Differences in osmotolerance in freshwater and brackish water populations of Theodoxus fluviatilis (Gastropoda: Neritidae) are associated with differential protein expression
- 109 Downloads
The euryhaline gastropod Theodoxus fluviatilis is found in northern Germany in freshwater or in brackish water habitats in the Baltic Sea. Previous studies have revealed that individuals from both habitats are not distinguishable by morphological characters or by sequence comparison of DNA encoding 16S RNA or cytochrome C. As reported in this study, animals collected in the two habitats differ substantially in their physiological ability to adapt to different salinities. Comparison of accumulation rates of ninhydrin-positive substances (NPS) in foot muscle upon transfer of animals to higher medium salinities revealed that brackish water animals were perfectly able to mobilize NPS, while freshwater animals had only limited ability to do so. In an attempt to explore whether this difference in physiology may be caused by genetic differentiation, we compared protein expression patterns of soluble foot muscle proteins using 2D gel electrophoresis and silver staining. Of the 40 consistently detected protein spots, 27 showed similar levels in protein expression in animals collected from freshwater or brackish water habitats, respectively. In 12 spots, however, protein concentration was higher in brackish water than in freshwater animals. In four of these spots, expression levels followed increases or decreases in medium salinities. In a different set of 4 of these 12 spots, protein levels were always higher in brackish water as compared to freshwater animals, regardless of their physiological situation (14 days in artificial pond water or in medium with a salinity of 16‰). The remaining 4 of the 12 spots had complex expression patterns. Protein levels of the remaining single spot were generally higher in freshwater animals than in brackish water animals. These expression patterns may indicate that freshwater and brackish water animals of T. fluviatilis belong to different locally adapted populations with subtle genetic differentiation.
KeywordsSalinity adaptation Physiological adaptation Osmoregulation Euryhalinity Foot muscle Protein expression Theodoxus fluviatilis Neritidae
The authors thank Christina Pommerenke for excellent experimental help in some of the experiments and Klaus Fischer (Zoology, University of Greifswald) and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. Permissions for the collection of animals were granted by Landesumweltamt Brandenburg, Potsdam, Germany (N24440-236-NF/1167-2002) and by Nationalparkamt Vorpommersche Boddenlandschaft, Born, Germany (24-5303.3).
- Butenko O (2001) Mollusks of Theodoxus genus (Gastropoda, Neritidae) in the Odessa Bay (The Black Sea). Ecol Morya 58:27–28Google Scholar
- Gilles R, Jeuniaux C (1979) Osmoregulation and ecology in media of fluctuating salinity. In: Gilles R (ed) Mechanisms of osmoregulation in animals. Wiley, Chichester, pp 581–608Google Scholar
- Jaeckel SGA (1950) Die Mollusken der Schlei. Arch Hydrobiol 44:214–270Google Scholar
- Neumann D (1960) Osmotische Resistenz und Osmoregulation der Flußdeckelschnecke Theodoxus fluviatilis L. Biol Zentralbl 5:585–605Google Scholar
- Vinu Chandran R, Damodaran R (2000) Oxygen consumption, ammonia excretion and total ninhydrin positive substances in black clam Villorita cyprinoides (Pelecypoda) exposed to various salinities. Indian J Mar Sci 19:80–82Google Scholar
- Zettler ML, Frankowski J, Bochert R, Röhner M (2004) Morphological and ecological features of Theodoxus fluviatilis (LINNAEUS, 1758) from Baltic brackish water and German freshwater populations. J Conchol 38:305–316Google Scholar