A comparison of Bayesian model selection based on MCMC with an application to GARCH-type models
- 348 Downloads
This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparison of five computational methods for Bayesian model selection, based on MCMC simulations from posterior model parameter distributions. We apply these methods to a well-known and important class of models in financial time series analysis, namely GARCH and GARCH-t models for conditional return distributions (assuming normal and t-distributions). We compare their performance with the more common maximum likelihood-based model selection for simulated and real market data. All five MCMC methods proved reliable in the simulation study, although differing in their computational demands. Results on simulated data also show that for large degrees of freedom (where the t-distribution becomes more similar to a normal one), Bayesian model selection results in better decisions in favor of the true model than maximum likelihood. Results on market data show the instability of the harmonic mean estimator and reliability of the advanced model selection methods.
Key wordsBayesian inference Bayesian model selection GARCH models Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model likelihood
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. and Nelson, D., (1994). ARCH models, in R. Engle and D. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Gelman, A. and Rubin, D., (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion), Statistical Science 7: 457–511.Google Scholar
- Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar
- Geweke, J., (1993). Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 19–40.Google Scholar
- Geweke, J. (1995). Bayesian comparison of econometric models. Working Papers 532, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- Jaffreys, H., (1961). Theory of Probability, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Kleibergen, F. and van Dijk, H., (1993). Non-stationarity in GARCH models: a Bayesian analysis, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 41–61.Google Scholar
- Miazhynskaia, T., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. and Dorffner, G. (2004). Bayesian testing for non-linearity in volatility modeling, Technical report, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelegence.Google Scholar
- Raftery, A. and Lewis, S. (1992). How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 763–773.Google Scholar
- Shephard, N., (1996). Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in D. Cox, D. V. Hinkley and O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen (eds), Time Series Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging, Technical report, Statistics Department, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar