Essential alternatives and freedom rankings
- 113 Downloads
We study the problem of ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. The analysis is based on the notion of essential alternatives introduced in Puppe (J Econ Theory 68:174–199, 1996). An alternative in an opportunity set is called essential if by deleting it, the reduced opportunity set offers less freedom than the original set. We provide an axiomatic characterization of the ranking according to which an opportunity set offers more freedom than another opportunity set if its share of essential elements in their union is larger.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dowding K, van Hees M (2009) Freedom of choice. In: Anand P, Pattanaik PK, Puppe C (eds) Handbook of rational and social choice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Foster J (1992) Notes on effective freedom, mimeographedGoogle Scholar
- Gravel N (1994) Can a ranking of opportunity sets attach an intrinsic importance to freedom of choice?. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 84: 454–458Google Scholar
- Nehring K, Puppe C (2010a) Diversity as a metric of freedom, mimeographedGoogle Scholar
- Nehring K, Puppe C (2010b) How much choice? mimeographedGoogle Scholar
- Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (1990) On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Rech Econ Louvain 56: 383–390Google Scholar
- Sen AK (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Sen AK (1991) Welfare, preference and freedom. J Econ 50: 15–29Google Scholar
- van Hees M (2008) The specific value of freedom. Soc Choice Welf (this volume)Google Scholar