Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 204, Issue 5, pp 465–473 | Cite as

Tyraminergic modulation of agonistic outcomes in crayfish

  • Yuto Momohara
  • Hitoshi Aonuma
  • Toshiki Nagayama
Original Paper

Abstract

Octopamine, a biogenic amine, modulates various behaviors, ranging from locomotion and aggression to learning and memory in invertebrates. Several studies recently demonstrated that tyramine, the biological precursor of octopamine, also affects behaviors independent of octopamine. Here we investigated the involvement of tyramine in agonistic interaction of the male crayfish Procambarus clarkii. When male crayfish fight, larger animals (3–7% difference in body length) are more likely to win. By contrast, direct injection of tyramine or octopamine counteracted the physical advantage of larger animals. Tyramine or octopamine-injected naive large animals were mostly beaten by untreated smaller naive animals. This pharmacological effect was similar to the loser effect in which subordinate larger animals are frequently beaten by smaller animals. Furthermore, loser effects were partly eliminated by either injection of epinastine, an octopamine blocker, or yohimbine, a tyramine blocker, and significantly diminished by injection of a mixture of both blockers. We also observed that tyramine levels in the subesophageal ganglion were remarkably increased in subordinate crayfish after losing a fight. These results suggest that tyramine modulates aggressive levels of crayfish and contributes to the loser effect in parallel with octopamine.

Keywords

Tyramine Octopamine Agonistic interaction Loser effect Aggression 

Abbreviations

epina

Epinastine

NL

Naive large animal

NS

Naive small animal

OA

Octopamine

SL

Subordinate large animal

TA

Tyramine

yohim

Yohimbine

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Kawamura. K for reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport, and Culture to TN (16K07432). All experiments were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals of Yamagata University (Japan).

References

  1. Alkema MJ, Hunter-Ensor M, Ringstad N, Horvitz R (2005) Tyramine function independently of octopamine in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Neuron 46:247–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonsen BL, Paul DH (1997) Serotonin and octopamine elicit stereotypical agonistic behaviors in the squat lobster Munida quadrispina (Anomura, Galatheidae). J Comp Physiol A 181:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aonuma H, Watanabe T (2012) Changes in the content of brain biogenic amine associated with early colony establishment in the queen of the ant, Formica japonica. PLoS One 7:e43377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Balfanz S, Strunker T, Frings S, Baumann A (2005) A family of octopamine receptors that specifically induce cyclic AMP production or Ca2+ release in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurochem 93:440–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayliss A, Roselli G, Evans PD (2013) A comparison of signaling properties of two tyramine receptors from Drosophila. J Neurochem 125:37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  7. Bloch G, Simon T, Robinson GE, Hefetz A (2000) Brain biogenic amines and reproductive dominance in bumble bee (Bombus terrestris). J Comp Physiol A 186:261–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Braun G, Bicker G (1992) Habituation of an appetitive reflex in the honeybee. J Neurophysiol 67:588–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brodfuehrer PD, Friesen WO (1986) Initiation of swimming activity by trigger neurons in the leech suboesophageal ganglion I. Output connections of Tr1 and Tr2. J Comp Physiol A 159:489–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang ES, Chang SA, Beltz BS, Kravitz EA (1999) Crustacean hyperglycemic hormone in the lobster nervous system: localization and release from cells in the subesophageal ganglion and thoracic second roots. J Comp Neurol 414:50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chase I, Bartolomeo C, Dugatkin LA (1994) Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning? Anim Behav 48:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornford A, Kristan WB III, Malnove S, Kristan WB Jr, French KA (2006) Functions of the subesophageal ganglion in the medicinal leech revealed by ablation of neuromeres in embryos. J Exp Biol 209:493–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuvillier-Hot V, Lenoir A (2006) Biogenic amine levels, reproduction and social dominance in the queenless-ant Streblognathus peetersi. Naturwissenschaften 93:149–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daws AG, Grills J, Konzen K, Moore PA (2002) Previous experiences alter the outcome of aggressive interactions between males in the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 35:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drummond H, Canales C (1998) Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects. Anim Bahav 55:1669–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falibene A, Rossler W, Josens R (2012) Serotonin depresses feeding behaviour in ants. J Insect Physiol 58:7–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fussnecker BL, Smith BH, Mustard JA (2006) Octopamine and tyramine influence the behavioral profile of locomotor activity in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol 52:1083–1092CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuxjager MJ, Mast G, Becker EA, Marler CA (2009) The ‘home advantage’ is necessary for a full winner effect and changes in post-encounter testosterone. Horm Behav 56:214–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuxjager MJ, Forbes-Lorman RM, Coss DJ, Auger CJ, Auger AP, Marler CA (2010) Winning territorial disputes selectively enhances androgen sensitivity in neural pathways related to motivation and social aggression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12393–12398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Goessmann C, Hemelrijk C, Huber R (2000) The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goubault M, Decuigniere M (2012) previous experience and contest outcome: winner effects persist in absence of evident loser effects in a parasitoid wasp. Am Nat 180:364–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu Y, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57:903–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Huber R, Delago A (1998) Serotonin alters decisions to withdraw in fighting crayfish. Astacus astacus: the motivational concept revisited. J Comp Physiol A 182:573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huber R, Smith K, Delago A, Isaksson K, Kravitz EA (1997) Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: altering the decision to retreat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5939–5942CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaczer L, Pedetta S, Maldonado H (2007) Aggressiveness and memory: subordinate crabs present higher memory ability than dominants after an agonistic experience. Neurobiol Learn Mem 87:140–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Sivalinghem S, Mason AC, Andrade MCB (2010) Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol 21:404–409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Khazraie K, Campan M (1999) The role of prior agonistic experience in dominance relationships in male crickets Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav Process 44:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klappenbach M, Maldonado H, Locatelli F, Kaczer L (2012) Opposite actions of dopamine on aversive and appetitive memories in the crab. Learn Mem 19:73–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kononenko NL, Wolfenberg H, Pfluger HJ (2009) Tyramine as an independent transmitter and a precursor of octopamine in the locust central nervous system: an immunocytochemical study. J Comp Neurol 512:433–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kravitz EA (1988) Hormonal control of behavior: amines and biasing of behavioral output in lobsters. Science 241:1775–1781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kravitz EA, Evans PD, Talamo BR, Wallace BG, Battelle BA (1976) Octopamine neurons in lobster: location, morphology, release of octopamine and possible physiological role. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 40:127–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kutsukake M, Komatsu A, Yamamoto D, Ishiwa CS (2000) A tyramine receptor gene mutation causes a defective olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Gene 245:31–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lan YT, Hsu Y (2011) Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects. Front Zool 8:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Livingstone MS, Harris-Warrick RM, Kravitz EA (1980) Serotonin and octopamine produce opposite postures in lobsters. Science 208:76–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maeda T, Tamotsu S, Iwasaki M, Nisimura T, Shimohigashi M, Hojo MK, Ozaki M (2014) Neuronal projections and putative interaction of multimodal inputs in the subesophageal ganglion in the blowfly, Phormia regina. Chem Senses 39:391–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maqueira B, Chatwin H, Evans PD (2005) Identification and characterization of a novel family of Drosophila b-adrenergic-like octopamine G-protein coupled receptors. J Neurochem 94:547–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Momohara Y, Kanai A, Nagayama T (2013) Aminergic control of social status in crayfish agonistic encounters. PLoS One 8:e74489CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Momohara Y, Yoshida M, Nagayama T (2015) Serotonergic modulation of social status-dependent behavioural plasticity of the crayfish avoidance reaction. J Comp Physiol A 201:1063–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Momohara Y, Minami H, Kanai A, Nagayama T (2016) Role of cAMP signalling in winner and loser effects in crayfish agonistic encounters. Eur J Neurosci 44:1886–1895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliveira RF, Silva A, Canario AVM (2009) Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:2249–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pedetta S, Kaczer L, Maldonado H (2010) Individual aggressiveness in the crab Chasmagnathus: influence in fight outcome and modulation by serotonin and octopamine. Physiol Behav 101:438–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pflüger HJ, Duch C (2011) Dynamic neural control of insect muscle metabolism related to motor behavior. Physiology 26:293–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Piri M, Rostampour M, Nasehi M, Zarrindast MR (2013) Blockade of the dorsal hippocampal dopamine D1 receptors inhibits the scopolamine induced state-dependent learning in rats. Neuroscience 252:460–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Reyes-Colon D, Vazquez-Acevedo N, Rivera NM, Jezzini SH, Rosenthal J, Ruiz-Rodriguez EA, Baro DJ, Kohn AB, Moroz L, Sosa MA (2010) Cloning and distribution of a putative octopamine/tyramine receptor in the central nervous system of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Brain Res 1348:42–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Rillich J, Stevenson PA (2015) Releasing stimuli and aggression in crickets: octopamine promotes escalation and maintenance but not initiation. Front Behav Neurosci 9:95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rillich J, Schlidberger K, Stevenson PA (2011) Octopamine and occupancy: an aminergic mechanism for intruder-resident aggression in crickets. Proc Biol Sci 278:1873–1880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Roeder T (1999) Octopamine in invertebrates. Prog Neurobiol 59:533–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roeder T (2005) Tyramine and octopamine: ruling behavior and metabolism. Annu Rev Entomol 50:447–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rotte C, Krach C, Balfanz S, Baymann A, Walz B, Blenau W (2009) Molecular characterization and localization of the first tyramine receptor of the american cockroach (Periplaneta americana). Neurosci 162:1120–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saraswati S, Fox LE, Soil DR, Wu CF (2004) Tyramine and octopamine have opposite effects on the locomotion of Drosophila leave. J Neurosci 58:425–441Google Scholar
  51. Sato D, Nagayama T (2012) Development of agonistic encounters in dominance hierarchy formation of juvenile crayfish. J Exp Biol 215:1210–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheiner R, Pluckhahn S, Oney B, Blenau W, Erber J (2002) Behavioural pharmacology of octopamine, tyramine and dopamine in honey bees. Behav Brain Res 136:545–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneider H, Trimmer BA, Rapus J, Eckert M, Valentine DE, Kravitz EA (1993) Mapping of octopamine-immunoreactive neurons in the central nervous system of the lobster. J Comp Neurol 329:129–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider H, Budhiraja P, Walter I, Beltz BS, Peckol E, Kravitz EA (1996) Developmental expression of the octopamine phenotype in lobsters, Homarus americanus. J Comp Neurol 371:3–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Selcho M, Pauls D, El Jundi B, Stocker RF, Thum A. S (2012) The role of octopamine and tyramine in Drosophila larval locomotion. J Comp Neurol 520:3764–3378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Shiratori C, Suzuki N, Momohara Y, Shiraishi K, Aonuma H, Nagayama T (2017) Cyclic AMP-regulated opposing and parallel effects of serotonin and dopamine on phototaxis in the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish). Eur J Neurosci 46:1863–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sneddon LU, Taylor AC, Huntingford FA, Watson DG (2000) Agonistic behaviour and biogenic amines in shore crabs Carcinus maenas. J Exp Biol 203:537–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Summers CH, Greenberg N (1995) Activation of central biogenic amines following aggressive interaction in male lizards, Anolis carolinensis. Brain Behav Evol 45:339–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tran DH, Meissner GW, French RL, Baker BS (2014) A small subset of Fruitless subesophageal neurons modulate early courtship in Drosophila. PLoS One 9:e95472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Trannoy S, Penn J, Lucey K, Popovic D, Kravitz EA (2016) Short and long-lasting behavioral consequence of agonistic encounters between male Drosophila melanogaster. Porc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4818–4823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ueno R, Nagayama T (2012) Interlocking of chelae is a key factor for dominance hierarchy formation in crayfish. J Exp Biol 215:2841–2848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Watanabe S, Momohara Y, Minami H, Nagayama T (2016) Two types of orienting behaviour during agonistic encounters in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Decapoda: Cambaridae). J Crust Biol 36:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winberg S, Nilsson GE, Olsen KH (1992) Changes in brain serotonergic activity during hierarchic behavior in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.) are socially induced. J Comp Physiol A 170:93–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wine JJ, Krasne FB (1972) The organization of escape behaviour in the crayfish. J Exp Biol 56:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Yurkovic A, Wang O, Basu AC, Kravitz EA (2006) Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17519–17524CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Zulandt T, Zulandt-Schneider RA, Moore PA (2008) observing agonistic interactions alters subsequent fighting dynamics in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 75:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuto Momohara
    • 1
    • 4
  • Hitoshi Aonuma
    • 2
  • Toshiki Nagayama
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Biology, Graduate School of Science and EngineeringYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
  2. 2.Research Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceYamagata UniversityYamagataJapan
  4. 4.Information Processing Biology UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations