Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 195, Issue 10, pp 923–934 | Cite as

Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats

  • Jedediah Tressler
  • Michael S. Smotherman
Original Paper

Abstract

Background noise evokes a similar suite of adaptations in the acoustic structure of communication calls across a diverse range of vertebrates. Echolocating bats may have evolved specialized vocal strategies for echolocating in noise, but also seem to exhibit generic vertebrate responses such as the ubiquitous Lombard response. We wondered how bats balance generic and echolocation-specific vocal responses to noise. To address this question, we first characterized the vocal responses of flying free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) to broadband noises varying in amplitude. Secondly, we measured the bats’ responses to band-limited noises that varied in the extent of overlap with their echolocation pulse bandwidth. We hypothesized that the bats’ generic responses to noise would be graded proportionally with noise amplitude, total bandwidth and frequency content, and consequently that more selective responses to band-limited noise such as the jamming avoidance response could be explained by a linear decomposition of the response to broadband noise. Instead, the results showed that both the nature and the magnitude of the vocal responses varied with the acoustic structure of the outgoing pulse as well as non-linearly with noise parameters. We conclude that free-tailed bats utilize separate generic and specialized vocal responses to noise in a context-dependent fashion.

Keywords

Echolocation Vocalization Noise Lombard response Vocal plasticity Jamming avoidance response 

Abbreviations

JAR

Jamming avoidance response

FM

Frequency-modulated

CF

Constant-frequency

Fstart

Start frequency of the pulse

Fend

End frequency of the pulse

Fpeak

Frequency of the part of the pulse with greatest amplitude

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Clint Netherland and the Texas A&M University Athletic Department for access to the bats of Kyle Field. We thank the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for the collection permits. We thank Kristin Denton for her most excellent animal care and help with running the experiments, Dr. Kirsten Bohn for help with statistics, and Christine Schwartz, Jenna Jarvis, Dr. Bohn, and Dr. George Pollak for many informative discussions. All husbandry and experimental procedures were in accordance with NIH guidelines for experiments involving vertebrate animals and were approved by the local IACUC. The research was supported by Texas A&M University and NIH Grant DC007962 to M.S. Smotherman

References

  1. Bates ME, Stamper SA, Simmons JA (2008) Jamming avoidance response of big brown bats in target detection. J Exp Biol 211:106–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brumm H (2006) Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A 192:1279–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brumm H, Slabbekoom H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brumm H, Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brumm H, Voss K, Köllmer I, Todt D (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol 207:443–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corne S, Bshouty Z (2005) Basic principles of control of breathing. Respir Care Clin N Am 11:147–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cynx J, Von Rad U (2001) Immediate and transitory effects of delayed auditory feedback on bird song production. Anim Behav 62:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Lmpe HM, Langmore NE, Holland J (1988) Quiet song in birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 9:89–105Google Scholar
  9. Egnor SE, Hauser MD (2006) Noise-induced vocal modulation in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Am J Primatol 68:1183–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egnor SE, Wickelgren JG, Hauser MD (2007) Tracking silence: adjusting vocal production to avoid acoustic interference. J Comp Physiol A 193:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foote AD, Osborne RW, Hoelzel AR (2004) Whale-call response to masking boat noise. Nature 428:910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillam EH, McCracken GF (2007) Variability in the echolocation of Tadarida brasiliensis: effects of geography and local acoustic environment. Anim Behav 74:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillam EH, Ulanovsky N, McCracken GF (2007) Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar. Proc Biol Sci 274:651–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habersetzer J (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the bat Rhinopoma hardwickei, a field study. J Comp Physiol A 144:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiryu S, Hagino T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2007) Echo-intensity compensation in echolocating bats (Pipistrellus abramus) during flight measured by a telemetry microphone. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1749–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt MM, Noren DP (2009) Speaking up: Killer whales (Orcinus orca) increase their call amplitude in response to vessel noise. J Acoust Soc Am 125:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibanez C, Juste J, Lopez-Wilchis R, Nunez-Garduno A (2004) Habitat variation and jamming avoidance in echolocation calls of the sac-winged bat (Balantiopteryx Plicata). J Mammal 85:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones G (1999) Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats. J Exp Biol 202:3359–3367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jurgens U (2009) The neural control of vocalization in mammals: a review. J Voice 23:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jürgens U (2002) Neural pathways underlying vocal control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:235–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jurgens U, Hage SR (2007) On the role of the reticular formation in vocal pattern generation. Behav Brain Res 182:308–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kobler JB, Wilson BS, Henson OW Jr, Bishop AL (1985) Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats. Hear Res 20:99–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lane H, Tranel B (1971) The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hearing Sci 14:677–709Google Scholar
  24. Leonard ML, Horn AG (2005) Ambient noise and the design of begging signals. Proc R Soc B 272:651–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lombard E (1911) Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Ann Mal Oreille Larynx 37:101–119Google Scholar
  26. Lopez PT, Narins PM, Lewis ER, Moore SW (1988) Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris. Anim Behav 36:1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loren CA, Colcord RD, Rastatter MP (1986) Effects of auditory masking by white noise on variability of fundamental frequency during highly similar productions of spontaneous speech. Percept Mot Skills 63:1203–1206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. MacLarnon AM, Hewitt GP (1999) The evolution of human speech: the role of enhanced breathing control. Am J Phys Anthropol 109:341–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manabe K, Sadr EI, Dooling RJ (1998) Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard effect. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1190–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson B (2000) Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. Anim Behav 59:57–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nonaka S, Takahashi R, Enomoto K, Katada A, Unno T (1997) Lombard reflex during PAG-induced vocalization in decerebrate cats. Neurosci Res 29:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penna M, Pottstock H, Velasquez N (2005) Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest. Anim Behav 70:639–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD (1986) Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hearing Sci 29:434–446Google Scholar
  34. Pollak GK, Marsh DS, Bodenhamer R, Souther A (1978) A single-unit analysis of inferior colliculus in unanesthetized bats: response patterns and spike-count functions generated by constant-frequency and frequency-modulated sounds. J Neurophysiol 41:677–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Potash LM (1972) Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Psychonomic Sci 26:252–254Google Scholar
  36. Pytte CL, Rusch KM, Ficken MS (2003) Regulation of vocal amplitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae. Anim Behav 66:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ratcliffe JM, ter Hofstede HM, Avila-Flores R, Fenton MB, McCracken GF, Biscardi S, Blasko J, Gillam E, Orprecio J, Spanjer G (2004) Conspecifics influence call design in the Brazilian free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis. Can J Zool 82:966–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scheifele PM, Andrew S, Cooper RA, Darre M, Musiek FE, Max L (2005) Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga. J Acoust Soc Am 117:1486–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt U, Joermann G (1986) The influence of acoustical interferences on echolocation in bats. Mammalia 50:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schnitzler H-U, Kalko EKV (2001) Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51:557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schulz GM, Varga M, Jeffires K, Ludlow CL, Braun AR (2005) Functional neuroanatomy of human vocalization: an H215O PET study. Cereb Cortex 15:1835–1847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz J, Wells KD (1983) An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Anim Behav 31:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz C, Tressler J, Keller H, Vanzant M, Ezell S, Smotherman M (2007) The tiny difference between foraging and communication buzzes uttered by the Mexican free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis. J Comp Physiol A 193:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simmons JA, Lavender WA, Lavender BA, Childs JE, Hulebak K, Rigden MR, Sherman J, Woolman B, O’Farrell MJ (1978) Echolocation by free-tailed bats (Tadarida). J Comp Physiol A 125:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinnot JM, Stebbins WC, Moody DB (1975) Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J Acoust Soc Am 58:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smotherman MS (2007) Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations. Behav Brain Res 182:315–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Surlykke A, Moss CF (2000) Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2419–2429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ulanovsky N, Moss CF (2007) Hippocampal cellular and network activity in freely moving echolocating bats. Nat Neurosci 10:224–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ulanovsky N, Fenton MB, Tsoar A, Korine C (2004) Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats. Proc Biol Sci 271:1467–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Summers W, Pisoni DB, Bernacki RH, Pedlow RI, Stokes MA (1988) Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 84:917–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations