12. Jones LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (2001) The performance of exponentially weighted moving average charts with estimated parameters. Technometrics 43(2): 156–167
13. Jones LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (2004) The run length distribution of the CUSUM with estimated parameters. J Qual Technol 36(1): 95–108Google Scholar
14. Lehmann EL (1997) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer, New York
15. Li Y, Tsung F (2009) False discovery rate-adjusted charting schemes for multistage process monitoring and fault identification. Technometrics 51: 186–205
16. Lucas JM, Saccucci MS (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes Properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32: 1–12
17. Luo Y, Li Z., Wang Z (2009) Adaptive CUSUM control chart with variable sampling intervals. Comput Stat Data Anal 53: 2693–2701
18. Montgomery DC (2004) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5 edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
19. Montgomery DC (2007) SPC research—current trends. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23: 515–516
20. Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 42: 243–254Google Scholar
21. Qiu P, Hawkins DM (2001) A rank based multivariate CUSUM procedure. Technometrics 43: 120–132
22. Qiu P, Li Z (2011) On nonparametric statistical process control of univariate processes. Technometrics 53: 390–405
23. Quesenberry CP (1991) SPC Q charts for start-up processes and short or long runs. J Qual Technol 23(3): 213–224Google Scholar
24. Reynolds MR Jr., Amin RW, Arnold JC Jr. (1990) CUSUM charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics 32(4): 371–384
25. Reynolds MR, Arnold JC (2001) EWMA control charts with variable sample sizes and variable sampling intervals. IIE Trans 33: 511–530Google Scholar
26. Roberts GC (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving average. Technometrics 1: 239–250
27. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
28. Wu Z, Zhang S, Wang P (2007) A CUSUM scheme with variable sample sizes and sampling intervals for monitoring the process mean and variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23: 157–170
29. Zhou C, Zou C, Zhang Y, Wang Z (2009) Nonparametric control chart based on change-point model. Stat Papers 50: 13–28

## Authors and Affiliations

• Zhonghua Li
• 1
• Peihua Qiu
• 2
• Snigdhansu Chatterjee
• 2
• Zhaojun Wang
• 1
1. 1.LPMC and School of Mathematical SciencesNankai UniversityTianjinChina
2. 2.School of StatisticsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA