Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 193, Issue 9, pp 955–961 | Cite as

Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for aliphatic aldehydes as a function of stimulus concentration

  • Matthias Laska
  • Dipa Joshi
  • Gordon M. Shepherd
Original Paper


Using an operant conditioning paradigm, we tested the ability of CD-1 mice to discriminate between members of a homologous series of aliphatic aldehydes presented at four different concentrations. We found that the mice were clearly capable of discriminating between all odorant pairs when stimuli were presented at concentrations of 1, 0.01, and 0.001 ppm (corresponding to four, two, and one log unit above the highest individual detection threshold) with no significant difference in performance between these concentrations. In contrast, the animals generally failed to discriminate above chance level when stimuli were presented at 0.0001 ppm (corresponding to the highest individual detection threshold) although stimuli were clearly detectable. Further, we found a significant negative correlation between discrimination performance and structural similarity of odorants in terms of differences in carbon chain length. These findings suggest that an increase in stimulus concentration of only one log unit above detection threshold appears to be sufficient for recruitment of additional subpopulations of odorant receptors to allow for qualitative recognition of aliphatic aldehydes.


Olfactory discrimination Aliphatic aldehydes Stimulus concentration CD-1 mice 



GMS is supported by NIH grant (5 R01 DC00086-38) and the Human Brain Project. The experiments reported here comply with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health Publication no. 86-23, revised 1985) and were performed according to a protocol approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.


  1. Abraham NM, Spors H, Carleton A, Margrie TW, Kuner T, Schaefer AT (2004) Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron 44:865–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodyak N, Slotnick B (1999) Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory. Chem Senses 24:637–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleland TA, Narla VA (2003) Intensity modulation of olfactory acuity. Behav Neurosci 117:1434–1440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doty RL, Laing DG (2003) Psychophysical measurement of human olfactory function, including odorant mixture assessment. In: Doty RL (ed) Handbook of olfaction and gustation, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 203–228Google Scholar
  5. Fine-Levy JB, Derby CD (1991) Effects of stimulus intensity and quality on discrimination of odorant mixtures by spiny lobsters in an associative learing paradigm. Physiol Behav 49:1163–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Firestein S, Shepherd GM, Werblin FS (1990) Time course of the membrane current underlying sensory transduction in salamander olfactory receptor neurones. J Physiol 430:135–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fried HU, Fuss SH, Korsching SI (2002) Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3222–3227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glusman G, Yanai I, Rubin I, Lancet D (2001) The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res 11:685–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfrey PA, Malnic B, Buck LB (2004) The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2156–2161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grosmaitre X, Vassalli A, Mombaerts P, Shepherd GM, Ma M (2006) Odorant responses of olfactory sensory neurons expressing the odorant receptor MOR23: a patch clamp analysis in gene-targeted mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1970–1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross-Isseroff R, Lancet D (1988) Concentration-dependent changes of perceived odor quality. Chem Senses 13:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hudson R, Arriola A, Martinez-Gomez M, Distel H (2006) Effect of air pollution on olfactory function in residents of Mexico City. Chem Senses 31:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson BA, Leon M (2000a) Odorant molecular length: one aspect of the olfactory code. J Comp Neurol 426:330–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson BA, Leon M (2000b) Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration. J Comp Neurol 422:496–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson BA, Farahbod H, Saber S, Leon M (2005) Effects of functional group position on spatial representations of aliphatic odorants in the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 483:192–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joshi D, Völkl M, Shepherd GM, Laska M (2006) Olfactory sensitivity for enantiomers and their racemic mixtures—a comparative study in CD-1 mice and spider monkeys. Chem Senses 31:655–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knudsen JT, Tollsten L, Bergström LG (1993) Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krautwurst D, Yau KW, Reed RR (1998) Identification of ligands for olfactory receptors by functional expression of a receptor library. Cell 95:917–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laing DG, Legha PK, Jinks AL, Hutchinson I (2003) Relationship between molecular structure, concentration and odor qualities of oxygenated aliphatic molecules. Chem Senses 28:57–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lancet D, Sadovsky E, Seidemann E (1993) Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3715–3719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laska M, Shepherd GM (2007) Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers. Neuroscience 144:295–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laska M, Teubner P (1999) Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes. Chem Senses 24:263–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laska M, Galizia CG, Giurfa M, Menzel R (1999a) Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure–activity relationships in honeybees. Chem Senses 24:429–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laska M, Trolp S, Teubner P (1999b) Odor structure–activity relationships compared in human and nonhuman primates. Behav Neurosci 113:998–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laska M, Wieser A, Hernandez Salazar LT (2005) Olfactory responsiveness to two odorous steroids in three species of nonhuman primates. Chem Senses 30:505–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laska M, Joshi D, Shepherd GM (2006) Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in CD-1 mice. Behav Brain Res 167:349–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leon M, Johnson BA (2003) Olfactory coding in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Brain Res Rev 42:23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McBride K, Slotnick B (2006) Discrimination between the enantiomers of carvone and those of terpinen-4-ol in normal rats and those with lesions of the olfactory bulbs. J Neurosci 26:9892–9901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuhaus W (1957) Wahrnehmungsschwelle und Erkennungsschwelle beim Riechen des Hundes im Vergleich zu den Riechwahrnehmungen des Menschen. Z Vergl Physiol 39:624–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelz C, Gerber B, Menzel R (1997) Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. J Exp Biol 200:837–847PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson HM, Wanner KW (2006) The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee Apis mellifera: expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. Genome Res 16:1395–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Röck F, Mueller S, Weimar U, Rammensee HG, Overath P (2006) Comparative analysis of volatile constituents from mice and their urine. J Chem Ecol 32:1333–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rouquier S, Blancher A, Giorgi D (2000) The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2870–2874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott JW, Acevedo HP, Sherrill L (2006) Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram. Chem Senses 31:581–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stuck BA, Frey S, Freiburg C, Hörmann K, Zahnert T, Hummel T (2006) Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1367–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson DA, Stevenson RJ (2006) The relationship between stimulus intensity and perceptual quality. In: Wilson DA, Stevenson RJ (eds) Learning to smell. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 64–75Google Scholar
  37. Wright GA, Smith BH (2004) Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Chem Senses 29:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu F, Liu N, Kida I, Rothman DL, Hyder F, Shepherd GM (2003) Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11029–11034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Laska
    • 1
  • Dipa Joshi
    • 2
  • Gordon M. Shepherd
    • 2
  1. 1.IFM BiologyLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeurobiologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations