Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 825–851 | Cite as

The development and happiness of very young children

  • Paul Anand
  • Laurence Roope
Original Paper

Abstract

The paper demonstrates how Sen’s (Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1985) alternative approach to welfare economics can be used to shed light on the wellbeing of very young children. More specifically, we estimate versions of the three key relations from his framework using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) Survey. Our primary models provide evidence that skills are related to involvement in cognate activities with a parent, indicating a behavioural relationship between capabilities and activities which is not explicit in Sen’s original set-up, but is key to the development and happiness of young children. A second set of models indicates that the daily activities of very young children are related to household income but that in some cases the association with parenting inputs is stronger. Thirdly, we report happiness regressions for the children which seem to suggest that shopping and reading are valued but that their distribution is limited in some cases—probably either by household income or parental education. Across the piece, we find that the number of siblings is negatively related to activity involvement with parents, as hypothesised by Becker, but positively related to everyday, motor and social skills. Combined with evidence from other studies, we conclude that the capability approach provides a useful framework for understanding the economics of wellbeing across the entire life course.

Keywords

Social Skill Welfare Economic Capability Approach Picture Book Order Probit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

355_2016_993_MOESM1_ESM.docx (84 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (docx 83 KB)

References

  1. Addabbo T, Di Tommaso ML (2011) Children’s capabilities and family characteristics in Italy: measuring imagination and play, children and the capability approach. In: Ballet J, Biggeri M, Comim F (eds) Children and the capability approach. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 222–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addabbo T, Di Tommaso ML, Maccagnan A (2014) Gender differences in Italian children’s capabilities. Fem Econ 20:90–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aizer A, Cunha F (2012) The production of child human capital: endowments, investments and fertility, NBER Working Paper No. 18429Google Scholar
  4. Alkire S, Foster J (2011) Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J Public Econ 95:476–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand P, Santos C, Smith R (2009) The measurement of capabilitiesch 16 in arguments for a better world, Festschrift for Amartya Sen, Basu, K and Kanbur. R. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand P, Krishnakumar J, Tran NB (2011) Measuring welfare: latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity. J Public Econ 95:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anand P, Gray A, Liberini F, Roope L, Smith R, Thomas R (2015) Wellbeing Over 50. J Econ Ageing 6:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barcellos SH, Carvalho L, Lleras-Muney A (2012) Child gender and parental investments in India: are boys and girls treated differently? (No. w17781). National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  9. Barr R, Hayne H (2003) It’s not what you know, it’s who you know: older siblings facilitate imitation during infancy. Int J Early Years Educ 11:7–21Google Scholar
  10. Becker G, Lewis H (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 81(2):S279–S288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertoni M (2015) Hungry today, unhappy tomorrow? Childhood hunger and subjective wellbeing later in life. J Health Econ 40:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biggeri M, Ballet J, Comin F (2010) The capability approach andresearch on children. In: Andresen O et al (eds) Children’s Wellbeing, vol 4. Springer, New York, pp 75–89Google Scholar
  13. Biggeri M, Libanora R, Mariani S, Menchini L (2006) Children conceptualising their capabilities: results of a the survey during the first children’s world congress on child labour. J Hum Dev 7:59–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carneiro P, Meghir C, Parey M (2013) Maternal education, home environments, and the development of children and adolescents. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(supplement s1):123–160Google Scholar
  15. Chevalier A, Marie O (2015) Economic uncertainty, parental selection, and children’s educational outcomes. The Lifecourse Centre Australia, Paper No 201506Google Scholar
  16. Conti G, Heckman JJ (2014) Economics of child well-being. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 363–401Google Scholar
  17. Cunha F, Heckman J (2008) Formulating. identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. J Hum Res 43:738–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cunha F, Heckman JJ (2009) Investing in our Young People. Rivista Int di Sci Soc:387–417Google Scholar
  19. Cunha F, Heckman J, Schennach S (2010) Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica 78:883–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Bono E, Francesconi M, Kelly Y, Sacker A (2014) Early maternal time investment and early child outcomes. IZA Discussion Papers, No 8608Google Scholar
  21. Di Tommaso ML (2007) Children capabilities: a structural equation model for India. J Soc Econ 36:436–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener E, Lucas R, Schimmack U, Helliwell J (2009) Well-being for public policy. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doyle O, Harmon C, Heckman J, Logue C, Moon S (2015) Early skill formation and the efficiency of parental investment: a randomized controlled trial of home visiting. Lifecourse Centre Discussion Paper, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  24. Duflo E (2012) Human values and the design of the fight against poverty. Tanner LecturesGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleurbaey M (2008) Fairness responsibility and welfare. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2012) The use of happiness research for public policy. Soc Choice Welf 38:659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frijters P, Haisken-DeNew JP, Shields MA (2004) Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. Am Econ Review 94:730–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green CM, Berkule SB, Dreyer BP, Fierman AH, Huberman HS, Klass PE, Tomopoulos S, Yin HS, Morrow LM, Mendelsohn AL (2009) Maternal literacy and associations between education and the cognitive home environment in low-income families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163:832–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman J (2006) Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312:1900–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahneman D, Wakker P, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 2:375–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luthar S (2003) The culture of affluence: psychological costs of material wealth. Child Dev 74:1581–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacDonald K, Parke R (1984) Bridging the gap: parent-child play interaction and peer interactive competence. Child Dev 55:1265–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McQuillin B, Sugden R (2012) Reconciling normative and behavioural economics. Soc Choice Welf 38:553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nielsen M (2006) Copying actions and copying outcomes: social learning through the second year. Dev Psychol 42:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Over H, Carpenter M (2012) Putting the social into social learning: explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children’s copying behaviour. J Comp Psychol 126:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phipps S (2002) The Well-being of Young Canadian Children International Perspective: a functionings approach. Rev Income Wealth 48:493–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pregibon D (1979) Data analytic methods for generalized linear models, Ph.D. dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  38. Puppe C (1995) Freedom of choice and rational decisions. Soc Choice and Welf 12:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schokkaert E (1999) M. Tout-le-monde est post-welfariste. Opinions sur la justice redistributive Revue Economique 50:811–831Google Scholar
  40. Sen A (1979) Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economics. Econ J 89:537–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen A (1985a) commodities and capabilities. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen A (1985b) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey Lectures 1984. J Philos 82:169–221Google Scholar
  43. Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) (2012) data for years 1984–2010. version 27.1, SOEP. doi: 10.5684/soep.v27.1
  44. Tukey JW (1949) One degree of freedom for non-additivity. Biometrics 5:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volkert J, Wüst K (2011) Early childhood, agency and capability deprivation–a quantitative analysis using German Socio-Economic Panel Data. Closing the capabilities gap. Renegotiating Social Justice for the Young, Barbara Budrich Esser, pp 179–198Google Scholar
  46. Wagner G, Frick J, Schupp J (2007) The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1):139–169Google Scholar
  47. White M, Dolan P (2009) Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychol Sci 20:1000–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitehurst G, Lonigan C (1998) Child development and emergent literacy. Child Develop 69:848–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.University of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.London School of EconomicsLondonUK
  4. 4.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations