Statistical Papers

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 525–549 | Cite as

A comparison of Bayesian model selection based on MCMC with an application to GARCH-type models

  • Tatiana Miazhynskaia
  • Georg Dorffner
Articles

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparison of five computational methods for Bayesian model selection, based on MCMC simulations from posterior model parameter distributions. We apply these methods to a well-known and important class of models in financial time series analysis, namely GARCH and GARCH-t models for conditional return distributions (assuming normal and t-distributions). We compare their performance with the more common maximum likelihood-based model selection for simulated and real market data. All five MCMC methods proved reliable in the simulation study, although differing in their computational demands. Results on simulated data also show that for large degrees of freedom (where the t-distribution becomes more similar to a normal one), Bayesian model selection results in better decisions in favor of the true model than maximum likelihood. Results on market data show the instability of the harmonic mean estimator and reliability of the advanced model selection methods.

Key words

Bayesian inference Bayesian model selection GARCH models Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model likelihood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauwens, L. and Lubrano, M., (1998). Bayesian inference on GARCH models using Gibbs sampler, Econometrics Journal 1: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bollerslev, T., (1986). A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–327.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. and Nelson, D., (1994). ARCH models, in R. Engle and D. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Carlin, B. and Louis, T., (1996). Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Chapman&Hall, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chib, S., (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (432): 1313–1321.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chib, S. and Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis- Hastings output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96(453): 270–281.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., (1995). Bayesian model discrimination and Bayes factor for linear Gaussian state space models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 57: 237–246.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2004). Estimating marginal likelihoods for mixture and Markov switching models using bridge sampling techniques, The Econometrics Journal 7: 143–167.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelfand, A. and Dey, D., (1994). Bayesian model choice: Asymptotic and exact calculations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 501–514.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelfand, A. and Smith, A., (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 398–409.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelman, A. and Rubin, D., (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion), Statistical Science 7: 457–511.Google Scholar
  12. Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar
  13. Geweke, J., (1993). Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 19–40.Google Scholar
  14. Geweke, J. (1995). Bayesian comparison of econometric models. Working Papers 532, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  15. Green, P., (1995). Reversible jump MCMC computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika 82: 711–732.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hastings, W., (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57: 97–109.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffreys, H., (1961). Theory of Probability, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Kass, R. and Raftery, A., (1995). Bayes factor, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 773–792.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufmann, S. and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2002). Bayesian analysis of switching ARCH models, Journal of Time Series Analysis 23(4): 425–458.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, S., Shephard, N. and Chib, S., (1998). Stochastic volatility: Likelihood inference and comparison with ARCH models, Review of Economic Studies 65: 361–393.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleibergen, F. and van Dijk, H., (1993). Non-stationarity in GARCH models: a Bayesian analysis, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 41–61.Google Scholar
  22. Lavine, M. and Scherrish, M., (1999). Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not, The American Statistician 53: 119–122.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng, X. and Wong, W., (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity, Statistical Sinica 6: 831–860.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Miazhynskaia, T., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. and Dorffner, G. (2004). Bayesian testing for non-linearity in volatility modeling, Technical report, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelegence.Google Scholar
  25. Müller, P. and Pole, A., (1998). Monte Carlo posterior integration in GARCH models, Sankhya—The Indian Journal of Statistics 60: 127–144.MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakatsuma, T. (2000). Bayesian analysis of ARMA-GARCH models: a Markov chain sampling approach, Journal of Econometrics 95: 57–69.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newton, M. and Raftery, A., (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 1–48.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Raftery, A. and Lewis, S. (1992). How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 763–773.Google Scholar
  29. Schwarz, G., (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Shephard, N., (1996). Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in D. Cox, D. V. Hinkley and O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen (eds), Time Series Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
  31. Tierney, L., (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions, Annals of Statistics 21: 1701–1762.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. Vrontos, I., Dellaportas, P. and Politis, D. (2000). Full Bayesian inference for GARCH and EGARCH models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistic 18(2):187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging, Technical report, Statistics Department, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Miazhynskaia
    • 1
  • Georg Dorffner
    • 2
  1. 1.Austrian Research Institute for Artificial IntelligenceViennaAustria
  2. 2.Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Department of Medical Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, Center for Brain ResearchMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations