Controlling a system with redundant degrees of freedom. I. Torque distribution in still standing stick insects

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The question is investigated as to how a stick insect solves the task of distributing its body weight onto its six legs, i.e., how are the torques coordinated that are produced by the 18 joints (3 per leg). Three-dimensional force measurements of ground reaction forces have been used to calculate the torques developed by each of the 18 joints. Torques were found to change considerably although the body and the legs of the animal did not move. This result implies a tight cooperation between the 18 joint controllers. Indeed, in each individual experiment, strong correlations could be observed between specific pairs of joints. However, in spite of thorough analysis, no general correlation rules between torques could be detected. The only common attribute found for all experiments was that high absolute torques observed at the beginning of the experiment tend to converge to some minimum over time. Thus, the insects tend to decrease the torques while standing still, but do not use fixed rules. Rather they appear to exploit their extra degrees of freedom and produce time courses that can strongly vary between experiments. Possible mechanisms underlying this behaviour are discussed in a companion paper [Lévy and Cruse (2008) Controlling a system with redundant degrees of freedom: ii. solution of the force distribution problem without a body model, submitted].

Keywords

Stick insects Standing Force distribution Torque distribution Redundant degree of freedom 

Abbreviations

DoFs

Degrees of freedom

mN

Millinewton

mN mm

Millinewton millimeter

s

Second

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the DFG grant no. Cr 58/11- 1,2 and by the Center of Excellence “Cognitive Interaction Technology” no. 277.

References

  1. Bartling C, Schmitz J (2000) Reaction to disturbances of a walking leg during stance. J Exp Biol 203(7):1211–1223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bässler U (1985) Proprioceptive control of stick insect walking. In: Gewecke, Wendler (eds) Insect locomotion. Paul Parey, pp 43–48Google Scholar
  3. Beer R, Quinn R, Chiel H, Ritzmann R (1997) Biologically inspired approaches to robotics: what can we learn from insects? Commun ACM 40(3):30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein N (1967) the co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns M (1973) The control of walking in orthoptera. i. Leg movements during normal walking. J Exp Biol 58(1):45–58Google Scholar
  6. Cheng F, Orin D (1990) Efficient algorithm for optimal force distribution—the compact-dual lp method. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 6(2):178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruse H (1976) The function of the legs in the free walking stick insect, Carausius morosus. J Comp Physiol 112(2):235–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cruse H (1979) A new model describing the coordination pattern of the leg of a walking stick insect. Biol Cybern 32(2):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruse H (1981) Is the position of the femur-tibia joint under feedback control in the walking stick insect? i. Force measurements. J Exp Biol 92(1):87–95Google Scholar
  10. Cruse H (1985a) The influence of load, position and velocity on the control of leg movement of a walking insect. In: Gewecke, Wendler (eds) Insect locomotion. Paul Parey, pp 19–26Google Scholar
  11. Cruse H (1985b) Which parameters control the leg movement of a walking insect? ii. The start of the swing phase. J Exp Biol 116(1):343–362Google Scholar
  12. Cruse H (1990) What mechanisms coordinate leg movement in walking arthropods? Trends Neurosci 13(1):15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruse H, Bartling C (1995) Movement of joint angles in the legs of a walking insect, Carausius morosus. J Insect Physiol 41(9):761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cruse H, Knauth A (1989) Coupling mechanisms between the contralateral legs of a walking insect (Carausius morosus). J Exp Biol 144(1):199–213Google Scholar
  15. Cruse H, Pflüger H (1981) Is the position of the femur-tibia joint under feedback control in the walking stick insect? ii. Electrophysiological recordings. J Exp Biol 92(1):97–107Google Scholar
  16. Cruse H, Schmitz J (1983) The control system of the femur-tibia joint in the standing leg of a walking stick insect Carausius morosus. J Exp Biol 102(1):175–185Google Scholar
  17. Cruse H, Schwarze W (1988) Mechanisms of coupling between the ipsilateral legs of a walking insect (Carausius morosus). J Exp Biol 138(1):455–469Google Scholar
  18. Dean J (1989) Leg coordination in the stick insect Carausius morosus: effect of cutting thoracic connectives. J Exp Biol 145(1):103–131Google Scholar
  19. Dean J (1991) Effects of load on leg movements and step coordination of the stick insect Carausius morosus. J Exp Biol 156(1):449–472Google Scholar
  20. Delcomyn F (1971) The locomotion of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. J Exp Biol 54:443–452Google Scholar
  21. Delcomyn F (1985) Sense organs and the pattern of motor activity during walking in the american cockroach. In: Gewecke, Wendler (eds) Insect locomotion, Paul Parey, pp 87–96Google Scholar
  22. Espenschied K, Quinn R, Chiel H, Beer H (1996) Biologically based distributed control and local reflexes improve rough terrain locomotion in a hexapod robot. Rob Auton Syst 18:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans M (1977) Locomotion in the coleoptera adephaga, especially carabidae. J Zool 181:189–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franklin R (1985) The locomotion of hexapods on rough ground. In: Gewecke, Wendler (eds) Insect locomotion. Paul Parey, pp 69–78Google Scholar
  25. Full R, Tu M (1990) Mechanics of six-legged runners. J Exp Biol 148:129–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Full R, Tu M (1991) Mechanics of a rapid running insect: two-, four- and six-legged locomotion. J Exp Biol 156:215–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Full R, Blickhan R, Ting L (1991) Leg design in hexapedal runners. J Exp Biol 156:369–390Google Scholar
  28. Full R, Yamauchi A, Jindrich D (1995) Maximum single leg force production: cockroaches righting and running on photoelastic gelatin. J Exp Biol 198:2441–2452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldfarb D, Idnani A (1983) A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs. Math Program 27(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldman D, Chen T, Dudek D, Full R (2006) Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template. J Exp Biol 209:2990–3000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham D (1972) A behavioural analysis of the temporal organization of walking movements in the first instar and adult stick insect. J Comp Physiol 81(1):23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris J, Ghirardella H (1980) The forces exerted on the substrate by walking and stationary crickets. J Exp Biol 85:263–279Google Scholar
  33. Hughes G (1952) The coordination of insect movement. i. The walking movements of insects. J Exp Biol 29:267–284Google Scholar
  34. Jander J (1985) Mechanical stability of stick insects when walking around curves. In: Gewecke, Wendler (eds) insect locomotion, Paul Parey, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  35. Jindrich D, Full R (1999) Many legged maneuverability: dynamics of turning in hexapods. J Exp Biol 202:1603–1623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jindrich D, Full R (2002) Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion. J Exp Biol 205:2803–2823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Klein C, Kittivatcharapong S (1990) Optimal force distribution for the legs of a walking machine with friction cone constraints. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 6(1):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kozacik J (1981) Stepping patterns in the cockroach Periplaneta americana. J Exp Biol 90:357–360Google Scholar
  39. Kram R, Wong B, Full R (1997) Three dimensional kinematics and limb kinetic energy of running cockroaches. J Exp Biol 200:1919–1929PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lafosse R (1989) Proposal for a generalized canonical analysis. Multiway Data Anal 269–276Google Scholar
  41. Lafosse R, TenBerge J (2005) A simultaneous concor algorithm for the analysis of two portioned matrices. Comput Stat Data Anal 50(10):2529–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lévy J, Cruse H (2008) Controling a system with redundant degrees of freedom: ii. Solution of the force distribution problem without a body model (in press)Google Scholar
  43. Manly B (2004) multivariate statistical methods. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Nahon M, Angeles J (1992) Real-time force optimization in parallel kinematic chains under inequality constraints. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 8(4):439–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakamura Y, Nagai K, Yoshikawa T (1987) Mechanics of coordinative manipulation by multiple robotic mechanism. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 4:991–998Google Scholar
  46. Rao C, Toutenburg H, Shalabh, Heuman C (2007) Linear models and generalizations. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider A, Cruse H, Schmitz J (2008) Winching up heavy loads with a compliant arm: a new local joint controller. Biol Cybern (in press)Google Scholar
  48. Spong M, Hutchinson S, Vidyasagar M (2006) Robot modeling and control. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Ting L, Blickhan R, Full R (1994) Dynamic and static stability in hexapedal runners. J Exp Biol 1997:251–269Google Scholar
  50. Zollikofer C (1994) Stepping patterns in ants. J Exp Biol 192:95–127PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Cybernetics and Theoretical BiologyUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations