Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 409–414 | Cite as

A nail-biting election

  • Steven J. Brams
  • Peter C. Fishburn

Abstract.

In the first competitive election for President of the Social Choice and Welfare Society, the (official) approval-voting winner differed from the (hypothetical) Borda count winner, who was also the Condorcet winner. But because the election was essentially a toss-up, it is impossible to say who should have won. The election for Council was more true to form of other professional-society elections, with the winners identical, and even their rankings almost duplicative, under both voting systems.

Keywords

Social Choice Condorcet Winner Borda Count Competitive Election Welfare Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Brams
    • 1
  • Peter C. Fishburn
    • 2
  1. 1. Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA (e-mail: steven.brams@nyu.edu)US
  2. 2. AT&T Labs – Research, 180 Park Avenue, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA (e-mail: fish@research.att.com)US

Personalised recommendations