Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 192, Issue 10, pp 1125–1131 | Cite as

Desert ants: is active locomotion a prerequisite for path integration?

Original Paper

Abstract

Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis have been shown to be able to employ two mechanisms of distance estimation: exploiting both optic flow and proprioceptive information. This study aims at understanding possible interactions between the two possibly redundant mechanisms of distance estimation. We ask whether in Cataglyphis the obviously minor contribution of optic flow would increase or even take over completely if the ants were deprived of reliable proprioceptive information. In various experimental paradigms ants were subjected to passive horizontal displacements during which they perceived optic flow, but were prohibited from active locomotion. The results show that in desert ants active locomotion is essential for providing the ants’ odometer and hence its path integrator with the necessary information.

Keywords

Cataglyphis fortis Locomotion Path integration Optic flow Proprioception 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrew Martin for help in conducting the experiments. The research was funded by the Volkswagen-Stiftung (1/78 580) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (3100-61844) both to R.W.. The experiments performed in this study comply with the “Principles of animal care”, publication No. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institute of Health and also with the laws of Tunisia, where the experiments were performed.

References

  1. Duelli P (1976) Distanzdressuren von getragenen Ameisen (Cataglyphis bicolor Fabr.). Rev Suisse Zool 83:413–418Google Scholar
  2. Egelhaaf M, Warzecha AK (1999) Encoding motion in real time by the fly visual system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:454–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Esch HE, Burns JE (1995) Honeybees use optic flow to measure the distance of a food source. Naturwiss 82(1):38–40Google Scholar
  4. Fourcassie V, Dahbi A, Cerdá X (2000) Orientation and navigation during adult transport between nests in the ant Cataglyphis iberica. Naturwissenschaften 87:355–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC (1987) Multiple Comparisons Procedures. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2003) A stingless bee (Melipona sminigra) uses optic flow to estimate flight distances. J Comp Physiol A 189:761–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kern R, Petereit C, Egelhaaf M (2001) Neural processing of naturalistic optic flow. J Neurosci 21:1–5Google Scholar
  8. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ronacher B, Wehner R (1995) Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances travelled. J Comp Physiol A 177:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sommer S, Wehner R (2005) Vector navigation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis: celestial compass cues are essential for the proper use of distance information. Naturwissenschaften 92:468–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Srinivasan MV, Zhang S, Altwein M, Tautz J (2000) Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the “odometer”. Science 287:851–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tautz J, Zhang S, Spaethe J, Brockmann A, Si A, Srinivasan MV (2004) Honeybee odometry: performance in varying natural terrain. PLoS Biol 2(7):0915–0923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ugolini A (1987) Visual information acquired during displacement and initial orientation in Polistes gallicus (L.) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) Anim Behav 35:590–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wehner (1982) Himmelsnavigation bei Insekten. Neurophysiologie und Verhalten. Neujahrsbl Naturforsch Ges Zürich 184:1–132Google Scholar
  15. Wehner R (2003) How miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A189:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (2003) Path integration in insects. In: Jeffery KJ (ed) The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–30Google Scholar
  17. Wittlinger M, Wehner R, Wolf H (2006) The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps. Science (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Wohlgemuth S, Ronacher B, Wehner R (2001) Ant odometry in the third dimension. Nature 411:795–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wohlgemuth S, Ronacher B, Wehner R (2002) Distance estimation in the third dimension in desert ants. J Comp Physiol A 188:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Zoology/NeurobiologyUniversity of ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations