Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology B

, Volume 184, Issue 2, pp 273–284 | Cite as

The fur of mammals in exposed environments; do crypsis and thermal needs necessarily conflict? The polar bear and marsupial koala compared

  • Terence J. DawsonEmail author
  • Koa N. Webster
  • Shane K. Maloney
Original Paper

Abstract

The furs of mammals have varied and complex functions. Other than for thermoregulation, fur is involved in physical protection, sensory input, waterproofing and colouration, the latter being important for crypsis or camouflage. Some of these diverse functions potentially conflict. We have investigated how variation in cryptic colouration and thermal features may interact in the coats of mammals and influence potential heat inflows from solar radiation, much of which is outside the visible spectral range. The coats of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and the marsupial koala (Phascolarctus cinereus) have insulative similarities but, while they feature cryptic colouration, they are of contrasting colour, i.e. whitish and dark grey. The reflectance of solar radiation by coats was measured across the full solar spectrum using a spectroradiometer. The modulation of incident solar radiation and resultant heat flows in these coats were determined at a range of wind speeds by mounting them on a heat flux transducer/temperature-controlled plate apparatus in a wind tunnel. A lamp with a spectral distribution of radiation similar to the solar spectrum was used as a proxy for the sun. Crypsis by colour matching was apparent within the visible spectrum for the two species, U. maritimus being matched against snow and P. cinereus against Eucalyptus forest foliage. While reflectances across the full solar spectrum differed markedly, that of U. maritimus being 66 % as opposed to 10 % for P. cinereus, the heat influxes from solar radiation reaching the skin were similar. For both coats at low wind speed (1 m s−1), 19 % of incident solar radiation impacted as heat at the skin surface; at higher wind speed (10 m s−1) this decreased to approximately 10 %. Ursus maritimus and P. cinereus have high and comparable levels of fur insulation and although the patterns of reflectance and depths of penetrance of solar radiation differ for the coats, the considerable insulation limited the radiant heat reaching the skin. These data suggest that generally, if mammal coats have high insulation then heat flow from solar radiation into an animal is much restricted and the impact of coat colour is negligible. However, comparisons with published data from other species suggest that as fur insulation decreases, colour increasingly influences the heat inflow associated with solar radiation.

Keywords

Insulation Reflectance Absorptivity Fur colour Solar radiation Thermoregulation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Steven Amstrup of the USGS in Alaska for kindly supplying the polar bear pelts. Dr. Chris Leigh of the Department of Anatomical Sciences, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, is also thanked for help in the acquisition of the koala pelts. Professor Steven Dain of the School of Optometry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW is thanked for providing access to the spectrophotometer and to Lina Critelli and Annette Hoskins for instruction in the use of the machine.

References

  1. Bohren CF, Sardie JM (1981) Utilization of solar radiation by polar bears: an optical model for pelts; an alternative explanation. Appl Optics 20:1894–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caro T (2009) Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:537–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caro T (2013) The colours of extant mammals. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24:542–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cloudsley-Thompson JL (1979) Adaptive functions of the colours of desert animals. J Arid Environ 2:95–104Google Scholar
  5. Dawson TJ (1972) Likely effects of standing and lying on the radiation heat load experienced by a resting kangaroo on a summer day. Aust J Zool 20:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson TJ (2012) Kangaroos. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson TJ, Brown GD (1970) A comparison of the insulative and reflective properties of the fur of desert kangaroos. Comp Biochem Physiol 37:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson TJ, Fanning FD (1981) Thermal and energetic problems of semiaquatic mammals: a study of the Australian water rat, including comparisons with the platypus. Physiol Zool 54:285–296Google Scholar
  9. Dawson TJ, Maloney SK (2004) Fur versus feathers: the different roles of red kangaroo fur and emu feathers in thermoregulation in the Australian arid zone. Aust Mammal 26:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson T, Maloney S (2008) The significance of fur characteristics in the thermal challenges posed by solar radiation: an underestimated role and source of adaptability? In: Morris S, Vosloo A (eds) Molecules to migration: The pressures of life. Proceedings of the 41h CPB Meeting in Africa: Mara 2008. Medimond International Proceedings, Bologna, pp 361–374Google Scholar
  11. Dawson T, Schmidt-Nielsen K (1966) Effect of thermal conductance on water economy in the Antelope Jack Rabbit, Lepus alleni. Cell Physiol 67:463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Degabriele R, Dawson TJ (1979) Metabolism and heat balance in an arboreal marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Comp Physiol 134:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond ME, Arabzadeh E (2013) Whisker sensory system—from receptor to decision. Prog Neurobiol 103:28–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon G, Brown AS, Pulsford T (1988) A koala (Phascolarctos cinereus Goldfuss) population crash during drought and heatwave conditions in south-western Queensland. Aust J Ecol 13:451–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grenfell TC, Warren SG, Mullen PC (1994) Reflection of solar radiation by Antarctic snow surface at ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared wavelength wavelengths. J Geophys Res 99:18669–18684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grojean RE, Sousa JA, Henry MC (1980) Utilization of solar radiation by polar animals: an optical model for pelts. Appl Optics 19:339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton WJI (1973) Life’s color code. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammel HT (1955) Thermal properties of fur. Am J Physiol 182:369–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hetem RS, de Witt BA, Fick LG, Fuller A, Kerley GIH, Meyer LCR, Mitchell D, Maloney SK (2009) Body temperature, thermoregulatory behaviour and pelt characteristics of three colour morphs of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis). Comp Biochem Physiol A 152:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchinson JCD, Brown GD (1969) Penetrance of cattle coats by radiation. J Appl Physiol 26:454–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchinson JCD, Brown GD, Allen TE (1976) The effect of solar radiation on the sensible heat exchange of mammals. In: Johnson HI (ed) Progress in biometeorology, division B. Swet and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam, pp 61–79 (pp 268–270)Google Scholar
  22. Kavanagh R, Barrott E (2001) Koala populations in the Pilliga forests. In: Dargavel J, Hart D, Libbis B (eds) Perfumed pineries: environmental history of Australia’s Callitris forests. CRES, Australian National University, Canberra, pp 93–103Google Scholar
  23. Koon DW (1998) Is polar bear hair fiber optic? Appl Optics 37:3198–3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lustick S (1971) Plumage color and energetics. Condor 73:121–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lustick S, Battersby B, Kelty M (1978) Behavioral thermoregulation: orientation towards the sun in Herring Gulls. Science 200:81–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maier H, Meixner M, Hartmann D, Sandhoff R, Wang-Eckhardt L, Zöller I, Gieselmann V, Eckhardt M (2011) Normal fur development and sebum production depends on fatty acid 2-hydroxylase expression in sebaceous glands. J Biol Chem 286:25922–25934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maloney SK, Dawson TJ (1995) The heat load from solar radiation on a large, diurnally active bird, the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). J Therm Biol 20:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin R, Handasyde K (1999) The Koala. University of New South Wales Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore KE, Blache D, Maloney SK (2011) Fibre diameter and insulation in alpacas: the biophysical implications. Small Rumin Res 96:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagy KA (1987) Field metabolic rate and food requirement scaling in mammals and birds. Ecol Monogr 57:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Øritsland NA (1970) Temperature regulation of the polar bear (Thalarctos maritimus). Comp Biochem Physiol 37:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt-Nielsen K, Dawson TJ, Hammel HT, Hinds D, Jackson DC (1965) The Jack rabbit—a study in its desert survival. Hvalradets Skrifter Nr 48:125–142Google Scholar
  33. Scholander PF, Hock R, Walters V, Irving L (1950a) Adaptation to cold in Arctic and tropical mammals and birds in relation to body temperature, insulation and basal metabolic rate. Biol Bull 99:259–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholander PF, Hock R, Walters V, Johnson F, Irving L (1950b) Heat regulation in some Arctic and tropical mammals and birds. Biol Bull 99:237–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scholander PF, Walters V, Hock R, Irving L (1950c) Body insulation of some Arctic and tropical mammals. Biol Bull 99:225–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:423–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stone C, Chisholm L, Coops N (2001) Spectral reflectance characteristics of eucalypt foliage damaged by insects. Aust J Bot 49:687–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stuart-Fox D, Moussalli A (2009) Camouflage, communication and thermoregulation: lessons from colour changing organisms. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:463–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tributsch H, Goslowsky H, Kuppers U, Wetzel H (1990) Light collection and solar sensing through the polar bear pelt. Solar Energy Mater 21:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Troscianko T, Benton CP, Lovell PG, Tolhurst DJ, Zygmunt P (2009) Camouflage and visual perception. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:449–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsberg GE (1988) The significance of fur structure for solar heat gain in the rock squirrel, Spermophilus variegatus. J Exp Biol 138:243–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Walsberg GE, Schmidt CA (1989) Seasonal adjustment of solar heat gain in a desert mammal by altering coat properties independent of surface coloration. J Exp Biol 142:387–400Google Scholar
  43. Walsberg GE, Campbell GS, King JR (1978) Animal coat color and radiative heat gain: a re-evaluation. J Comp Physiol B 126:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolf BO, Walsberg GE (2000) The role of plumage in heat transfer processes of birds. Am Zool 40:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wunder BA (1979) Evaporative water loss from birds: effects of artificial radiation. Comp Biochem Physiol 63A:493–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence J. Dawson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Koa N. Webster
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shane K. Maloney
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  3. 3.School of Anatomy, Physiology, and Human BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations