Freedom of choice and expected compromise
- 76 Downloads
This article develops a new measure of freedom of choice based on the proposal that a set offers more freedom of choice than another if, and only if, the expected degree of dissimilarity between a random alternative from the set of possible alternatives and the most similar offered alternative in the set is smaller. Furthermore, a version of this measure is developed, which is able to take into account the values of the possible options.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow KJ (1995) A note on freedom and flexibility. In: Basu K, Pattanaik PK, Suzumura K (eds) Choice, welfare and development: a festschrift in honour of Amartya K. Sen. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 7–15Google Scholar
- Koopmans TC (1964) On flexibility of future preference. In: Shelly MW, Bryan GL (eds) Human judgments & optimality. Wiley, New York, pp 243–254Google Scholar
- Pattanaik PK, Xu Y (1990) On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Rech Econ Louvain 56(3–4): 383–390Google Scholar
- Sen A (1990) Welfare, freedom and social choice: a reply. Rech Econ Louvain 56(3–4): 451–485Google Scholar
- Sen A (1993) Markets and freedoms: achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Econ Papers 45(4): 519–541Google Scholar