Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 197–213 | Cite as

The weighted-egalitarian Shapley values

  • Takaaki Abe
  • Satoshi NakadaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a new class of allocation rules for cooperative games with transferable utility (TU-games), weighted-egalitarian Shapley values, where each rule in this class takes into account each player’s contributions and heterogeneity among players to determine each player’s allocation. We provide an axiomatic foundation for the rules with a given weight profile (i.e., exogenous weights) and the class of rules (i.e., endogenous weights). The axiomatization results illustrate the differences among our class of rules, the Shapley value, the egalitarian Shapley values, and the weighted Shapley values.

References

  1. Abe T, Nakada S (2017) Monotonic redistribution: reconciling performance-based allocation and weighted division. Int Game Theory Rev 19:175022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Béal S, Casajus A, Huettner F, Rémila E, Solal P (2016) Characterizations of weighted and equal division values. Theory Decis 80:649–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. van den Brink R, Funaki Y, Ju Y (2013) Reconciling marginalism with egalitarianism: consistency, monotonicity, and implementation of egalitarian Shapley values. Soc Choice Welf 40:693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casajus A (2010) Another characterization of the Owen value without the additivity axiom. Theory Decis 69:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casajus A (2011) Differential marginality, van den Brink fairness, and the Shapley value. Theory Decis 71:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casajus A (2014) The Shapley value without efficiency and additivity. Math Soc Sci 68:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casajus A (2015) Monotonic redistribution of performance-based allocations: a case for proportional taxation. Theor Econ 10:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casajus A (2016) Differentially monotonic redistribution of income. Econ Lett 141:112–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casajus A, Huettner F (2013) Null players, solidarity, and the egalitarian Shapley values. J Math Econ 49:58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casajus A, Huettner F (2014) Weakly monotonic solutions for cooperative games. J Econ Theory 154:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casajus A, Yokote K (2017a) Weak differential marginality and the Shapley value. J Econ Theory 167:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casajus A, Yokote K (2017b) Weak differential monotonicity, flat tax, and basic income. Econ Lett 151:100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chun Y (1988) The proportional solution for rights problems. Math Soc Sci 15:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chun Y (1989) A new axiomatization of the Shapley value. Games Econ Behav 1:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chun Y (1991) On the symmetric and weighted Shapley values. Int J Game Theory 20:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart S, Mas-Colell A (1989) Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica 57:589–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joosten R, Peters H, Thuijsman F (1994) Socially acceptable values for transferable utility games. Report M94-03, Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Joosten R (1996) Dynamics, equilibria and values. Dissertation, Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Joosten R (2016) More on linear-potential values and extending the ‘Shapley family’ for TU-games, presented in Stony Brook, see the conference website http://www.gtcenter.org/?page=Archive/2016/ConfTalks.html
  20. Kalai E, Samet D (1987) On weighted Shapley values. Int J Game Theory 16:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak A, Radzik T (1994) A solidarity value for n-person transferable utility games. Int J Game Theory 23:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowak A, Radzik T (1995) On axiomatizations of the weighted Shapley values. Games Econ Behav 8:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roth A (1979) Proportional solutions to the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47:775–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shapley L (1953a) Additive and non-additive set functions. PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Shapley L (1953b) A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the theory of games II (Annals of Mathematics Studies 28). Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317Google Scholar
  26. Shapley L, Shubik M (1969) On the core of an economic system with externalities. Am Econ Rev 59:678–684Google Scholar
  27. Young P (1985) Monotonic solutions of cooperative games. Int J Game Theory 14:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yokote K (2015) Weak addition invariance and axiomatization of the weighted Shapley value. Int J Game Theory 44:275–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EconomicsWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.School of Management, Department of Business EconomicsTokyo University of ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations