Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 603–617 | Cite as

Balanced allocation methods for claims problems with indivisibilities

Original Paper

Abstract

We study claims problems in which a certain amount of indivisible units (of an homogeneous good) has to be distributed among a group of agents, when this amount is not enough to fully satisfy agents’ demands. Our aim is to find solutions fulfilling procedural and fairness properties. To do that, we define the M-down methods, which are the unique robust (composition down and consistency) and fair (balancedness and conditional full compensation) rules. Besides, we also establish the relationship between these M-down methods and the constrained equal awards rule.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balinski ML, Young HP (1977) On Huntington methods of apportionment. SIAM J Appl Math 33:607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chun Y (1999) Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems. Intl J Game Theory 28:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42:307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herrero C, Villar A (2002) Sustainability in bankruptcy problems. TOP 10:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moulin H (2000) Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods. Econometrica 68:643–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moulin H (2002) Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharing. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Moulin H, Stong R (2002) Fair queuing and other probabilistic allocation methods. Math Operat Res 27:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomson W (1998) Consistency and its converse: an introduction. Rochester Center for Economics Research, 448Google Scholar
  9. Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45:249–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yeh CH (2006) Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: a note. Social Choice and Welfare 27:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Young HP (1994) Equity: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico and Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones EconómicasUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsPablo de Olavide UniversitySevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations