Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 231–255 | Cite as

Do we value mobility?

  • Yoram Amiel
  • Michele Bernasconi
  • Frank Cowell
  • Valentino DardanoniEmail author
Article

Abstract

Is there a trade-off between people’s preference for income equality and income mobility? Testing for the existence of such a trade-off is difficult because mobility is a multifaceted concept. We analyse results from a questionnaire experiment based on simple precise concepts of income inequality and income mobility. We find no direct trade-off in preference between mobility and equality, but an indirect trade-off, applying when more income mobility can only be obtained at the expense of some income inequality. Mobility preference—but not equality preference—appears to be driven by personal experience of mobility.

Keywords

Income Inequality Marginal Distribution Income Equality Equality Preference Intergenerational Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Anat Alexandron, Latika Sharma and Yinfei Dong for research assistance. Michele Bernasconi gratefully acknowledges partial support from the Swiss & Global - Ca’ Foscari Foundation. We especially thank the reviewers and the editor for several comments.

References

  1. Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2005) Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J Public Econ 89:897–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Giuliano P (2011) Preferences for redistribution. In: Benhabib J, Jackson MO, Bisin A (eds) Handbook of social economics, vol 1A. North Holland, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina A, Giuliano P (2013) Family ties. NBER Working Paper No. 18966Google Scholar
  4. Amiel Y (1999) The subjective approach to the measurement of income inequality. In: Silber J (ed) Handbook on income inequality measurement. Kluwer, DewenterGoogle Scholar
  5. Amiel Y, Cowell FA (1992) Measurement of income inequality: experimental test by questionnaire. J Public Econ 47:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amiel Y, Cowell FA (1998) Distributional orderings and the transfer principle: a re-examination. Res Econ Inequal 8:195–215Google Scholar
  7. Amiel Y, Cowell FA (1999) Thinking about inequality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amiel Y, Cowell FA, Gaertner W (2009) To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethics. Soc Choice Welf 32:299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atkinson AB (1981) The measurement of economic mobility. In Essays in honour of Jan PenGoogle Scholar
  11. Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F (1982) The comparison of multidimensional distributions of economic status. Rev Econ Stud 49:183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartels L (2005) Homer gets a tax cut: inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspect Polit 3:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benabou R, Ok E (2001) Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Q J Econ 116:447–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernasconi M (2002) How should income be divided? Questionnaire evidence from the theory of impartial. J Econ 9:163–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bosmans K, Schokkaert E (2004) Social welfare, the veil of ignorance and purely individual risk: an empirical examination. Res Econ Inequal 11:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breen R, Luijkx R (2004) Social mobility in Europe between 1970 and 2000. In: Breen R (ed) Social mobility in Europe. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Camerer CF, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. J Risk Uncertain 19:7–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cappelen AW, Sorensen EO, Tungodden B (2010) Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. Eur Econ Rev 54:429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chakravarty SR, Dutta B, Weymark J (1985) Ethical indices of income mobility. Soc Choice Welf 2:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Checchi D, Ichino A, Rustichini A (1999) More equal but less mobile? J Public Econ 74:351–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conlisk J (1990) Monotone mobility matrices. J Math Sociol 15:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corak M (2013) Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. J Econ Perspect 27:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corneo G, Grüner H-P (2002) Individual preferences for political redistribution. J Public Econ 83:83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cowell FA (1985) Measures of distributional change: an axiomatic approach. Rev Econ Stud 52:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cowell FA, Flachaire E (2011) Measuring mobility. Public Economics Discussion Paper 8, STICERD, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AEGoogle Scholar
  26. D’Agostino M, Dardanoni V (2009) The measurement of rank mobility. J Econ Theory 144:1783–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dardanoni V (1993) Measuring social mobility. J Econ Theory 61:372–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dardanoni V, Fiorini M, Forcina A (2012) Stochastic monotonicity in intergenerational mobility tables. J Appl Econom 27:85–107Google Scholar
  29. Duncan O (1966) Methodological issues in the analysis of economic mobility. In: Smelser N, Lipset S (eds) Social structure and mobility in economic development. Aldine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Affairs 10:283–345Google Scholar
  31. Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH (1992) The constant flux. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326:535–538Google Scholar
  34. Fields GS, Ok EA (1996) The meaning and measurement of income mobility. J Econ Theory 71:349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fields GS, Ok EA (1999) The measurement of income mobility: an introduction to the literature. In: Silber J (ed) Handbook on income inequality measurement. Kluwer, DewenterGoogle Scholar
  36. Fong C (2001) Social preferences, self-interest and the demand for redistribution. J Public Econ 82:225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Formby JP, Smith WJ, Zheng B (2004) Mobility measurement, transition matrices and statistical inference. J Econom 120:181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaertner W, Schokkaert E (2012) Empirical social choice: questionnaire-experimental studies on distributive justice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Galor O, Moav O (2006) Das human kapital: a theory of the demise of the class structure. Rev Econ Stud 73:85–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Georgiadis A, Manning A (2012) Spend it like Beckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK. 1983–204. Public Choice 151:537–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldthorpe J (1980) Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Gottschalk P, Spolaore E (2002) On the evaluation of economic mobility. Rev Econ Stud 69:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harrison E, Seidl C (1994) Perceptional inequality and preferential judgements: an empirical examinationof distributional judgments. Public Choice 79:61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hirschman AO (1973) The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development (with a mathematical appendix by Michael Rothschild). Q J Econ 87:544–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Isaksson AS, Lindskog A (2009) Preferences for redistribution—a cross-country study in fairness. J Econ Behav Organ 72:884–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Konow J (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. J Econ Lit 41: 1188–1239Google Scholar
  48. Konow J (2009) Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice. Social Choice Welf 33:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krawczyk M (2010) A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: equality of opportunity and support for redistribution. J Public Econ 94:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krueger A (2012) The rise and consequences of inequality in the US. Presentation to the Center for American Progress, January 12th. (http://www.americanprogress.org/events/2012/01/12/17181/the-rise-and-consequences-of-inequality/)
  51. Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E, Stantcheva S (2013) How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiment. NBER Working Paper Series, n. 18865Google Scholar
  52. Loury G (1981) Intergenerational transfers and the distribution of earnings. Econometrica 49:843–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luttmer EFP, Singhal M (2011) Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. Am Econ J 3:157–179Google Scholar
  54. Mankiw G (2013) Observations on the great gatsby curve. Article published on Greg Mankiw’s Blog. (http://gregmankiw.blogspot.nl/2013/07/some-observations-on-great-gatsby-curve.html)
  55. Markandya A (1982) Intergenerational exchange mobility and economic welfare. Eur Econ Rev 17:301–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitra T, Ok EA (1998) The measurement of income mobility: a partial ordering approach. Econ Theory 12:77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. OECD (2011) Divided we stand: why inequality keeps rising. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Olivera J (2013) Preferences for redistribution in Europe. GINI Discussion Paper 67Google Scholar
  60. Piketty T (1995) Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q J Econ 110:551–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Prais S (1955) Measuring social mobility. J R Stat Soc Ser A 118:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  63. Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  64. Rogoff N (1953) Recent trends in occupational mobility. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  65. Shorrocks AF (1978) The measurement of mobility. Econometrica 46:1013–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stokey N (1998) Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves: the economic of social mobility. In: Schwartz NL, Jacobs D, Kalai E (eds) Frontiers of research in economic theory: the Nancy L. Schwartz memorial lectures 1983–1997. Econometric Society Monographs, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Traub S, Seidl C, Schmidt U, Levati M (2005) Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding—or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice. Social Choice Welf 24:283–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Traub S, Schmidt U (2009) An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferences. Eur Econ Rev 53:385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van de gaer D, Schokkaert E, Martinez M (2001) Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica 68:519–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yaari M, Bar-Hillel M (1984) On dividing justly. Social Choice Welf 1:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoram Amiel
    • 1
  • Michele Bernasconi
    • 2
  • Frank Cowell
    • 3
  • Valentino Dardanoni
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementRuppin Academic CenterEmek HeferIsrael
  2. 2.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversità Ca’ Foscari VeneziaVeneziaItaly
  3. 3.London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines (STICERD)LondonUK
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali e StatisticheUniversità di PalermoViale delle ScienzeItaly

Personalised recommendations