Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 189, Issue 6, pp 411–418 | Cite as

Visual cues used by ball-rolling dung beetles for orientation

  • Marcus Byrne
  • Marie Dacke
  • Peter Nordström
  • Clarke Scholtz
  • Eric Warrant
Original Paper

Abstract

Ball rolling by dung beetles is considered to be a derived behaviour that evolved under pressure for space, and from competitors at the dung pat. Straight-line orientation away from the pat using a celestial cue should be the most successful rolling strategy to move dung to an unknown burial site. We tested this hypothesis in the field and the laboratory by presenting five species of ball-rolling beetles with different orientation tasks, involving reaction to obstacles as well as to reflected sunlight and artificial light sources. Beetles were found to consistently orientate along a chosen route, usually in the direction of the sun. Beetles rolling dung balls successfully negotiated barriers and returned to the original path as did beetles falling from ramps, or rotated about a fixed point while rolling a ball. The sun was found to be the main orientation cue, which could be substituted by reflected or artificial light. However, beetles reoriented themselves less accurately in response to lights in the laboratory, than they did to the reflected sun in the field. It is probable that phototactic orientation using the sun, which is widespread amongst arthropods, has been incorporated in the straight-line foraging behaviour that has evolved in ball-rolling dung beetles.

Keywords

Celestial cue Foraging Scarabaeidae Scarabaeinae Visual orientation 

References

  1. Bartholomew GA, Heinrich B (1978) Endothermy in African dung beetles during flight, ball making and ball rolling. J Exp Biol 73:65–83Google Scholar
  2. Birukow G (1953) Photogeomenotaxis bei Geotrupes silvaticus Panz. Naturwissenschaften 2Google Scholar
  3. Bernon G (1981) Species abundance and diversity of the Coleoptera component of a South African cow dung community, and associated insect predators. PhD thesis, University of Bowling Green, OhioGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandon SGF (1985) Man, myth and magic; scarabs. In: R. Cavendish (ed) The illustrated encyclopaedia of mythology, religion and the unknown. Marshall Cavendish, New York, pp 2488–2489Google Scholar
  5. Cambefort Y (1991) From saprophagy to coprophagy. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambefort Y, Hanski I (1991) Dung beetle population biology. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Campan R (1997) Tactic components in orientation. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  8. Collett M, Collett TS (2000a) How do insects use path integration for their navigation? Biol Cybern 83:245–259Google Scholar
  9. Collett TS, Collett M (2000b) Path integration in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:757–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraenkel GS, Gunn KL (1961) The orientation of animals: kineses, taxas and compass reactions. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Frantsevich L, Govardovski V, Gribakin F, Nikolajev G, Pichka V, Polansky A, Shevchenko V, Zolotov V (1977) Astro-orientation in Lethrus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). J Comp Physiol 121:253–271Google Scholar
  12. Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  13. Geisler M (1961) Untersuchungen zur Tagesperiodik des Mistkäfers Geotrupes silvaticus Panz. Z Tierpsychol 18:389–420Google Scholar
  14. Heinrich B, Bartholomew GA (1979) Roles of endothermy and size in inter- and intraspecific competition for elephant dung in an African dung beetle, Scarabaeus laevistriatus. Physiol Zool 52:489–496Google Scholar
  15. Lehrer M (1996) Small scale navigation in the honeybee: active acquisition of visual information about the goal. J Exp Biol 199:253–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehrer M (1997) Honeybee's visual spatial orientation at the feeding site. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhauser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehrer M (1998) Looking all around: honeybees use different cues in different eye regions. J Exp Biol 201:3275–3292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthews EG (1963) Observations on the ball rolling behaviour of Canthon pilularius (L.) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Psyche 70:75–93Google Scholar
  19. Pardi L, Papi F (1953) Ricerche sull'orientamento durante il gorno in una popolazione del litorale tirrenico. Z Vergl Physiol 35:459–489Google Scholar
  20. Sato H, Imamori I (1987) Nesting behaviour in the subsocial African ball-roller Kheper platynotus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecol Entomol 12:415–425Google Scholar
  21. Srinivasan MV, Poteser M, Kral K (1999) Motion detection in insect orientation and navigation. Vision Res 39:2749–2766Google Scholar
  22. Tomkins JL, Simmons LW, Knell RJ, Norris K (1999) Correlates of ball size and rolling speed in the dung beetle Kheper nigroaeneus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J Zool 248:483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tribe GD (1975) Pheromone release by dung beetles (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) S Afr J Science 71:277–278Google Scholar
  24. Ugolini A, LaHart B, Castellini C, Bengnon A (1993) Celestial orientation and ultraviolet perception in Talitrus saltator. Ethol Ecol Evol 5:489–499Google Scholar
  25. Waterman TH (1989) Animal navigation. Scientific American Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Wehner R (1984) Astronavigation in Insects. Annu Rev Entomol 29:277–298Google Scholar
  27. Ybarrondo BA, Heinrich B (1996) Thermoregulation and response to competition in the African dung beetle Kheper nigroaeneus. Physiol Zool 69:35–48Google Scholar
  28. Zar JH (1996) Biostastical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Byrne
    • 1
  • Marie Dacke
    • 2
  • Peter Nordström
    • 2
  • Clarke Scholtz
    • 3
  • Eric Warrant
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecophysiological Studies Research Group, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Cell and Organism BiologyUniversity of LundLundSweden
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and EntomologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations