Advertisement

Lagenar potentials of the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus

  • Brooke J. VetterEmail author
  • Lane H. Seeley
  • Joseph A. Sisneros
Original Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus) is a species of marine teleost that produces acoustic signals that are important for mediating social behavior. The auditory sensitivity of the saccule is well established in this species, but the sensitivity and function of the midshipman’s putative auditory lagena are unknown. Here, we characterize the auditory-evoked potentials from hair cells in the lagena of reproductive type I males to determine the frequency response and auditory sensitivity of the lagena to behaviorally relevant acoustic stimuli. Lagenar potentials were recorded from the caudal and medial region of the lagena, while acoustic stimuli were presented by an underwater speaker. Our results indicate that the midshipman lagena has a similar low-frequency sensitivity to that of the midshipman saccule based on sound pressure and acceleration (re: 1 µPa and 1 ms−2, respectively), but the thresholds of the lagena were higher across all frequencies tested. The relatively high auditory thresholds of the lagena may be important for encoding high levels of behaviorally relevant acoustic stimuli when close to  a sound source.

Keywords

Auditory-evoked potentials Lagena Hair cell tuning Hearing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nick Lozier, Rob Mohr, Ruiyu Zeng, and William Palmer for assistance with fish collection and husbandry. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Auditory Neuroscience Training Grant, T32: 4T32DC005361-15 to BJV) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) (IOS-1456700 to JAS). All experimental procedures followed NIH guidelines for the care and use of animals and were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Care and Use Committee.

References

  1. Alderks PW, Sisneros JA (2011) Ontogeny of auditory saccular sensitivity in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Comp Physiol A 197(4):387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass AH, Clark CW (2003) The physical acoustics of underwater sound communication. In: Simmons AM, Fay RR, Popper A (eds) Spring handbook of auditory research. Springer, New York, pp 15–64Google Scholar
  3. Bass AH, Ladich F (2008) Vocal–acoustic communication: from neurons to behavior. In: Webb JF, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Fish bioacoustics. Springer, New York, pp 253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass AH, McKibben JR (2003) Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. Progr Neurobiol 69(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass AH, Bodnar DA, Marchaterre MA (1999) Complementary explanations for existing phenotypes in an acoustic communication system. In: Hauser MD, Konishi M (eds) The design of animal communication. MIT, Cambridge, pp 493–514Google Scholar
  6. Bhandiwad AA, Whitechurch EA, Colleye O, Zeddies DG, Sisneros JA (2017) Seasonal plasticity of auditory saccular sensitivity in “sneaker” type II male plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Comp Physiol A 203:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bose APH, Cogliati KM, Luymes N, Bass AH, Marchaterre MA, Sisneros JA, Bolker BM, Balshine S (2018) Phenotypic traits and resource quality as factors affecting male reproductive success in a toadfish. Behav Ecol 29(2):496–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyle KS, Herrel A (2018) Relative size variation of the otoliths, swim bladder, and Weberian apparatus structures in piranhas and pacus (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) with different ecologies and its implications for the detection of sound stimuli. J Morph.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20908 Google Scholar
  9. Bradley D, Wilson W (1966) Acoustic impedance of sea water as a function of temperature, pressure and salinity. Physics Research Department, US Naval Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  10. Brantley RK, Bass AH (1994) Alternative male spawning tactics and acoustic signals in the plainfin midshipman fish Porichthys notatus Girard (Teleostei, Batrachoididae). Ethology 96(3):213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casper BM, Mann DA (2006) Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the yellow stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis). Environ Biol Fish 76:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen MJ, Winn HF (1967) Electrophysiological observations on hearing and sound production in the fish Porichthys notatus. J Exp Zool 165:355–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Vries HL (1950) The mechanics of the labyrinth otoliths. Acta Otolaryngol 38(3):262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egner SA, Mann DA (2005) Auditory sensitivity of sergeant major damselfish Abudefduf saxatilis from post-settlement juvenile to adult. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 285:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erbe C (2011) Underwater acoustics: noise and the effects on marine mammals, 3rd edn. JASCO Applied Sciences, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  16. Fay RR (1974) Sound Reception and processing in the carp: saccular potentials. Comp Biochem Physiol 49A:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fay RR (1984) The goldfish ear codes the axis of acoustic particle motion in three dimensions. Science 225(4665):951–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fine ML, Lenhardt ML (1983) Shallow-water propagation of the toadfish mating call. J Comp Physiol A 76:225–231Google Scholar
  19. Fine ML, Parmentier E (2015) Mechanisms of fish sound production. In: Ladich F (ed) Sound communication in fishes. Animal signals and communication, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–126Google Scholar
  20. Forlano PM, Sisneros JA, Rohmann K, Bass AH (2015) Neuroendocrine control of seasonal plasticity in the auditory and vocal systems of fish. Front Neuroendocrinol 37:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forlano PM, Maruska KM, Sisneros JA, Bass AH (2016) Hormone-dependent plasticity of auditory systems in fishes. In: Bass AH, Sisneros JA, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Hearing and hormones. Springer handbook of auditory research, vol 57. Springer, New York, pp 15–51Google Scholar
  22. Furukawa T, Ishii Y (1967) Neurophysiological studies on hearing in goldfish. J Neurophysiol 30:1377–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hama K (1969) A study on the fine structure of the saccular macula of the goldfish. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 94:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris GG, van Bergeijk WA (1962) Evidence that the lateral-line organ responds to near-field displacements of sound sources in water. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1831–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hawkins AD (1993) Underwater sound and fish behavior. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 114–151Google Scholar
  26. Higgs DM, Souza MJ, Wilkins HR, Presson JC, Popper AN (2001) Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). JARO 03:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jielof R, Spoor A, deVries HI (1952) The microphonic activity of the lateral line. J Physiol 116:137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelley DB, Bass AH (2010) Neurobiology of vocal communication: mechanisms for sensorimotor integration and vocal patterning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(6):748–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ladich F (2004) Sound production and acoustic communication. In: von der Emde G, Mogdans J, Kapoor BG (eds) The senses of fishes: adaptations for the reception of natural stimuli. Narosa Publishing House Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp 210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Z, Xu Z (2002) Effects of saccular otolith removal on hearing sensitivity of the sleeper goby (Dormitator latifrons). J Comp Physiol A 188:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu Z, Song J, Popper A (1998) Encoding of acoustic directional information by saccular afferents of the sleeper goby, Dormitator latifrons. J Comp Physiol A 182:805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu Z, Xu Z, Buchser WJ (2003) Acoustic response properties of lagenar nerve fibers in the sleeper goby, Dormitator latifrons. J Comp Physiol A 189:889–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu Z, Xu Z, Buchser WJ (2004) Coding of acoustic particle motion by utricular fibers in the sleeper goby, Dormitator latifrons. J Comp Physiol A 190:923–938Google Scholar
  34. Mann DA, Higgs DM, Tavolga WN, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2001) Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 109:3048–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maruska KP, Mensinger AF (2015) Directional sound sensitivity in utricular afferents in the toadfish Opsanus tau. J Exp Biol 218:1759–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maruska KP, Sisneros JA (2015) Sex steroid-dependent modulation of acoustic communication systems in fishes. In: Ladich F (ed) Sound communication in fishes, vol 4. Spring, Berlin, pp 207–233Google Scholar
  37. Maruska KP, Boyle KS, Dewan LR, Tricas TC (2007) Sound production and spectral hearing sensitivity in the Hawaiian seargent damselfish, Abudefduf abdominalis. J Exp Biol 210:3990–4004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer M, Popper AN, Fay RR (2004) Frequency tuning and directional preferences in lagenar nerve fibers of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Abst Assn Res Otolaryngol 27:325Google Scholar
  39. Meyer M, Fay RR, Popper AN (2010) Frequency tuning and intensity coding of sound in the auditory periphery of the lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens. J Exp Biol 213:1567–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohr RA, Whitchurch EA, Anderson RD, Forlano PM, Fay RR, Ketten ER, Cox TC, Sisneros JA (2017) Intra- and intersexual swim bladder dimorphisms in the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): Implications of swim bladder proximity to the inner ear for sound pressure detection. J Morphol 278(11):1458–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nedelec SL, Campbell J, Radford AN, Simpson SD, Merchant ND (2016) Particle motion: the missing link in underwater acoustic ecology. Methods Ecol Evol 7:836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Platt C, Popper AN (1981) Structure and function in the ear. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, New York, pp 3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popper AN, Fay RR (1993) Sound detection and processing by fish: critical review and major research questions. Brain Behav Evol 41:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Popper AN, Fay RR (2011) Rethinking sound detection by fishes. Hear Res 273(1):25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers PH, Cox M (1988) Underwater sound as a biological stimulus. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer, New York, pp 131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rohmann KN, Bass AH (2011) Seasonal plasticity of auditory hair cell frequency sensitivity correlates with plasma steroid levels in vocal fish. J Exp Biol 214(11):1931–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sand O (1973) Directional sensitivity of microphonic potentials from the perch ear. J Exp Biol 60:881–899Google Scholar
  48. Schulz-Mirbach T, Ladich F, Plath M, Heß M (2018) Enigmatic ear stones: what we know about the functional role and evolution of fish otoliths. Biol Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12463 Google Scholar
  49. Sisneros JA (2007) Saccular potentials of the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Comp Physiol A 193:413–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sisneros JA (2009a) Adaptive hearing in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish: getting in tune for the breeding season and implications for acoustic communication. Integr Zool 4:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sisneros JA (2009b) Seasonal plasticity of auditory saccular sensitivity in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. J Neurophysiol 102(2):1121–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sisneros JA, Bass AH (2003) Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity. J Neurosci 23:1049–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sisneros JA, Rogers PH (2016) Directional hearing and sound source localization in fishes. In: Sisneros JA (ed) Fish hearing and bioacoustics. Springer, New York, pp 121–155Google Scholar
  54. Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (2002) Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Anim Behav 63(5):1009–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vasconcelos RO, Sisneros JA, Amorim MCP, Fonseca PJ (2011) Auditory saccular sensitivity of the vocal Lusitanian toadfish: low frequency tuning allows acoustic communication throughout the year. J Comp Physiol A 197(9):903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vetter BJ, Brey MK, Mensinger AF (2018) Reexamining the frequency range of hearing in silver (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead (H. nobilis) carp. PLoS One 13(3):e0192561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wysocki LE, Codarin A, Ladich F, Picciulin M (2009) Sound pressure and particle acceleration audiograms in three marine fish species from the Adriatic Sea. J Acoust Soc Am 126(4):2100–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zotterman Y (1943) The microphonic effect of teleost labyrinths and its biological significance. J Physiol 102:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsSeattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research CenterUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations