Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 196, Issue 6, pp 439–451 | Cite as

Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise

  • Marco Lugli
Original Paper

Abstract

The habitat ambient noise may exert an important selective pressure on frequencies used in acoustic communication by animals. A previous study demonstrated the presence of a match between the low-frequency quiet region of the stream ambient noise (termed ‘quiet window’) and the main frequencies used for sound production and hearing by two stream gobies (Padogobius bonelli, Gobius nigricans). The present study examines the spectral features of ambient noise in very shallow freshwater, brackish and marine habitats and correlates them to the range of dominant frequencies of sounds used by nine species of Mediterranean gobies reproducing in these environments. Ambient noise spectra of these habitats featured a low-frequency quiet window centered at 100 Hz (stream, sandy/rocky sea shore), or at 200 Hz (spring, brackish lagoon). The analysis of the ambient noise/sound spectrum relationships showed the sound frequencies matched the frequency band of the quiet window in the ambient noise typical of their own habitat. Analogous ambient noise/sound frequency relationships were observed in other shallow-water teleosts living in similar underwater environments. Conclusions may be relevant to the understanding of evolution of fish acoustic communication and hearing.

Keywords

Ambient noise Acoustic windows Fish sounds Low-frequency communication Gobies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Romano Romani for help in data collection and Stefano Malavasi for providing sound recordings from lagoon and marine gobies. The manuscript was improved by comments from Antonio Bodini, Michael Fine, Tony Hawkins and two anonymous referees. This study was supported by grants from the University of Parma (FIL 2006).

This study conforms to the National Ethical Guidelines (Italian Ministry of Health; D.L.vo 116, January 27, 1992).

Supplementary material

359_2010_528_MOESM1_ESM.doc (146 kb)
Supplementary material (DOC 146 kb)

References

  1. Akamatsu T, Okumura T, Novarini N, Yan HY (2002) Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks. J Acoust Soc Am 112:3073–3082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amoser S, Ladich F (2005) Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fishes adapted to the ambient noise of their habitats? J Exp Biol 208:3533–3542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennet-Clark HC (1999) Which Qs to choose: questions of quality in bioacoustics. Bioacoustics 9:351–359Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury JW, Veherencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Breder CM Jr, Rosen DE (1966) Modes of reproduction in fishes. The American Museum of Natural History, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav 35:151–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey WM, Fitzgerald JW (1993) Low-frequency noise from breaking waves. In: Kerman BR (ed) Natural physical sources of underwater sound (sea surface sound, 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Cambridge (UK), pp 277–304Google Scholar
  8. Coers A, Bouton N, Vincourt D, Slabbekoorn H (2008) Fluctuating noise conditions may limit acoustic communication distance in rock-pool blenny. Bioacoustics 17:63–64Google Scholar
  9. De la Torre S, Snowdon CT (2002) Environmental correlates of vocal communication of wild pygmy marmosets, Cebuella pygmaea. Anim Behav 62:847–856Google Scholar
  10. Dijkgraaf S (1952) Über die Schallwahrnehmung bei Meeresfischen. Z Vergl Physiol 34:104–122Google Scholar
  11. Fine ML (1978) Seasonal and geographic variation of the mating call of the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau. Oecologia 36:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fine ML, Lenhardt ML (1983) Shallow-water propagation of the toadfish mating call. Comp Biochem Physiol 76A:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fine ML, Winn HE, Olla BL (1977) Communication in fishes. In: Sebeok TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 472–518Google Scholar
  14. Gandolfi G, Zerunian S, Torricelli P, Marconato A (1991) I pesci delle acque interne italiane (Inland waters fishes of Italy). Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, RomaGoogle Scholar
  15. Hawkins AD (1981) The hearing abilities of fish. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, New-York, pp 109–137Google Scholar
  16. Hawkins AD, Myrberg AA Jr (1983) Hearing and sound communication under water. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics: a comparative approach. Academic Press, London, pp 347–405Google Scholar
  17. Ibara RM, Penny LT, Ebling AW, van Dykhuisen G, Caillet G (1983) The mating call of the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. In: Noakes DLG (ed) Predators and preys in fishes. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague (The Netherlands), pp 205–212Google Scholar
  18. Johnston CE, Johnson DL (2000) Sound production during spawning season in cavity nesting darters of the subgenus Catonotus (Percidae: Etheostoma). Copeia 2:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston CE, Vives SP (2003) Sound production in Codoma ornata (Girard) (Cyprinidae). Environ Biol Fishes 68:81–85Google Scholar
  20. Knudsen VO, Alford RS, Emling JW (1948) Underwater ambient noise. J Mar Res 3:410–429Google Scholar
  21. Lindström K, Lugli M (2000) A quantitative analysis of the courtship acoustic behavior and sound patterning in male sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Environ Biol Fishes 58:411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lohr B, Wright TF, Dooling RJ (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal. Anim Behav 65:763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lugli M (2002) Environmental constraints on the acoustic communication system of stream gobies. Bioacoustics (special issue on Fish Bioacoustics) 12:252–255Google Scholar
  24. Lugli M (2008) Role of ambient noise as a selective factor for frequencies used in fish acoustic communication. Bioacoustics 17:40–42Google Scholar
  25. Lugli M, Fine ML (2003) Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: ambient noise and short-range propagation in shallow streams. J Acoust Soc Am 114:512–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lugli M, Torricelli P (1999) Prespawning sound production in mediterranean sand-gobies. J Fish Biol 54:691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lugli M, Pavan G, Torricelli P, Bobbio L (1995) Spawning vocalizations in male freshwater gobies (Pisces, Gobiidae). Environ Biol Fishes 43:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lugli M, Torricelli P, Pavan G, Miller PJ (1996) Breeding sounds of male Padogobius nigricans (Teleostei: Gobiidae) with suggestions for further evolutionary study of vocal behaviour in gobiid fishes. J Fish Biol 49:648–657Google Scholar
  29. Lugli M, Torricelli P, Pavan G, Mainardi D (1997) Sound production during courtship and spawning among freshwater gobiids (Pisces, Gobiidae). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 29:109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lugli M, Yan HY, Fine ML (2003) Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum. J Comp Physiol A 189:309–320Google Scholar
  31. Malavasi S, Torricelli P, Lugli M, Pranovi F, Mainardi D (2003) Male courtship sounds in a teleost with alternative reproductive tactics, the grass goby Zosterisessor ophiocephalus. Environ Biol Fishes 66:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malavasi S, Franco A, Fiorin R, Franzoi P, Torricelli P, Mainardi D (2005) The shallow water gobiid assemblage of the Venice lagoon: abundance, seasonal variation and habitat partitioning. J Fish Biol 67:146–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malavasi S, Colatuzzo S, Torricelli P (2008) Interspecific variation of acoustic signals in Mediterranean gobies (Perciformes, Gobiidae): comparative analysis and evolutionary outlook. Biol J Linn Soc 93:763–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michelsen A (1983) Biophysical basis of sound communication. In: Lewis B (ed) Bioacoustics: a comparative approach. Academic Press, London, pp 3–38Google Scholar
  35. Myrberg AA Jr (1981) Social communication and interception in fishes. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, New-York, pp 395–425Google Scholar
  36. Myrberg AA Jr, Lugli M (2007) Reproductive behavior and acoustical interactions. In: Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoor BG (eds) Communication in fishes, vol 1. Science Publishers, Enfield (NH), pp 149–176Google Scholar
  37. Narins PM, Feng AS, Lin W, Schnitzler H-U, Denzinger A, Suthers RA, Xu C (2004) Old World frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 115:910–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Prosperetti A (1988) Bubble-related ambient noise in the ocean. J Acoust Soc Am 84:1042–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson WJ, Green CR Jr, Malme CI, Thomson DH (1995) Marine mammals and noise. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers PH, Cox M (1988) Underwater sounds as a biological stimulus. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer, New York, pp 131–149Google Scholar
  41. Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stadler JH (2000) Species-recognition and sex-recognition by males of the notchtongue goby, Bathygobius curacao. PhD dissertation, University of Miami, Miami, FLGoogle Scholar
  44. Stout JF (1975) Sound communication during the reproductive behavior of Notropis analostanus (Pisces; Cyprinidae). Am Midl Nat 94:296–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tavolga WN (1956) Visual, chemical and sound stimuli in sex-discriminatory behavior in the gobiid fish Bathygobius soporator. Zoologica 41:49–64Google Scholar
  46. Tavolga WN (1958) Underwater sounds produced by males of the blenniid fish, Chasmodes bosquianus. Ecology 39:759–760Google Scholar
  47. Urik RJ (1983) Principles of underwater sound. Peninsula Publishing, Los AltosGoogle Scholar
  48. Waser PM, Brown CH (1986) Habitat acoustics and primate communication. Am J Primatol 10:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waser PM, Waser MS (1977) Experimental studies of primate vocalization: specializations for long distance propagation. Z Tierpsychol 43:239–263Google Scholar
  50. Watkins WA (1967) The harmonic interval: fact or artifact in spectral analysis of pulse trains. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine bio-acoustics, vol II. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 15–43Google Scholar
  51. Whang A, Janssen J (1994) Sound production through the substrate during reproduction in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Cottidae). Environ Biol Fishes 40:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Quellet H (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–278Google Scholar
  53. Winn HE (1972) Acoustic discrimination by the toadfish with comments on signal systems. In: Winn HE, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals (current perspectives in research, vol 2). Plenum Press, New-York, pp 361–385Google Scholar
  54. Wysocki LE, Amoser S, Ladich F (2007) Diversity in ambient noise in European freshwater habitats: noise levels, spectral profiles, and impact on fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2559–2566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zakarauskas P (1986) Ambient noise in shallow water: a literature review. Can Acoust 14:3–17Google Scholar
  56. Zhang G, Takemura A (1989) Acoustic behavior of brown goby Bathygobius fuscus. Bull Fac Fish Nagasaki University 66:21–30 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary and Functional Biology, Viale Usberti (Campus)University of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations