Abstract
We report on two field experiments on Approval Voting conducted during actual state and federal elections in Germany. Voters provided approval ballots both for named district candidates and for state parties. The data reveal significant discrepancies in the outcomes under the official method and Approval Voting. Further, our analysis suggests that currently used voting methods do a poor job of representing the electorate’s preferences. As a consequence, some recurring features of the political landscape in a given country might be, in part, an artifice of the employed voting method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcalde-Unzu J, Vorsatz M (2009) Size Approval Voting. J Econ Theory 144(3):1187–1210
Alós-Ferrer C (2006) A simple characterization of approval voting. Soc Choice Welf 27(3): 621–625
Alós-Ferrer C, Granić ÐG (2011) Political space representation with approval data: the German experience. University of Konstanz, Konstanz
Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven, London
Balinski M, Young HP (1982) Fair representation: meeting the ideal of one man, one vote. Yale University Press, New Haven
Baujard A, Igersheim H (2009) Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats. Rev Econ 60: 189–201
Baujard A, Igersheim H (2010) Framed field experiments on approval voting: lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French Presidential Elections. In: Laslier JF, Sanver MR (eds) Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1978) Approval voting. Am Political Sci Rev 72(3): 831–847
Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1988) Does approval voting elect the lowest common denominator?. PS Political Sci Politics 21: 277–284
Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (2001) A nail-biting election. Soc Choice Welf 18(3): 408–414
Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (2005) Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting. Soc Choice Welf 25(2): 457–474
Brams SJ, Kilgour DM (2010) Satisfaction approval voting. MPRA Paper 22709, University Library of Munich, Munich
Brams SJ, Kilgour DM, Sanver MR (2007) A minimax procedure for electing committees. Public Choice 132(3–4): 401–420
Fishburn PC (1978a) Axioms for approval voting: direct proof. J Econ Theory 19(1): 180–185
Fishburn PC (1978) Symmetric and consistent aggregation with dichotomous voting. In: Laffont JJ (eds) Aggregation and revelation of preferences. Amsterdam, North-Holland
Gibbard A (1973) Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 41(4): 587–601
Kilgour DM (2010) Approval balloting in multi-winner elections. In: Laslier JF, Sanver MR (eds) Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Kriesi H, Lachat R, Selb P, Bornschier S, Helbling M (2005) Der Aufstieg der SVP. Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung
Laslier JF (2006) Spatial approval voting. Political Anal 14: 160–185
Laslier JF, Van der Straeten K (2004) Election présidentielle: une expérience pour un autre mode de scrutin. Rev Fr Sci Polit 54: 99–130
Laslier JF, Van der Straeten K (2008) A live experiment on approval voting. Exp Econ 11(1): 97–105
Saari DG (1994) The geometry of voting. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Satterthwaite MA (1975) Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J Econ Theory 10(2): 187–217
Wolitzky A (2009) Fully sincere voting. Games Econ Behav 67: 720–735
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alós-Ferrer, C., Granić, ÐG. Two field experiments on Approval Voting in Germany. Soc Choice Welf 39, 171–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0550-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0550-5