Advertisement

Journal of Classification

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 127–137 | Cite as

Some Relationships Between Cronbach’s Alpha and the Spearman-Brown Formula

  • Matthijs J. Warrens
Article

Abstract

Cronbach’s alpha is an estimate of the reliability of a test score if the items are essentially tau-equivalent. Several authors have derived results that provide alternative interpretations of alpha. These interpretations are also valid if essential tau-equivalency does not hold. For example, alpha is the mean of all split-half reliabilities if the test is split into two halves that are equal in size. This note presents several connections between Cronbach’s alpha and the Spearman-Brown formula. The results provide new interpretations of Cronbach’s alpha, the stepped down alpha, and standardized alpha, that are also valid in the case that essential tau-equivalency or parallel equivalency do not hold. The main result is that the stepped down alpha is a weighted average of the alphas of all subtests of a specific size, where the weights are the denominators of the subtest alphas. Thus, the stepped down alpha can be interpreted as an average subtest alpha. Furthermore, we may calculate the stepped down alpha without using the Spearman-Brown formula.

Keywords

Stepped up alpha Stepped down alpha Standardized alpha Reliability Coefficient alpha Psychometrics. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BROWN, W. (1910), “Some Experimental Results in the Correlation of Mental Abilities”, British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.Google Scholar
  2. CALLENDER, J.C., and OSBURN, H.G. (1977), “A Method for Maximizing Split-Half Reliability Coefficients”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 819–825.Google Scholar
  3. CORTINA, J.M. (1993), “What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.Google Scholar
  4. CRONBACH, L.J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests”, Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.Google Scholar
  5. FIELD, A. (2013). “Discovering Coefficients Using SPSS” (4th ed.), Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. FURR R.M., and BACHARACH, V.R. (2013), “Psychometrics. An Introduction” (2nd ed.), Los Angelers: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. GRAHAM, J.M. (2006), “Congeneric and (Essential) Tau-equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930–944.Google Scholar
  8. GRAYSON, D. (2004), “Some Myths and Legends in Quantitative Psychology”, Understanding Coefficients, 3, 101–134.Google Scholar
  9. GREEN, S.B., and HERSHBERGER, S.L. (2000), “Correlated Errors in True Score Models and Their Effect on Coefficient Alpha”, Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 251–270.Google Scholar
  10. GREEN, S.B., and YANG, Y. (2009), “Commentary on Coefficient Alpha: A Cautionary Tale”, Psychometrika, 74, 121–135.Google Scholar
  11. GUTTMAN, L. (1945), “A Basis for Analyzing Test-Retest Reliability”, Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.Google Scholar
  12. KRUYEN, P.M., EMONS, W.H.M., and SIJTSMA, K. (2012), “Test Length and Decision Quality in Personnel Selection: When Is Short Too Short?”, International Journal of Testing, 12, 321–344.Google Scholar
  13. KRUYEN, P.M., EMONS, W.H.M., and SIJTSMA, K. (2013), “On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review”, International Journal of Testing, 13, 223–248.Google Scholar
  14. LORD, F.M., and NOVICK, M.R. (1968), “Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores” (with contributions by A. Birnbaum), Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. MCDONALD, R.P. (1999), “Test Theory: A Unified Treatment”, Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. OSBURN, H.G. (2000), “Coefficient Alpha and Related Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343–355.Google Scholar
  17. RAJU, N.S. (1977), “A Generalization of Coefficient Alpha”, Psychometrika, 42, 549–565.Google Scholar
  18. REVELLE, W., and ZINBARG, R.E. (2009), “Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the GLB: Comments on Sijtsma”, Psychometrika, 74, 145–154.Google Scholar
  19. SHENG, Y., and SHENG, Z. (2012), “Is Coefficient Alpha Robust to Non-normal Data?”, Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–13.Google Scholar
  20. SHROUT, P.E., and FLEISS, J.L. (1979), “Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability”, Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.Google Scholar
  21. SIJTSMA, K. (2009), “On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha”, Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.Google Scholar
  22. SPEARMAN, C. (1910), “Correlation Calculated From Faulty Data”, British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.Google Scholar
  23. THORNDIKE, R.L. (ed.) (1971), “Educational Measurement”, Washington DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  24. WINER, B.L. (1971), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Classification Society of North America 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Psychology, Unit Methodology and StatisticsLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations