Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 196, Issue 12, pp 889–897 | Cite as

Regularly firing neurons in the inferior colliculus have a weak interaural intensity difference sensitivity

Original Paper

Abstract

The spike discharge regularity may be important in the processing of information in the auditory pathway. It has already been shown that many cells in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus fire regularly in response to monaural stimulation by the best frequency tones. The aim of this study was to find how the regularity of units was affected by adding ipsilateral tone, and how interaural intensity difference sensitivity is related to regularity. Single unit recordings were performed from 66 units in the inferior colliculus of the anaesthetized guinea pig in response to the best frequency tone. Regularity of firing was measured by calculating the coefficient of variation as a function of time of a unit’s response. There was a positive correlation between coefficient of variation and interaural intensity difference sensitivity, indicating that highly regular units had very weak and irregular units had strong interaural intensity difference sensitivity responses. Three effects of binaural interaction on the sustained regularity were observed: constant coefficient of variation despite change in rate (66% of the units), negative (20%) and positive (13%) rate–CV relationships. A negative rate-coefficient of variation relationship was the dominant pattern of binaural interaction on the onset regularity.

Keywords

Regularity Inferior colliculus Binaural Interaural intensity difference 

Abbreviations

BF

Best frequency

CV

Coefficient of variation

IC

Inferior colliculus

ICC

Central nucleus of IC

IID

Interaural intensity difference

ISI

Interspike interval

LSO

Lateral superior olive

PSTH

Post-stimulus time histogram

References

  1. Blackburn CC, Sachs MB (1990) The representation of the steady-state vowel sound /e/ in the discharge patterns of cat anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 63:1191–1212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourk TR (1976) Electrical responses of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Caird DM, Klinke R (1987) Processing of interaural time and intensity differences in the cat inferior colliculus. Exp Brain Res 68:379–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Faingold CL, Gehlbach G, Caspary DM (1989) On the role of GABA as an inhibitory neurotransmitter in inferior colliculus neurons: iontophoretic studies. Brain Res 500:302–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Flecknell PA (1988) Laboratory animal anaesthesia. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Irvine DRF (1986) The auditory midbrain: anatomy and physiology. In: Irvine DRF (ed) Progress in sensory physiology 7: the auditory brain stem. pp 128–209Google Scholar
  7. Klug A, Park TJ, Pollak GD (1995) Glycine and GABA influence binaural processing in the inferior colliculus of the mustache bat. J Neurophysiol 74:1701–1713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Li L, Kelly JB (1992) Binaural responses in rat inferior colliculus following kainic acid lesions of the superior olive: interaural intensity difference functions. Hear Res 61:73–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Merrill EG, Ainsworth A (1972) Glass-coated platinum coated tungsten microelectrodes. Med Biol Eng 10:662–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Park TJ (1998) IID sensitivity differs between two principal centers in the interaural intensity difference pathway: the LOS and the IC. J Neurophysiol 79:2416–2431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Park TJ, Pollak GD (1993) GABA shapes sensitivity to interaural intensity disparities in the mustache bat’s inferior colliculus: implications for encoding sound location. J Neurosci 13:2050–2067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rees A (1990) A closed field sound system for auditory neurophysiology. J Physiol Lond 430:6 (abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Rees A, Sarbaz A (1997) The influence of intrinsic oscillations on the encoding of amplitude modulation by neurons in the inferior colliculus. In: Syka J (ed) Acoustical signal processing in the central auditory system. Plenum, New York, pp 239–252Google Scholar
  14. Rees A, Sarbaz A, Malmierca MS, Le Beau FEJ (1997) Regularity of firing of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Neurophysiology 77(6):2945–2965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rhode WS, Greenberg S (1994) Encoding amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 71:1797–1825PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sally SL, Kelly JB (1992) Effects of superior olivary complex lesions on binaural responses in rat inferior colliculus. Brain Res 572:5–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Semple MN, Kitzes LM (1987) Binaural processing of sound pressure level in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 57:1130–1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shofner WP, Dye RH (1989) Statistical and receiver operating characteristic analysis of empirical spike-count distributions: quantifying the ability of cochlear nucleus units to signal intensity changes. J Acoust Soc Am 86:2172–2184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sivaramakrishnan S, Oliver DL (2001) Distinct K currents result in physiologically distinct cell types in the inferior colliculus of the rat. J Neurosci 21(8):2861–2877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsuchitani C (1988) The inhibition of cat lateral superior olive unit excitatory responses to binaural tone bursts. II. The sustained discharges. J Neurophysiol 59:184–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vater M, Habbicht H, Kossl M, Grothe B (1992) The functional role of GABA and glycine in monaural and binaural processing in the inferior colliculus of horseshoe bats. J Comp Physiol 171:541–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Young ED, Robert JM, Shofner WP (1988) Regularity and latency of units in ventral cochlear nucleus. Implications for unit classification and generation of response properties. J Neurophysiol 60:1–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zheng Y, Escabí MA (2008) Distinct roles for onset and sustained activity in the neuronal code for temporal periodicity and acoustic envelope shape. J Neurosci 28(52):14230–14244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  2. 2.School of Neurology, Neurobiology, and PsychiatryUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations