Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 25–61 | Cite as

Subjective beliefs about the income distribution and preferences for redistribution

Original Paper

Abstract

We investigate whether beliefs about the income distribution are associated with political positions for or against redistribution. Using a novel elicitation method, we assess individuals’ beliefs about the shape of the income distribution in the United States. We find that respondents’ beliefs approximate the actual distribution on average. However they tend to overestimate the median income and underestimate the level of inequality. Surprisingly we find that beliefs about overall inequality, measured in terms of income dispersion, play only a marginal role in political positions as well as prospects of future wealth. Political preferences, however, are predicted by first, beliefs about the level of income of the poorest members of society, and second, a belief in an open society with equal opportunities for all. Support for redistribution is lower for people who give higher estimates of the income level of the poorest members of society and for people who perceive that opportunities for upward mobility are available.

References

  1. Alesina A, Angeletos G (2005) Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review 95(4):960–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Giuliano P (2009) Preferences for redistribution. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2005) Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6):897–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina A, Rodrik D (1994) Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics pp 465–490Google Scholar
  5. Andreoni J, Miller J (2002) Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica 70(2):737–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansolabehere S, Meredith M, Snowberg E (2014) Mecro-economic voting: Local information and micro-perceptions of the macro-economy. Economics & Politics 26(3):380–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson A (1970) On the measurement of inequality. Journal of economic theory 2(3):244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (1982) The comparison of multi-dimensioned distributions of economic status. The Review of Economic Studies 49(2):183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bénabou R, Ok E (2001) Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the poum hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):447–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2):699–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolton G, Ockenfels A (2000) Erc: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American economic review pp 166–193Google Scholar
  12. Braas-Garza P (2006) Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(3):306–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunner E, Ross S, Washington E (2011) Economics and policy preferences: Causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals. The Review of Economics and Statistics 93(3):Google Scholar
  14. Bureau of labor statistics (2010) Occupational outlook handbook. US Department of Labor, SpringGoogle Scholar
  15. Chakravarty SR (2009) Inequality, polarization and poverty. Springer,Google Scholar
  16. Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3):817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleave BL, Nikiforakis N, Slonim R (2013) Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? the case of social and risk preferences. Experimental Economics 16(3):372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corneo G, Grüner H (2002) Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 83(1):83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox J, Sadiraj V (2006) Direct tests of models of social preferences and a new model. Tech. Rep. 976027, SSRNGoogle Scholar
  20. Cruces G, Perez Truglia R, Tetaz M (2013) Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics 98:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Tella R, Galiani S, Schargrodsky E (2007) The formation of beliefs: evidence from the allocation of land titles to squatters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(1):209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engelmann D, Strobel M (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. The American Economic Review 94(4):857–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engelmann D, Strobel M (2007) Preferences over income distribution, experimental evidence. Public Finance Review 35(2):285–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3):817–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fillippin A, Checchi D (2004) An experimental study of the poum hypothesis. Research on economic inequality 11Google Scholar
  26. Fong C (2001) Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 82(2):225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fong C, Bowles S, Gintis H (2006) Strong reciprocity and the welfare state. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism 2:1439–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gigerenzer G (1991) How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond heuristics and biases. European review of social psychology 2(1):83–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A (2009) Growing up in a recession: Beliefs and the macroeconomy. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldstein DG, Rothschild D (2014) Lay understanding of probability distributions. Judgment and Decision Making 9(1):1–14Google Scholar
  31. Goldstein DG, Johnson E, Sharpe W (2008) Choosing outcomes versus choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3):440–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gottschalk P, Spolaore E (2002) On the evaluation of economic mobility. The Review of Economic Studies 69(1):191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrison GW, Lau MI, Elisabet Rutström E (2009) Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70(3):498–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harsanyi J (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The Journal of Political Economy pp 309–321Google Scholar
  35. Hirschman A, Rothschild M (1973) The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4):544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isaksson AS, Lindskog A (2009) Preferences for redistributiona country comparison of fairness judgements. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72(3):884–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karni E, Safra Z (2002) Individual sense of justice: a utility representation. Econometrica 70(1):263–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kitschelt H (1994) The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
  39. Kolm SC (1969) The optimal production of social justice. In: Margolis J, Guitton S (eds) Public economics. Macmillan, London, pp 145–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E (2015) How elastic are preferences for redistribution? evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review 105(4):1478–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Y, Johnson EJ, Zaval (2011) Local warming: Daily temperature deviation affects beliefs and concern about climate change. Psychological Science 22(4):454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magee L, Robb A, Burbidge J (1998) On the use of sampling weights when estimating regression models with survey data. Journal of Econometrics 84(2):251–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norton M, Ariely D (2011) Building a better ameerica one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Persson T, Tabellini G (2002) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT press,Google Scholar
  45. Piketty T (1995) Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3):551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piketty T (1996) Mobilité économique et attitudes politiques face à la redistribution. Tech. Rep. 9603, CEPREMAPGoogle Scholar
  47. Piketty T (2003) Attitudes vis-à-vis des inégalités de revenu en france: existerait-il un consensus. Comprendre 4:209–41Google Scholar
  48. Poole K, Rosenthal H (1991) Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science pp 228–278Google Scholar
  49. Przeworski A, Sprague J (1986) Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism. University of Chicago Press Chicago,Google Scholar
  50. Ravallion M, Lokshin M (2000) Who wants to redistribute?: The tunnel effect in 1990s russia. Journal of Public Economics 76(1):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University, MassGoogle Scholar
  52. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business. Economies, Societies and NationsGoogle Scholar
  53. Von Gaudecker HM, Van Soest A, Wengström E (2008) Selection and mode effects in risk preference elicitation experiments. Tech. rep, IZA Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  54. Weymark J (1981) Generalized gini inequality indices. Mathematical Social Sciences 1(4):409–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Microsoft ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations