Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 709–735 | Cite as

The probability of ties with scoring methods: Some results

  • Thierry Marchant


The main flaw of the Condorcet method is that a Condorcet winner does not always exist (when there is a top cycle). Moreover, in some cases, all candidates are contained in one cycle and, therefore, a society or committee using the Condorcet method risks to face a severe indeterminacy. An indeterminacy can also happen when using other methods: for example the Borda method, plurality voting or any scoring method; but the origin of the indeterminacy is completely different. It happens when all candidates are tied. We study the probability that all candidates are tied when using a scoring method. We show that it is equivalent to some random walk problems. Some analytical and numerical results show that, under the assumptions underlying our study, the probability is very small and decreases when the number of voters or candidates increases.


Random Walk Main Flaw Condorcet Winner Plurality Vote Method Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thierry Marchant
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium (

Personalised recommendations