Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 196, Issue 10, pp 729–749 | Cite as

Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles

Review

Abstract

The role of pheromones in orchestrating social behaviors in reptiles is reviewed. Although all reptile orders are examined, the vast majority of the literature has dealt only with squamates, primarily snakes and lizards. The literature is surprisingly large, but most studies have explored relatively few behaviors. The evolution of chemical signaling in reptiles is discussed along with behaviors governed by pheromones including conspecific trailing, male-male agonistic interactions, sex recognition and sex pheromones, and reptilian predator recognition. Nonreptilian prey recognition by chemical cues was not reviewed. The recent literature has focused on two model systems where extensive chemical ecology studies have been conducted: the reproductive ecology of garter snakes and the behavioral ecology of Iberian lacertid lizards. In these two systems, enough is known about the chemical constituents that mediate behaviors to explore the evolution of chemical signaling mechanisms that affect life history patterns. In addition, these models illuminate natural and sexual selection processes which have lead to complex chemical signals whose different components and concentrations provide essential information about individuals to conspecifics. Reptiles provide excellent candidates for further studies in this regard not only in squamates, but also in the orders where little experimental work has been conducted to date.

Keywords

Pheromone Reptile Snake Lizard Tongue-flick Vomeronasal organ Trailing Reproduction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work of the authors was supported by the National Science Foundation IOB-0620125. This review was improved by the comments of two anonymous reviewers. We thank Matthieu Keller for asking us to write this review and for his patience.

References

  1. Alberts AC (1989) Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in desert iguanas: implications for pheromone detection. Anim Behav 38:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberts AC (1990) Chemical properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J Chem Ecol 16:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberts AC, Sharp TR, Werner DI, Weldon PJ (1992) Seasonal variation of lipids in femoral gland secretions of male green iguanas, Iguana iguana. J Chem Ecol 18:703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldridge R, Bufalino A, Reeves A (2005) Pheromone communication in the watersnake, Nerodia sipedon: a mechanistic difference between semi-aquatic and terrestrial species. Am Mid Nat 154:412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004a) Chemosensory recognition of its lizard prey by the ambush smooth snake, Coronella austriaca. J Herp 38:451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004b) Chemosensory recognition and behavioral responses of wall lizards, Podarcis muralis, to scents of snakes that pose different risks of predation. Copeia 2004:691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004c) Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Anim Behav 67:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004d) Multiple predators and conflicting refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Ann Zool Fennici 41:671–679Google Scholar
  9. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004e) Thermal dependence of chemical assessment of predation risk affects the ability of wall lizards, Podarcis muralis, to avoid unsafe refuges. Physiol Behav 82:913–918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2004f) Trade-offs in the choice of refuges by common wall lizards: do thermal costs affect preferences for predator free refuges? Can J Zool 82:897–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2005) Chemical assessment of predation risk in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis, is influenced by time exposed to chemical cues of ambush snakes. Herpetol J 15:21–25Google Scholar
  12. Amo L, López P, Martín J (2006) Can wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues to discriminate predatory from non-predatory snakes inside refuges? Ethology 112:478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Andrén C (1982) The role of the vomeronasal organs in the reproductive behavior of the adder, Vipera berus. Copeia 1982:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Andrén C (1986) Courtship, mating and agonistic behaviour in a free-living population of adders, Vipera berus (L.). Amphib-Rept 7:353–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2000) Size-dependent chemosensory responses to familiar and unfamiliar conspecific faecal pellets by the Iberian rock-lizard, Lacerta monticola. Ethology 106:1115–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2001a) Discrimination of femoral gland secretions from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Herp 35:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2001b) Effects of conspecific chemical cues on settlement and retreat-site selection of male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Herp 35:681–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2001c) Chemosensory discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by lizards: implications of field spatial relationships between males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2003) Differential avoidance responses to chemical cues from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by male Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola). J Herp 37:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Aragon P, López P, Martín J (2008) Increased predation risk modifies lizard scent-mark chemicals. J Exp Zool 309A:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Auffenberg W (1964) Notes on the courtship of the land tortoise Geochelone travancorica (Boulenger). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 61:247–253Google Scholar
  22. Auffenberg W (1966) On the courtship of Gopherus polyphemus. Herpetologica 22:113–117Google Scholar
  23. Auffenberg W (1969) Social behavior of Geochelone denticulata. Quart J Fla Acad Sci 32:50–58Google Scholar
  24. Baumann F (1927) Experimente über den Geruchsinn der Viper. Rev Suisse Zool 34:173–184Google Scholar
  25. Baumann F (1929) Experimente über den Geruchsinn und den Beuteerwerb der Viper (Vipera aspis). Z vergl Physiol 10:36–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bogert CM (1941) Sensory cues used by rattlesnakes in their recognition of ophidian enemies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 41:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brann JH, Fadool DA (2006) Vomeronasal sensory neurons from Sternotherus odoratus (stinkpot/musk turtle) respond to chemosignals via the phospholipase C system. J Exp Biol 209:1914–1927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brillet C (1990) Role des informations olfactives et visuelles dans la discrimination du sexe chez deux especes de geckos nocturnes: Eublepharis macularius et Paroedura pictus. Biol Behav 15:1–22Google Scholar
  29. Brown WS, MacLean FM (1983) Conspecific scent-trailing by newborn timber rattlesnakes, Crotalus horridus. Herpetologica 39:430–436Google Scholar
  30. Burger J (1989) Following of conspecific and avoidance of predator chemical cues by pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus). J Chem Ecol 15:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Burger J (1990) Response of hatchling pine snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) to chemical cues of sympatric snakes. Copeia 1990:1160–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Burger J, Boarman W, Kurzava L, Gochfeld M (1991) Effect of experience with pine (Pituophis melanoleucus) and king (Lampropeltis getulus) snake odors on Y-maze behavior of pine snake hatchlings. J Chem Ecol 17:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burghardt GM (1970) Chemical perception in reptiles. In: Johnston JW, Moulton DG, Turk M (eds) Communication by chemical signals. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 241–308Google Scholar
  34. Burghardt GM (1980) Behavioral and stimulus correlates of vomeronasal functioning in reptiles: feeding, grouping, sex, and tongue use. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals. Vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 275–301Google Scholar
  35. Burrage BR (1965) Copulation in a pair of Alligator mississippiensis. Brit J Herp 3:207–208Google Scholar
  36. Cabido C, Gonzalo A, Galan P, Martín J, López P (2004) Chemosensory predator recognition induces defensive behavior in the slow-worm (Anguis fragilis). Can J Zool 82:510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Carpenter CC, Ferguson GW (1977) Variation and evolution of stereotyped behavior in reptiles. In: Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds) Biology of the reptilia. Academic Press, New York, pp 335–554Google Scholar
  38. Chauhan NB (1986) A preliminary report on the lipid components of pre-anal gland secretion of lizards Hemidactylus flavoviridis and Uromastix hardwickii. J Anim Morphol Physiol 33:73–76Google Scholar
  39. Chiaraviglio M, Briguera V (2001) Participation of chemical cues in conspecific detection and sexual discrimination in Boa constrictor occidentalis (Serpentes: Boidae). Gayana 65:5–10Google Scholar
  40. Chiszar D, Scudder KM, Knight L, Smith HM (1978) Exploratory behavior in prairie rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) and water moccasins (Agkistrodon piscivorus). Psychol Rec 28:363–368Google Scholar
  41. Chiu KW, Maderson PFA (1975) The microscopic anatomy of epidermal glands in two species of gekkonine lizards, with some observations on testicular activity. J Morphol 147:23–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Cogger HG (1978) Reproductive cycles, fat body cycles and socio-sexual behaviour in the Mallee Dragon, Amphibolurus fordi (Lacertilia: Agamidae). Aust J Zool 26:653–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Cooper WE (1994) Chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in lizards: a review with hypotheses on its origin and its ecological and phylogenetic relationsips. J Chem Ecol 20:439–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Cooper WE (1995) Effects of estrogen and male head coloration on chemosensory investigation of female cloacal pheromones by male broad-headed skinks (Eumeces laticeps). Physiol Behav 58:1221–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Cooper WE (2007) Lizard chemical senses, chemosensory behavior, and foraging mode. In: Reilly S, McBrayer L, Miles D (eds) Lizard foraging behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 237–270Google Scholar
  46. Cooper WE, Alberts AC (1991) Tongue-flicking and biting in response to chemical food stimuli by an iguanid lizard (Dipsosaurus dorsalis) having sealed vomeronasal ducts: Vomerolfaction may mediate these behavioral responses. J Chem Ecol 17:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Cooper WE, Burghardt GM (1990) Vomerolfaction and vomodor. J Chem Ecol 16:103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Cooper WE, Garstka WR (1987) Lingual responses to chemical fractions of urodaeal glandular pheromone of the skink, Eumeces laticeps. J Exp Zool 242:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Cooper WE, Perez-Mellado V (2002) Pheromonal discriminations of sex, reproductive condition, and species by the lacertid lizard Podarcis hispanica. J Exp Zool 292:523–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Cooper WE, Steele LJ (1997) Pheromonal discrimination of sex by male and female leopard geckos (Eublepharus macularius). J Chem Ecol 23:2967–2977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Cooper WE, Trauth SE (1992) Discrimination of conspecific male and female cloacal chemical stimuli by males and possession of a probable pheromone gland by females in a cordylid lizard, Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus. Herpetologica 48:229–236Google Scholar
  52. Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1984) Conspecific odor detection by the male broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps: effects of sex and site of odor source and of male reproductive condition. J Exp Zool 230:199–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1986a) Interspecific odour discrimination by a lizard Eumeces laticeps. Anim Behav 34:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1986b) Interspecific odour discriminations among syntopic congeners in scincid lizards (genus Eumeces). Behaviour 97:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1986c) Tracking of female conspecific odor trails by male broad-headed skinks (Eumeces laticeps). Ethology 71:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Cooper WE, Garstka WR, Vitt LJ (1986) Female sex pheromone in the lizard Eumeces laticeps. Herpetologica 42:361–366Google Scholar
  57. Cooper WE, López P, Salvador A (1994) Pheromone detection by an Amphisbaenian. Anim Behav 47:1401–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Crews D (1976) Hormonal control of male courtship behavior and female attractivity in the garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). Horm Behav 7:451–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Duvall D (1986) A new question of pheromones: aspects of possible chemical signaling and reception in the mammal-like reptiles. In: Hotton N, MacLean PD, Roth JJ, Roth EC (eds) The ecology and biology of mammal-like reptiles. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 219–238Google Scholar
  60. Eisner T, Connor WE, Hicks K, Dodge KR, Rosenberg H, Jones TH, Cohen M, Meinwald J (1977) Stink of stinkpot turtle identified: ω-phenylalkanoic acids. Science 196:1374–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ernst CH (1971) Observations of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. J Herp 5:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ernst CH (1974) Observations on the courtship of male Graptemys pseudogeographica. J Herp 8:377–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Escobar CA, Labra A, Niemeyer HM (2001) Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of Liolaemus lizards. J Chem Ecol 27:1677–1690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Escobar CM, Escobar CA, Labra A, Niemeyer HM (2003) Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of two Liolaemus fabiani populations: are they different? J Chem Ecol 29:629–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Evans LT (1961) Structure as related to behavior in the organization of population in reptiles. In: Blair WF (ed) Vertebrate speciation. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 148–178Google Scholar
  66. Fadool DA, Wachowiak M, Brann JH (2001) Patch-clamp analysis of voltage-activated and chemically activated currents in the vomeronasal organ of Sternotherus odoratus (stinkpot/musk turtle). J Exp Biol 204:4199–4212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Ferguson GW (1966) Releasers of courtship and territorial behaviour in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Anim Behav 14:89–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Fisher J (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 71–83Google Scholar
  69. Ford NB (1978) Evidence for species specificity of pheromone trails in two sympatric garter snakes, Thamnophis. Herpetol Rev 9:10–11Google Scholar
  70. Ford NB (1981) Seasonality of pheromone trailing behavior in two species of garter snake, Thamnophis (Colubridae). Southwest Nat 26:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ford NB (1982) Species specificity of sex pheromone trails of sympatric and allopatric garter snakes. Copeia 1982:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ford NB (1986) The role of pheromone trails in the sociobiology of snakes. In: Duvall D, Müeller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 261–278Google Scholar
  73. Ford NB, Low JR Jr (1983) Sex pheromone source location by snakes: a mechanism for detection of direction in nonvolatile trails. J Chem Ecol 10:1193–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ford NB, O’Bleness ML (1986) Species and sexual specificity of pheromone trails of the garter snake, Thamnophis marcianus. J Herp 20:259–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ford NB, Schofield CW (1984) Species-specificity of sex pheromone trails in the plains garter snake, Thamnophis radix. Herpetologica 40:51–55Google Scholar
  76. Fornasiero S, Bresciani E, Dendi F, Zuffi MAL (2007) Pheromone trailing in male European whip snake, Hierophis viridiflavus. Amphib-Rept 28:555–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Franceschini V, Lazzari M, Ciana F (1996) Identification of surface glycoconjugates in the olfactory system of turtle. Brain Res 725:81–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Fritts TH, McCoid MJ, Haddock RL (1990) Risks to infants on Guam from bites by the brown tree snake (Colubridae: Boiga irregularis). J Herp 28:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Gabirot M, López P, Martín J, de Fraipont M, Heulin B, Sinervo B, Clobert J (2008) Chemical composition of femoral secretions of oviparous and viviparous types of male common lizards Lacerta vivipara. Biochem Syst Ecol 36:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Garrick LD (1978) Love among the alligators. Anim King 78:2–8Google Scholar
  81. Gehlbach FR, Watkins JF, Reno HW (1968) Blind snake defensive behavior elicited by ant attacks. BioSci 18:784–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Gillingham JC (1987) Social behavior. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT, Novak SS (eds) Snakes: ecology and evolutionary biology. Macmillan, New York, pp 184–209Google Scholar
  83. Glinski TH, Krekorian CO (1985) Individual recognition in free-living adult male desert iguanas, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J Herp 19:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Gonzalo A, Cabido C, Martín J, López P (2004) Detection and discrimination of conspecific scents by the anguid slow-worm Anguis fragilis. J Chem Ecol 30:1565–1573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Graves BM, Duvall D (1988) Evidence of an alarm pheromone from the cloacal sacs of prairie rattlesnakes. Southwest Nat 33:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Graves BM, Halpern M (1989) Chemical access to the vomeronasal organs of the lizard Chalcides ocellatus. J Exp Zool 249:150–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Graves BM, Halpern M (1990) Roles of vomeronasal organ chemoreception in tongue-flicking, exploratory and feeding behaviour of the lizard, Chalcides ocellatus. Anim Behav 39:692–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Graves BM, Duvall D, King MB, Lindstedt SL, Gern WA (1986) Initial den location by neonatal prairie rattlesnakes: functions, causes, and natural history in chemical ecology. In: Duvall D, Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4, ecology, evolution, and comparative biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 285–304Google Scholar
  89. Greenberg B (1943) Social behavior of the Western banded gecko, Coleonyx variegatus baird. Physiol Zool 16:110–122Google Scholar
  90. Greene MJ, Mason RT (1998) Chemically mediated sexual behavior of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis. EcoSci 5:405–409Google Scholar
  91. Greene MJ, Mason RT (2000) Courtship, mating, and male combat of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis. Herpetologica 56:166–175Google Scholar
  92. Greene MJ, Mason RT (2003) Pheromonal inhibition of male courtship behaviour in the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis: a mechanism for the rejection of potential mates. Anim Behav 65:905–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Greene MJ, Stark SL, Mason RT (2001) Pheromone trailing behavior of the brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis. J Chem Ecol 27:2193–2201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Greene MJ, Stark SL, Mason RT (2002) Predatory response of brown tree snakes to chemical stimuli from human skin. J Chem Ecol 28:2465–2473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Gregory PT (1977) Life-history parameters of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in an extreme environment, the Interlake region of Manitoba. Nat Mus Can Pub Zool 13:1–44Google Scholar
  96. Gregory PT, Macartney JM, Larsen KW (1987) Spatial patterns and movements. In: Seigel RA, Collins JT, Novak SS (eds) Snakes: ecology and evolutionary biology. Macmillan, New York, pp 366–395Google Scholar
  97. Halpern M (1992) Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of the reptilia: hormones, brain, and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 423–523Google Scholar
  98. Halpern M, Frumin MN (1979) Roles of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems in prey attack and feeding in adult garter snakes. Physiol Behav 22:1183–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Halpern M, Kubie JL (1980) Chemical access to the vomeronasal organ of the garter snakes. Physiol Behav 24:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Halpern M, Martinez-Marcos A (2003) Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: an update. Prog Neurobiol 70:245–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Hatanaka T, Shibuya T, Inouchi J (1988) Induced wave responses of the accessory olfactory bulb to odorants in two species of turtle, Pseudemys scripta and Geoclemys reevesii. Comp Biochem Physiol 91A:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Heller SB, Halpern M (1981) Laboratory observations on conspecific and congeneric scent trailing in garter snakes (Thamnophis). Behav Neural Biol 33:372–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Heller SB, Halpern M (1982) Laboratory observations of aggregative behavior of garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis: roles of the visual, olfactory, and vomeronasal senses. J Comp Physiol Psych 96:984–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Houck LD (2009) Pheromone communication in amphibians and reptiles. Ann Rev Physiol 71:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Huang G-Z, Zhang J-J, Wang D, Mason RT, Halpern M (2006) Female sex pheromone induces membrane responses in vomeronasal sensory neurons of male snakes. Chem Senses 31:521–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Jackson CG, Davis JD (1972) Courtship display behavior of Chrysemys concinna suwanniensis. Copeia 1972:385–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Johnsen PB, Wellington JL (1982) Detection of glandular secretions by yearling alligators. Copeia 1982:705–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kool K (1981) Is the musk of the long-necked turtle, Chelodina longicollis, a deterrent to predators? Aust J Herp 1:45–53Google Scholar
  109. Kopena R, López P, Martín J (2009) Lipophilic compounds from the femoral gland secretions of male Hungarian green lizards, Lacerta viridis. Z Naturforsch C 64:434–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Kramer M, Fritz U (1989) Courtship of the turtle, Pseudemys nelsoni. J Herp 23:84–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Kubie JL, Vagvolgyi A, Halpern M (1978) The roles of the vomeronasal and olfactory systems in the courtship behavior of male snakes. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:627–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2001a) Evidence for a female sex pheromone mediating male trailing behavior in the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Chemoecol 11:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2001b) Annual and seasonal variation in the female sexual attractiveness pheromone of the red-sided garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis). In: Marchlewska-Koj A, Lepri J, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 9. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 369–374Google Scholar
  114. LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2002) Variation in a female sexual attractiveness pheromone controls male mate choice in garter snakes. J Chem Ecol 28:1269–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2003) Pheromonally mediated sexual isolation among denning populations of red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. J Chem Ecol 29:1027–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. LeMaster MP, Moore IT, Mason RT (2001) Conspecific trailing behaviour of red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis, in the natural environment. Anim Behav 61:827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. LeMaster MP, Stefani A, Shine R, Mason RT (2008) Cross-dressing in chemical cues: exploring “she-maleness” in newly emerged male garter snakes. In: Hurst J, Beynon R, Roberts S, Wyatt T (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 11. Springer, London, pp 223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lewis CH, Molloy SF, Chambers RM, Davenport J (2007) Response of common musk turtles (Sternotherus odoratus) to intraspecific chemical cues. J Herp 41:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. López P, Martín J (2001a) Pheromonal recognition of females takes precedence over the chromatic cue in male Iberian wall lizards Podarcus hispanica. Ethology 107:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. López P, Martín J (2001b) Chemosensory predator recognition induces specific defensive behaviours in a fossorial amphisbaenian. Anim Behav 62:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. López P, Martín J (2002) Chemical rival recognition decreases aggression levels in male Iberian wall lizards, Podarcis hispanica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. López P, Martín J (2005a) Chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola cyreni. Z Naturforsch C 60:632–636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. López P, Martín J (2005b) Age related differences in lipophilic compounds found in femoral gland secretions of male spiny-footed lizards, Acanthodactylus erythrurus. Z Naturforsch C 61:915–920Google Scholar
  124. López P, Martín J (2005c) Intersexual differences in chemical composition of precloacal gland secretions of the amphisbaenian Blanus cinereus. J Chem Ecol 31:2913–2921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. López P, Martín J (2005d) Female Iberian wall lizards prefer male scents that signal a better cell-mediated immune response. Biol Lett 1:404–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. López P, Martín J (2006) Lipids in the femoral gland secretions of male Scheiber’s green lizards, Lacerta schreiberi. Z Naturforsch C 61:763–768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. López P, Martín J (2009a) Lipids in femoral gland secretions of male lizards, Psammodromus hispanicus. Biochem Syst Ecol 37:304–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. López P, Martín J (2009b) Potential chemosignals associated with male identity in the Amphisbaenian Blanus cinereus. Chem Senses 34:479–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. López P, Aragon P, Martín J (1998) Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta moticola cyreni) assess conspecific information using composite signals from faecal pellets. Ethology 104:809–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. López P, Martín J, Cuadrado M (2002a) Pheromone-mediated intrasexual aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanicus. Aggr Behav 28:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. López P, Muñoz A, Martín J (2002b) Symmetry, male dominance and female mate preferences in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. López P, Aragon P, Martín J (2003a) Responses of female lizards, Lacerta monticola, to males’ chemical cues reflect their mating preference for older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. López P, Martín J, Cuadrado M (2003b) Chemosensory cues allow male lizards Psammodromus algirus to override visual concealment of sexual identity by satellite males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. López P, Amo L, Martín J (2006) Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Chem Ecol 32:473–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. López P, Gabirot M, Martín J (2009) Immune activation affects chemical sexual ornaments of male Iberian wall lizards. Naturwissenschaften 96:65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Louw S, Burger BV, LeRoux M, Van Wyk JH (2007) Lizard epidermal gland secretions I: chemical characterization of the femoral gland secretion of the sungazer, Cordylus giganteus. J Chem Ecol 33:1806–1818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Maderson PFA (1986) Tetrapod epidermis: a system protoadapted as a semiochemical source. In: Duvall D, Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4, ecology, evolution, and comparative biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 13–26Google Scholar
  138. Madison DM (1977) Chemical communcation in amphibians and reptiles. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Mozell MM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 135–168Google Scholar
  139. Mahmoud IY (1967) Courtship behavior and sexual maturity in four species of kinosternid turtles. Copeia 1967:314–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Martín J, López P (2000) Chemoreception, symmetry and mate choice in lizards. Proc R Soc B 267:1265–1269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Martín J, López P (2006a) Interpopulational differences in chemical composition and chemosensory recognition of femoral gland secretions of male lizards Podarcis hispanica: implications for sexual isolation in a species complex. Chemoecology 16:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Martín J, López P (2006b) Age-related variation in lipophilic chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male lizards Psammodromus algirus. Biochem Syst Ecol 34:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Martín J, López P (2006c) Chemosensory responses by female Iberian wall lizards, Podarcis hispanica to selected lipids found in femoral gland secretions of males. J Herp 40:556–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Martín J, López P (2006d) Vitamin D supplementation increases the attractiveness of males’ scent for female Iberian rock lizards. Proc R Soc B 273:2619–2624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Martín J, López P (2006e) Links between male quality, male chemical signals, and female choice in Iberian rock lizards. Funct Ecol 20:1087–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Martín J, López P (2007) Scent may signal fighting ability in male Iberian rock lizards. Biol Lett 3:125–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Martín J, López P (2008a) Female sensory bias may allow honest chemical signaling by male Iberian rock lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1927–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Martín J, López P (2008b) Intersexual differences in chemosensory responses to selected lipids reveal different messages conveyed by femoral secretions of male Iberian rock lizards. Amphib Rept 29:572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Martín J, López P (2010) Condition-dependent pheromone signaling by male rock lizards: more oily scents are more attractive. Chem Senses 35:253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Martín J, Moreira PL, López P (2007a) Status-signaling chemical badges in male Iberian rock lizards. Funct Ecol 21:568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Martín J, Civantos E, Amo L, López P (2007b) Chemical ornaments of male lizard Psammodromus algirus may reveal their parasite load and health state to females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Martín J, López P, Gabirot M, Pilz KM (2007c) Effects of testosterone supplementation on chemical signals of male Iberian wall lizards: consequences for female mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1275–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Martín J, Amo L, López P (2008) Parasites and health affect multiple sexual signals in male common lizards, Podarcus muralis. Naturwissenschaften 95:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Mason RT (1992) Reptilian pheromones. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of the reptilia: hormones, brain, and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 114–128Google Scholar
  155. Mason RT (1993) Chemical ecology of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Brain Behav Evol 41:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Mason RT, Crews D (1985) Female mimicry in garter snakes. Nature 316:59–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Mason RT, Crews D (1986) Pheromone mimicry in garter snakes. In: Duvall D, Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4, ecology, evolution, and comparative biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 279–283Google Scholar
  158. Mason RT, Gutzke WHN (1990) Sex recognition in the Leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius (Sauria: Gekkonidae): possible mediation by skin-derived semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol 16:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Mason RT, Fales HM, Jones TH, Pannell LK, Chinn JW, Crews D (1989) Sex pheromones in snakes. Science 245:290–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Mason RT, Jones TH, Fales HM, Pannell LK, Crews D (1990) Characterization, synthesis, and behavioral response to the sex attractiveness pheromones of the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. J Chem Ecol 16:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Mason RT, Chivers D, Mathis A, Blaustein AR (1998) Bioassays with amphibians and reptiles. In: Millar J, Haynes K (eds) Methods in chemical ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 271–325Google Scholar
  162. McCarthy CJ (1986) Relationships of the laticaudine sea snakes (Serpentes: Elapidae: Laticaudinae). Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist (Zool.) 50:127–161Google Scholar
  163. McIlhenny EA (1935) The alligator’s life history. Christopher Publishing House, BostonGoogle Scholar
  164. Mendonça M, Crews D (2001) Control of attractivity and receptivity in female red-sided garter snakes. Horm Behav 40:43–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Moreira PL, López P, Martín J (2006) Femoral secretions and copulatory plugs convey chemical information about male identity and dominance status in Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:166–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Moreira PL, López P, Martín J (2008) Discrimination of conspecific fecal chemicals and spatial decisions in juvenile Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta moticola). Acta Ethol 11:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Muñoz A (2004) Chemo-orientation using conspecific chemical cues in the stripe-necked terrapin (Mauremys leprosa). J Chem Ecol 30:1561–1573Google Scholar
  168. Murata Y, Jones TH, Pannell LK, Yeh H, Fales HM, Mason RT (1991) New ketodienes from the integumental lipids of the Guam brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis. J Nat Prod 54:233–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Nilson G, Andrén C (1982) Function of renal sex secretion and male hierarchy in the adder, Vipera berus, during reproduction. Horm Behav 16:404–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Noble GK (1937) The sense organs involved in the courtship of Storeria, Thamnophis, and other snakes. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 73:673–725Google Scholar
  171. Noble GK, Clausen HJ (1936) The aggregation behavior of Storeria dekayi and other snakes, with especial reference to the sense organs involved. Ecol Monogr 6:271–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. O’Donnell RP, Ford NB, Shine R, Mason RT (2004) Male red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) determine female mating status from pheromone trails. Anim Behav 68:677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Parker MR, Mason RT (2009) Low temperature dormancy affects both the quantity and quality of the female sexual attractiveness pheromone in red-sided garter snakes. J Chem Ecol 35:1234–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Phillips JA, Alberts AC (1992) Naive ophiophagus lizards recognize and avoid venomous snakes using chemical cues. J Chem Ecol 18:1775–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Polo-Cavia N, López P, Martín J (2009) Interspecific differences in chemosensory responses of freshwater turtles: consequences for competition between native and invasive species. Biol Inv 11:431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Poschadel JR, Meyer-Lucht Y, Plath M (2006) Response to chemical cues from conspecifics reflects male mating preference for large females and avoidance of large competitors in the European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis. Behaviour 143:569–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Price AH, LaPointe JL (1981) Structure-functional aspects of the scent gland in Lampropeltis getulus splendida. Copeia 1981:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Rose FL (1970) Tortoise chin gland fatty acid composition: behavioral significance. Comp Biochem Physiol 32:577–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Ross P, Crews D (1977) Influence of the seminal plug on mating behavior in the garter snake. Nature 267:344–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Ross P, Crews D (1978) Stimuli influencing mating behavior in the garter snake, Thamnophis radix. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Schwenk K (1985) Occurrence, distribution, and functional significance of taste buds in lizards. Copeia 1985:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Seigel RA (1980) Courtship and mating behavior of the diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin tequesta. J Herp 14:420–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Shine R (2005) All at sea: aquatic life modifies mate-recognition modalities in sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus, Hydrophiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Shine R, Mason R (2001) Courting male garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) use multiple cues to identify potential mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Shine R, Harlow P, LeMaster MP, Moore IT, Mason RT (2000a) The transvestite serpent: Why do male garter snakes court (some) other males? Anim Behav 59:349–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Shine R, Olsson MM, Mason RT (2000b) Chastity belts in gartersnakes: the functional significance of mating plugs. Biol J Linn Soc 70:377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Shine R, O’Connor D, Mason RT (2000c) Female mimicry in gartersnakes: behavioural tactics of “she-males” and the males that court them. Can J Zool 78:1391–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Shine R, Olsson MM, Moore IT, LeMaster MP, Greene MJ, Mason RT (2000d) Body size enhances mating success in male garter snakes. Anim Behav 59:F4–F11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Shine R, Phillips B, Waye H, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2001) Advantage of female mimicry in snakes. Nature 414:267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Shine R, Reed RN, Shetty S, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2002) Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric sibling species of sea snakes. Evolution 56:1655–1662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Shine R, Phillips B, Waye H, LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2003) Chemosensory cues allow courting male garter snakes to assess body length and body condition of potential mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:162–166Google Scholar
  192. Shine R, Langkilde T, Wall M, Mason RT (2005a) Do female garter snakes evade males to avoid harassment or to enhance mate quality? Am Nat 165:660–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Shine R, Webb JK, Lane A, Mason RT (2005b) Mate-location tactics in garter snakes: effects of rival males, interrupted trails, and non-pheromonal cues. Funct Ecol 19:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Shoji T, Kurihara K (1991) Sensitivity and transduction mechanisms of responses to general odorants in turtle vomeronasal system. J Gen Physiol 98:909–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Simon CA (1983) A review of lizard chemoreception. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 119–133Google Scholar
  196. Thoen C, Bauwens D, Verheyen RF (1986) Chemoreceptive and behavioral responses of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara to snake chemical deposits. Anim Behav 34:1805–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Tinkle DW (1967) The life and demography of the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 132:1–182Google Scholar
  198. Tollestrup K (1981) The social behavior and displays of two species of horned lizards, Phrynosoma platyrhinos and Phrynosoma coronatum. Herpetologica 37:130–141Google Scholar
  199. Vagvolgyi A, Halpern M (1983) Courtship behavior in garter snakes: effects of artificial hibernation. Can J Zool 61:1171–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Van Damme R, Castilla AM (1996) Chemosensory predator recognition in the lizard Podarcis hispanica: effects of predation pressure relaxation. J Chem Ecol 22:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Van Damme R, Bauwens D, Thoen C, Vanderstighelen D, Verheyen RF (1995) Responses of naive lizards to predator chemical cues. J Herp 29:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Weaver WG (1970) Courtship and combat behavior in Gopherus berlandieri. Bull Fla St Mus Biol Sci 15:1–43Google Scholar
  203. Weldon PJ (1982) Responses to ophiophagous snakes by snakes of the genus Thamnophis. Copeia 1982:788–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Weldon PJ, Burghardt GM (1979) The ophiophage defensive response in Crotaline snakes: extension to new taxa. J Chem Ecol 5:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Weldon PJ, Fagre DB (1989) Responses by canids to scent gland secretions of the western diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). J Chem Ecol 15:1589–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Weldon PJ, Dunn BS Jr, McDaniel CA, Werner DI (1990) Lipids in the femoral gland secretions of the green iguana (Iguana iguana). Comp Biochem Physiol 95B:541–543Google Scholar
  207. Weldon PJ, Ortiz R, Sharp TR (1992) The chemical ecology of crotaline snakes. In: Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr (eds) Biology of the pitvipers. Selva, Tyler, TX, pp 309–319Google Scholar
  208. Weldon PJ, Flachsbarth B, Schulz S (2008) Natural products from the integument of nonavian reptiles. Nat Prod Rep 25:738–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Werner DI (1978) On the biology of Tropidurus delanonis, Baur (Iguanidae). Z Tierpsych 47:337–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Whiting MJ, Webb JK, Keogh JS (2009) Flat lizard female mimics use sexual deception in visual but not chemical signals. Proc R Soc B 276:1585–1591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Whittier JM, Mason RT, Crews D (1985) Mating in the red-sided garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis: differential effects on male and female sexual behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations