Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 65–96 | Cite as

Intertemporal pro-poorness

  • Florent Bresson
  • Jean-Yves Duclos
  • Flaviana PalmisanoEmail author
Original Paper
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

A long-lasting scientific and policy debate queries the impact of growth on distribution. A specific branch of the micro-oriented literature, known as ‘pro-poor growth’, seeks in particular to understand the impact of growth on poverty. Much of that literature supposes that the distributional impact should be measured in an anonymous fashion. The income dynamics and mobility impacts of growth are thus ignored. The paper extends this framework in two important manners. First, the paper uses an ‘intertemporal pro-poorness’ formulation that accounts separately for anonymous and mobility growth impacts. Second, the paper’s treatment of mobility encompasses both the benefit of “mobility as equalizer” and the variability cost of poverty transiency. Several decompositions are proposed to measure the importance of each of these impacts of growth on the pro-poorness of distributional changes. The framework is applied to panel data on 23 European countries drawn from the ‘European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions’ survey.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Philippe Van Kerm, Robert Zelli, two anonymous referees and the editor for helpful suggestions and comments. This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche of the French government through the program “Investissements d’avenir” ANR-10-LABX-14-01, as well as by the Fonds National de La Recherche Luxembourg, SSHRC, FRQSC and by the Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP), which is financed by the Government of Canada through the International Development Research Centre and the Canadian International Development Agency, and by the UK Department for International Department and the Australian Agency for International Development.

References

  1. Alkire S, Foster J (2011) Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. J Econ Inequal 9:289–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson A (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson A (2003) Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. J Econ Inequal 1:51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (1982) The comparison of multi-dimensioned distributions of economic status. Rev Econ Stud 49:183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargain O, Callan T, Doorley K, Keane C (2017) Changes in income distributions and the role of tax-benefit policy during the great recession: an international perspective. Fisc Stud 38:559–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bibi S, Duclos J-Y, Araar A (2014) Mobility, taxation and welfare. Soc Choice Welf 42:503–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosmans K, Decancq K, Ooghe E (2015) What do normative indices of multidimensional inequality really measure? J Public Econ 130:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bossert W, Chakravarty S, d’Ambrosio C (2012) Poverty and time. J Econ Inequal 10:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourguignon F (1999) Comment on multidimensioned approaches to welfare analysis. In: Maasoumi E, Silber J (eds) Handbook of income inequality measurement. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourguignon Fr (2011) Non-anonymous growth incidence curves, income mobility and social welfare dominance. J Econ Inequal 9:605–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bresson F, Duclos J-Y (2015) Intertemporal poverty comparisons. Soc Choice Welf 44:567–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Busetta A, Mendola D (2012) The importance of consecutive spells of poverty: a path-dependent index of longitudinal poverty. Rev Income Wealth 58:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callan T, Nolan B, Walsh J (2011) The economic crisis, public sector pay and the income distribution. In who loses in the downturn? Economic crisis, employment and income distribution. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calvo C, Dercon S (2009) Chronic poverty and all that: the measurement of poverty over time. In: Addison T, Hulme D, Kanbur R (eds) Poverty dynamics: interdisciplinary perspectives, chap. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 29–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canto O, Gradín C, del Rio C (2012) Measuring poverty accounting for time. Rev Income Wealth 58:330–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakravarty S (1983a) Ethically flexible measures of poverty. Can J Econ Revue Canadienne d’Économique 16:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chakravarty S (1983b) A new index of poverty. Math Soc Sci 6:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chakravarty S, Dutta B, Weymark J (1985) Ethical indices of income mobility. Soc Choice Welf 2:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Creedy J, Wilhelm M (2002) Income mobility, inequality and social welfare. Aust Econ Pap 41:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Decancq K, Ooghe E (2010) Has the world moved forward? A robust multidimensional evaluation. Econ Lett 107:266–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Decanq K, Lugo MA (2012) Inequality of wellbeing: a multidimensional approach. Economica 79:721–746Google Scholar
  22. Duclos J-Y (2009) What is “pro-poor"? Soc Choice Welf 32:37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dutta I, Pattanaik P, Xu Y (2003) On measuring deprivation and the standard of living in a multidimensional framework on the basis of aggregate data. Economica 70:197–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dutta I, Roope L, Zank H (2013) On intertemporal poverty measures: the role of affluence and want. Soc Choice Welf 41:741–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Essama-Nssah B (2005) A unified framework for pro-poor growth analysis. Econ Lett 89:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Essama-Nssah B, Lambert PJ (2009) Measuring pro-poorness: a unifying approach with new results. Rev Income Wealth 55:752–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fields GS (2008) Income mobility. In: Blume L, Durlauf S (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. Fields GS (2010) Does income mobility equalize longer-term incomes? New measures of an old concept. J Econ Inequal 8:409–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fields G, Ok E (1999) The measurement of income mobility: an introduction to the literature. In: Silber J (ed) Handbook of income inequality measurement, chap. 19. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 557–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fortin N, Lemieux T, Firpo S (2011) Decomposition methods in economics. In: Handbook of labor economics, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 1–102Google Scholar
  31. Foster JE (2009) A class of chronic poverty measures. In: Addison T, Hulme D, Kanbur R (eds) Poverty dynamics: interdisciplinary perspectives, chap. 3. Oxford University Press, Kanbur, pp 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foster J, Rothbaum J (2012) Mobility curves: using cutoffs to measure absolute mobility. Mimeo, George Washington University, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke E (1984) A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52:761–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Gottschalk P, Spolaore E (2002) On the evaluation of economic mobility. Rev Econ Stud 69:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grimm M (2007) Removing the anonymity asiom in assessing pro-poor growth. J Econ Inequal 5:179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoy M, Zheng B (2011) Measuring lifetime poverty. J Econ Theory 146:2544–2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Immervoll H, Peichl A, Tatsiramos K (2011) Who loses in the downturn: economic crisis, employment and income distribution. Emerald Group PublishingGoogle Scholar
  39. Jäntti M, Jenkins S (2015) Income mobility. In: Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, chap 10, vol 2. North Holland, New York, pp 807–935Google Scholar
  40. Jäntti M, Kanbur R, Nyyssölä M, Pirttilä J (2014) Poverty and welfare measurement on the basis of prospect theory. Rev Income Wealth 60:182–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins S, Van Kerm P (2011) Trends in individual income growth: measurement methods and British evidence. DP 5510, IZAGoogle Scholar
  42. Jenkins SP, Brandolini A, Micklewright J, Nolan B (2012) The great recession and the distribution of household income. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kakwani N, Pernia E (2000) What is pro-poor growth? Asian Dev Rev 18:1–16Google Scholar
  44. Kakwani N, Son H (2003) Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. Pak Dev Rev 42:417–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2003) Risk-adjusted measures of wage inequality and safety nets. Econ Bull 9:1–10Google Scholar
  46. Matsaganis M, Leventi C (2014) Distributive effects of the crisis and austerity in seven EU countries. ImPRovE Working Pape, 14/04Google Scholar
  47. OECD (2015) In it together: why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  48. Palmisano F, Peragine V (2015) The distributional incidence of growth: a social welfare approach. Rev Income Wealth 61:440–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Palmisano F, Van de gaer D (2016) History dependent growth incidence: a characterisation and an application to the economic crisis in Italy. Oxf Econ Pap 68:585–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ravallion M, Chen S (2003) Measuring pro-poor growth. Econ Lett 78:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rohde N, Tang K, Osberg L, Rao D (2017) Is it vulnerability or economic insecurity that matters for health? J Econ Behav Organ 134:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruiz-Castillo J (2004) The measurement of structural and exchange mobility. J Econ Inequal 2:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shorrocks A (2013) Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. J Econ Inequal 11:99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Son HH (2004) A note on pro-poor growth. Econ Lett 82:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Western B, Bloome D, Sosnaud B, Tach L (2012) Economic insecurity and social stratification. Annu Rev Sociol 38:341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zheng B (2012) Measuring chronic poverty: a gravitational approach. Working paper, University of Colorado DenverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florent Bresson
    • 1
  • Jean-Yves Duclos
    • 2
  • Flaviana Palmisano
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.CERDI (Université d’Auvergne and CNRS)Clermont-FerrandFrance
  2. 2.CIRPEE, Université Laval and FERDIQuebecCanada
  3. 3.University of Rome La SapienzaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations