Functionally redundant peg sensilla on the scorpion pecten

Original Paper

Abstract

All scorpions have two mid-ventral organs called pectines. Each pecten has thousands of pore-tipped sensilla sensitive to a variety of volatile organic and water-based stimulants. However, it was previously unknown whether individual sensilla were functionally identical or different. The information enhancement hypothesis predicts that all sensilla have similar chemosensitivities such that each is a unit of a parallel processing system. The information segmentation hypothesis states that sensilla differ in their chemosensitivities, a functional arrangement akin to the glomeruli-specific chemical detection system in the moth or human olfactory sense. In this study, we tested these hypotheses by extracellularly tip-recording sensillar responses to three aqueous tastants: 0.01 M KCl, 0.1 M citric acid, and 40% ethanol by volume. We isolated stimulation to one sensillum at a time and compared the chemoresponses. Sensilla appeared to respond similarly to the same stimulant (i.e., sensillar tip-recordings revealed activity of the same cell types), although sometimes a few sensilla responded with higher spike rates than the others. We conclude that our data primarily support the information enhancement hypothesis but for future tests of sensillar function we suggest a new hybrid model, which proposes that a few specialized sensilla exist among a mostly uniform field of identical sensilla.

Keywords

Chemosensation Scorpiones Pectines Electrophysiology Tastants 

References

  1. Benton TG (2001) Reproductive ecology. In: Brownell PH, Polis GA (eds) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 278–301Google Scholar
  2. Brownell PH (1998) Glomerular cytoarchitectures in chemosensory systems of arachnids. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:502–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownell PH (2001) Sensory ecology and orientational behaviors. In: Brownell PH, Polis GA (eds) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 159–183Google Scholar
  4. Carthy JD (1966) Fine structure and function of the sensory pegs on the scorpion pecten. Experientia 22:89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derby CD, Steullet P (2001) Why do animals have so many receptors? The role of multiple chemosensors in animal perception. Biol Bull 200:211–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foelix RF, Müller-Vorholt G (1983) The fine structure of scorpion sensory organs. II. Pecten sensilla. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 6:68–74Google Scholar
  7. Gaffin DD, Brownell PH (1992) Evidence of chemical signaling in the sand scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis (Scorpionida:Vaejovidae). Ethology 91:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaffin DD, Brownell PH (1997) Response properties of chemosensory peg sensilla on the pectines of scorpions. J Comp Physiol A 181:291–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaffin DD, Brownell PH (2001) Chemosensory behavior and physiology. In: Brownell PH, Polis GA (eds) Scorpion biology and research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 184–203Google Scholar
  10. Gaffin DD, Walvoord ME (2004) Scorpion peg sensilla: are they the same or are they different? In: Proceedings of the 3rd scorpiology symposium (Am Arachnol Soc, Norman, OK, 24 June 2004). Euscorpius 17:7–15Google Scholar
  11. Knowlton ED, Gaffin DD (2009) A new approach to examining scorpion peg sensilla: the mineral oil flood technique. J Arachnol 37:379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knowlton ED, Gaffin DD (2010) A new tip-recording method to test scorpion pecten chemoresponses to water-soluble stimulants. J Neurosci Methods 193:264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Melville JM, Tallarovic SK, Brownell PH (2003) Evidence of mate trailing in the giant hairy desert scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis (Scorpionida, Iuridae). J Insect Behav 16:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolf H (2008) The pectine organs of the scorpion, Vaejovis spinigerus: structure and (glomerular) central projections. Arthropod Struct Dev 37:67–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations