Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 200, Issue 5, pp 385–398 | Cite as

Ground reaction forces in vertically ascending beetles and corresponding activity of the claw retractor muscle on smooth and rough substrates

  • Philipp BußhardtEmail author
  • Stanislav N. Gorb
Original Paper

Abstract

We measured ground reaction forces in fore–aft and normal directions of single hind and front legs in vertically ascending Sagra femorata beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) on a smooth and a rough substrate. Simultaneously, we performed electromyographic recordings (EMGs) of the hind leg claw retractor muscle that partly controls the attachment structures. On both substrates, hind legs produced upward- as well as downward-directed forces during one stance phase. Forces were equivalent in both directions. Front legs generated only upward-directed forces. The main function of hind legs in ascending beetles in the second half of the stance thus probably prevented the animals from tilting away from the substrate. The EMGs of hind legs showed an early spike during stance with large amplitude. It was mostly followed by few additional spikes with large amplitude and in some cases of spikes with smaller amplitude distributed throughout the stance phase. We found significantly more spikes on the rough substrate than on the smooth one. This is probably due to the more important role of pretarsal claws than tarsal hairy attachment pads on the rough substrate or to the reduced adhesive forces on the rough substrate that have to be compensated by additional muscle activity.

Keywords

Locomotion Insects Attachment Adhesion Retractor unguis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany (Project BMBF Biona 01RB0802A) to S.N.G.

References

  1. Arnold JW (1974) Adaptive features on the tarsi of cockroaches (Insecta: Dictyoptera). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 3:317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R (2003) From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:10603–10606PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autumn K, Peattie AM (2002) Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integr Comp Biol 42:1081–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autumn K, Hsieh ST, Dudek DM, Chen J, Chitaphan C, Full RJ (2006) Dynamics of geckos running vertically. J Exp Biol 209:260–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauchhenß E (1979) Die Pulvillen von Calliphora erythrocephala (Diptera, Brachycera) als Adhäsionsorgane. Zoomorphologie 93:99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beutel RG, Gorb SN (2001) Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. J Zool Syst Evol Res 39:177–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunn DE, Dean J (1994) Intersegmental and local interneurons in the metathorax of the stick insect Carausius morosus that monitor middle leg position. J Neurophysiol 72:1208–1219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock JMR, Federle W (2009) Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance. J Exp Biol 212:1876–1888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullock JMR, Federle W (2011) The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula. Insect Sci 18:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock JMR, Drechseler P, Federle W (2008) Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence. J Exp Biol 211:3333–3343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bußhardt P, Gorb SN (2013) Walking on smooth and rough ground: activity and timing of the claw retractor muscle in the beetle Pachnoda marginata peregrina (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol 216:319–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bußhardt P, Gorb SN, Wolf H (2011) Activity of the claw retractor muscle in stick insects in wall and ceiling situations. J Exp Biol 214:1676–1684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bußhardt P, Wolf H, Gorb SN (2012) Adhesive and frictional properties of tarsal attachment pads in stick insects (Phasmatodea) with smooth and nubby euplantulae. Zoology 115:135–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman RF (1998) Legs and locomotion. In: Simpson SJ, Douglas AE (eds) The insects: structure and function, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, pp 151–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chung JY, Chaudhury MK (2005) Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads. J R Soc Interface 2:55–61PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clemente CJ, Federle W (2008) Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1329–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Creton C, Gorb SN (2007) Sticky feet: from animals to materials. MRS Bull 32:466–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cruse H (1976) The function of the legs in the free walking stick insect, Carausius morosus. J Comp Physiol A 112:235–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruse H (1990) What mechanisms coordinate leg movement in walking arthropods? Trends Neurosci 13:15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dai Z, Gorb SN, Schwarz U (2002) Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Exp Biol 205:2479–2488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dean J, Wendler G (1983) Stick insect locomotion on a walking wheel: interleg coordination of leg position. J Exp Biol 103:75–94Google Scholar
  22. Drechsler P, Federle W (2006) Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal attachment on performance. J Comp Physiol A 192:1213–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duch C, Pflüger HJ (1995) Motor patterns for horizontal and upside down walking and vertical climbing in the locust. J Exp Biol 198:1963–1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dürr V, Schmitz J, Cruse H (2004) Behaviour-based modelling of hexapod locomotion: linking biology and technical application. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:237–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Federle W (2006) Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J Exp Biol 209:2611–2621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Hölldobler B (2001) Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:6215–6220PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Filippov A, Popov VL, Gorb SN (2011) Shear induced adhesion: contact mechanics of biological spatula-like attachment devices. J Theor Biol 276:126–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frantsevich L, Gorb S (2004) Structure and mechanics of the tarsal chain in the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): implications on the attachment mechanism. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:77–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui C-Y, Kim J (2004) Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact. J R Soc Interface 1:23–33PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godden DH (1972) The motor innervation of the leg musculature and motor output during thanatosis in the stick insect Carausius morosus Br. J Comp Physiol A 80:201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goel SC (1972) Notes on structure of unguitractor plate in Heteroptera (Hemiptera). J Entomol 46:167–173Google Scholar
  32. Goldman DI, Chen TS, Dudek DM, Full RJ (2006) Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template. J Exp Biol 209:2990–3000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gorb SN (1996) Design of insect unguitractor apparatus. J Morphol 230:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorb SN (1998) The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenant setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:747–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gorb SN (2001) Attachment devices of insect cuticle. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  36. Gorb SN (2011) Biological fibrillar adhesives: functional principles and biomimetic applications. In: Da Silva LFM, Öchsner A, Adams RD (eds) Handbook of adhesion technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1409–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Homann H (1957) Haften Spinnen an einer Wasserhaut? Naturwissenschaften 44:318–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hui C-Y, Glassmaker NJ, Tang T, Jagota A (2004) Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion. J R Soc Interface 1:35–48PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jagota A, Bennison SJ (2002) Mechanics of adhesion through a fibrillar microstructure. Integr Comp Biol 42:1140–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kendall MD (1970) The anatomy of the tarsi of Schistocerca gregaria Forskal. Cell Tissue Res 109:112–137Google Scholar
  41. Langer MG, Ruppersberg JP, Gorb S (2004) Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly’s seta. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2209–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larsen GS, Frazier SF, Fish SE, Zill SN (1995) Effects of load inversion in cockroach walking. J Comp Physiol A 176:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laurent G, Hustert R (1988) Motor neuronal receptive fields delimit patterns of motor activity during locomotion of the locust. J Neurosci 8:4349–4366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Niederegger S, Gorb SN (2003) Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. J Insect Physiol 49:611–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peisker H, Michels J, Gorb SN (2013) Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata. Nat commun 4:1661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perez Goodwyn P, Peressadko A, Schwarz H, Kastner V, Gorb S (2006) Material structure, stiffness, and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta: Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol A 192:1233–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Persson BNJ (2003) On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems. J Chem Phys 118:7614–7621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Persson BNJ, Gorb SN (2003) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J Chem Phys 119:11437–11444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prüm B, Seidl R, Bohn HF, Speck T (2012a) Impact of cell shape in hierarchically structured plant surfaces on the attachment of male Colorado potato beetles (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Beilstein J Nanotechnol 3:57–64PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prüm B, Seidl R, Bohn HF, Speck T (2012b) Plant surfaces with cuticular folds are slippery for beetles. J R Soc Interface 9:127–135PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Radnikow G, Bässler U (1991) Function of a muscle whose apodeme travels through a joint moved by other muscles: why the retractor unguis muscle in stick insects is tripartite and has no antagonist. J Exp Biol 157:87–99Google Scholar
  52. Rosenbaum P, Wosnitza A, Büschges A, Gruhn M (2010) Activity patterns and timing of muscle activity in the forward walking and backward walking stick insect Carausius morosus. J Neurophysiol 104:1681–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roth LM, Willis ER (1952) Tarsal structure and climbing ability of cockroaches. J Exp Zool 119:483–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell AP (2002) Integrative functional morphology of the gekkotan adhesive system (Reptilia: Gekkota). Integr Comp Biol 42:1154–1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seifert P, Heinzeller T (1989) Mechanical, sensory and glandular structures in the tarsal unguitractor apparatus of Chironomus riparius (Diptera, Chironomidae). Zoomorphology 109:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Comstock Publishing Associates, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Stein W, Büschges A, Bässler U (2006) Intersegmental transfer of sensory signals in the stick insect leg muscle control system. J Neurobiol 66:1253–1269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stork NE (1980) Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J Exp Biol 88:91–107Google Scholar
  59. Varenberg M, Pugno NM, Gorb SN (2010) Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion. Soft Matter 6:3269–3272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Voigt D, Schuppert JM, Dattinger S, Gorb SN (2008) Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. J Insect Physiol 54:765–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Voigt D, Schweikart A, Fery A, Gorb SN (2012) Leaf beetle attachment on wrinkles: isotropic friction on anisotropic surfaces. J Exp Biol 215:1975–1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watson JT, Ritzmann RE, Pollack AJ (2002) Control of climbing behavior in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis. II. Motor activities associated with joint movement. J Comp Physiol A 188:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolff JO, Gorb SN (2012) Comparative morphology of pretarsal scopulae in eleven spider families. Arthropod Struct Dev 41:419–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolff JO, Gorb SN (2013) Radial arrangement of Janus-like setae permits friction control on spiders. Sci Rep 3:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zill SN, Keller BR, Duke ER (2009) Sensory signals of unloading in one leg following stance onset in another leg: transfer of load and emergent coordination in cockroach walking. J Neurophysiol 101:2297–2304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zill SN, Keller BR, Chaudhry S, Duke ER, Neff D, Quinn R, Flannigan C (2010) Detecting substrate engagement: responses of tarsal campaniform sensilla in cockroaches. J Comp Physiol A 196:407–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological InstituteKiel UniversityKielGermany

Personalised recommendations