Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 659–674

The use of happiness research for public policy

Original Paper

Abstract

Research on happiness tends to follow a “benevolent dictator” approach where politicians pursue people’s happiness. This paper takes an antithetic approach based on the insights of public choice theory. First, we inquire how the results of happiness research may be used to improve the choice of institutions. Second, we show that the policy approach matters for the choice of research questions and the kind of knowledge happiness research aims to provide. Third, we emphasize that there is no shortcut to an optimal policy maximizing some happiness indicator or social welfare function since governments have an incentive to manipulate this indicator.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina A, Glaeser E, Sacerdote B (2005) Work and leisure in the United States and Europe: why so different?. NBER macroeconomics annual, vol 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–64Google Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1980) The power to tax. Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1986) The reason of rules: constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brickman P, Coates D, Bulman RJ (1978) Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative?. J Personal Soc Psychol 36(8): 917–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll N, Frijters P, Shields MA (2009) Quantifying the costs of drought: new evidence from life satisfaction data. J Popul Econ 22(2): 445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles KK (2004) Is retirement depressing? Labor force inactivity and psychological well-being in later life. In: Polachek SW (ed) Accounting for worker well-being. Research in Labor Economics 23. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dafflon B, Rossi S (1999) Public accounting fudges towards emu: a first empirical survey and some public choice considerations. Public Choice 101(1–2): 59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tella R, Haisken-De New J, MacCulloch R (2007) Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. NBER Working Paper No. W13159, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener E (2005) Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2008) Happiness: unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolan P, Metcalfe R (2008) Comparing willingness-to-pay and subjective well-being in the context of non-market goods. Centre for economic performance discussion Paper No. 0890, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 29(1): 94–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Easterlin RA (2010) Happiness, growth, and the life cycle. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical psychics: an essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman AM III (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey BS (2008) Happiness: a revolution in economics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey BS, Eichenberger R (1999) The new democratic federalism for Europe: functional, overlapping, and competing jurisdictions. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2000) Happiness, economy and institutions. Econ J 110(466): 918–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002a) What can economists learn from happiness research?. J Econ Lit 40(2): 402–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002b) Happiness and economics: how the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2006a) Direct democracy: designing a living constitution. In: Congleton R, Swedenborg B (eds) Democratic constitutional design and public policy, analysis and evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 39–80Google Scholar
  25. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2006b) Mispredicting utility and the political process. In: McCaffery EJ, Slemrod J (eds) Behavioral public finance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 113–140Google Scholar
  26. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2010) Happiness and public choice. Public Choice 144(3–4): 557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey BS, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2009) The life satisfaction approach to the value of public goods: the case of terrorism. Public Choice 138(3–4): 317–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frey BS, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2010) The life satisfaction approach to environmental valuation. Annu Rev Resour Econ 2: 139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregg P (1994) Out for the count: a social scientist’s analysis of unemployment statistics in the UK. J R Stat Soc A 157(2): 253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huppert FA, Marks N, Clark A, Siegrist J, Stutzer A, Vittersø J, Wahrendorf M (2009) Measuring well-being across Europe: description of the ESS well-being module and preliminary findings. Soc Indic Res 91(3): 301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL (1992) Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Econ Manage 22(1): 57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman D, Krueger AB (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 20(1): 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahneman D, Sugden R (2005) Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environ Resour Econ 32(1): 161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D, Diener, E, Schwarz, N (eds) (1999) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA (2004) Toward national well-being accounts. Am Econ Rev 94(2): 429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis-Beck MS, Paldam M (2000) Economic voting: an introduction. Elect Stud 19(2–3): 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loewenstein G, Ubel PA (2008) Hedonic adaptation and the role of decision and experience utility in public policy. J Public Econ 92(8–9): 1795–1810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luechinger S (2009) Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach. Econ J 119(536): 482–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luechinger S, Raschky PA (2009) Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach. J Public Econ 93(3–4): 620–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mueller DC (2003) Public Choice III. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Oreopoulos P (2007) Do dropouts drop out too soon? Wealth, health, and happiness from compulsory schooling. J Public Econ 91(11–12): 2213–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oswald AJ, Powdthavee N (2008) Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. J Public Econ 92(5–6): 1061–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Persson T, Tabellini G (2003) The economic effects of constitutions. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  46. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Stiglitz J, Sen AK, Fitoussi J-P (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr
  48. Stutzer A (2004) The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J Econ Behav Organ 54(1): 89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stutzer A (2009) Happiness when temptation overwhelms willpower. In: Dutt AK, Radcliff B (eds) Happiness, economics, and politics: toward a multi-disciplinary approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 97–126Google Scholar
  50. Stutzer A, Frey BS (2010) Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Soc Res 77(2): 679–714Google Scholar
  51. Theil H (1964) Optimal decision rules for government and industry. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Tinbergen J (1956) Economic policy: principles and design. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. van Praag BMS, Baarsma BE (2005) Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: the case of airport noise. Econ J 115(500): 224–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vournas Y (1999) Official statistics and the manipulation of conceptual and technical instruments: implications for research on social security. Radical Statistics 72Google Scholar
  55. Webster D (2002) Unemployment: how official statistics distort analysis and policy, and why. Radical Statistics 79/80Google Scholar
  56. Weisbach DA (2008) What does happiness research tell us about taxation?. J Legal Stud 37(S2): S293–S324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Welsch H (2006) Environment and happiness: valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecol Econ 58(4): 801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations