Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 199, Issue 1, pp 45–55 | Cite as

Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings

  • Wen Wu
  • Antonio M. Moreno
  • Jason M. Tangen
  • Judith ReinhardEmail author
Original Paper


Honeybees (Apis mellifera) have remarkable visual learning and discrimination abilities that extend beyond learning simple colours, shapes or patterns. They can discriminate landscape scenes, types of flowers, and even human faces. This suggests that in spite of their small brain, honeybees have a highly developed capacity for processing complex visual information, comparable in many respects to vertebrates. Here, we investigated whether this capacity extends to complex images that humans distinguish on the basis of artistic style: Impressionist paintings by Monet and Cubist paintings by Picasso. We show that honeybees learned to simultaneously discriminate between five different Monet and Picasso paintings, and that they do not rely on luminance, colour, or spatial frequency information for discrimination. When presented with novel paintings of the same style, the bees even demonstrated some ability to generalize. This suggests that honeybees are able to discriminate Monet paintings from Picasso ones by extracting and learning the characteristic visual information inherent in each painting style. Our study further suggests that discrimination of artistic styles is not a higher cognitive function that is unique to humans, but simply due to the capacity of animals—from insects to humans—to extract and categorize the visual characteristics of complex images.


Honeybee Learning Vision Discrimination Generalization 



We thank Chin Y. J. Yuen for help with the experiments, and Adrian Dyer and Allen Cheung for advice on the image analyses. W.W. was funded through an Australian Postgraduate Award by the Australian Government and an Australian Research Council Discovery grant to JT (DP0985830). A.M.M. was funded by a FAPESP doctorate scholarship (08/50576-8), Brazil.

Supplementary material

359_2012_767_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (866 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 865 kb)
359_2012_767_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (763 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 762 kb)
359_2012_767_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (997 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 997 kb)


  1. Abdi H, Valentin D, Edelman B, O’Toole AJ (1995) More about the difference between men and women: evidence from linear neural networks and the principal component approach. Percept 24:539–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avarguès-Weber A, Portelli G, Benard J, Dyer AG, Giurfa M (2010) Configural processing enables discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees. J Exp Biol 213:593–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avarguès-Weber A, Deisig N, Giurfa M (2011) Visual cognition in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 56:423–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avarguès-Weber A, Dyer AG, Combe M, Giurfa M (2012) Simultaneous mastering of two abstract concepts by the miniature brain of bees. PNAS 109:7481–7486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benard J, Stach S, Giurfa M (2006) Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Anim Cogn 9:257–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton AM, Bruce V, Hancock PJB (1999) From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cogn Sci 23:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittka L, Walker J (2006) Do bees like Van Gogh’s sunflowers? Optics Laser Technol 38:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chittka L, Walker J (2007) Insects as art lovers: bees for Van Gogh. Antennae 2:37–42Google Scholar
  9. Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collett TS (1996) Insect navigation en route to the goal—multiple strategies for the use of landmarks. J Exp Biol 199:227–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collett TS, Collett M (2002) Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:542–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collett TS, Graham P, Durier V (2003) Route learning by insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:718–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dyer AG (2012) The mysterious cognitive abilities of bees: why models of visual processing need to consider experience and individual differences in animal performance. J Exp Biol 215:387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyer AG, Griffiths DW (2012) Seeing near and seeing far: behavioural evidence for dual mechanisms of pattern vision in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Exp Biol 215:397–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dyer AG, Vuong QC (2008) Insect brains use image interpolation mechanisms to recognise rotated objects. PLoS ONE 3:e4086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dyer AG, Neumeyer C, Chittka L (2005) Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces. J Exp Biol 208:4709–4714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dyer AG, Rosa MGP, Reser DH (2008) Honeybees can recognise images of complex natural scenes for use as potential landmarks. J Exp Biol 211:1180–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giurfa M (2007) Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well. J Comp Physiol A 193:801–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giurfa M, Lehrer M (2001) Honeybee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giurfa M, Zhang SW, Jenett A, Menzel R, Srinivasan MV (2001) The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect. Nature 410:930–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giurfa M, Schubert M, Reisenman C, Gerber B, Lachnit H (2003) The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 145:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon R, Forge A (1983) Monet. Abrams, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Gould JL (1985) How bees remember flower shapes. Science 227:1492–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gould JL (1986) Pattern learning by honeybees. Anim Behav 34:990–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gross HJ, Pahl M, Si A, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang SW (2009) Number-based visual generalisation in the honeybee. PLoS ONE 4:e4263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horridge A (2000) Seven experiments on pattern vision of the honeybee, with a model. Vision Res 40:2589–2603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horridge A (2005) What the honeybee sees: a review of the recognition system of Apis mellifera. Physiol Entomol 30:2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horridge A (2007) The preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for different visual cues during the learning process. J Insect Physiol 53:877–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horridge A (2009a) Generalization in visual recognition by the honeybee (Apis mellifera): a review and explanation. J Insect Physiol 55:499–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horridge A (2009b) What does an insect see? J Exp Biol 212:2721–2729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehrer M, Campan R (2005) Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of? J Exp Biol 208:3233–3247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Toole AJ, Abdi H, Deffenbacher K, Valentin D (1993) Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of face space. J Opt Soc Am 10:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poggi C (1992) In defiance of painting: cubism, futurism and the invention of collage. Yale University Press, New Haven ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  34. Reinhard J, Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW (2006) Complex memories in honeybees: can there be more than two? J Comp Physiol A 192:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubin WS (1989) Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. Museum of Modern Art, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Srinivasan MV (2010) Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annu Rev Entomol 55:184–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Zhu H (1998) Honeybees link sights to smells. Nature 396:637–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stach S, Giurfa M (2005) The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 161:8–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stach S, Benard J, Giurfa M (2004) Local-feature assembling in visual pattern recognition and generalization in honeybees. Nature 429:758–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steffan-Dewenter I, Kuhn A (2003) Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:569–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuckey CF (1995) Claude Monet 1840–1926. Thames and Hudson, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 3:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. von Frisch K (1914) Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool Jb Physiol 37:1–238Google Scholar
  44. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Watanabe S (2001) Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons: picture discrimination in pigeons and humans. Anim Cogn 4:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watanabe S, Sakamoto J, Wakita M (1995) Pigeon’s discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. J Exp Anal Beh 63:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wehner R (1971) The generalization of directional visual stimuli in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Insect Physiol 7:1579–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zentall T, Wasserman EA, Lazareva OF, Thompson R, Ratterman MJ (2008) Concept learning in animals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 3:13–45Google Scholar
  49. Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV (2004) Exploration of cognitive capacity in honeybees: higher functions emerge from a small brain. In: Prete FR (ed) Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 41–74Google Scholar
  50. Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV, Collett TS (1995) Convergent processing in honeybee vision: multiple channels for the recognition of shape. PNAS 92:3029–3031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV, Zhu H, Wong J (2004) Grouping of visual objects by honeybees. J Exp Biol 207:3289–3298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen Wu
    • 1
  • Antonio M. Moreno
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jason M. Tangen
    • 1
  • Judith Reinhard
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Queensland Brain InstituteThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyFederal University of Sao CarlosSao CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations