Advertisement

Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 385–399 | Cite as

Analyzing the impact of indirect tax reforms on rank-dependent social welfare functions: a positional dominance approach

  • Paul MakdissiEmail author
  • Stéphane Mussard
Original Paper

Abstract

A new approach is developed to identify marginal tax reforms for pairs of commodities and to test for the robustness of their impacts on Yaari’s dual social welfare functions. The rank-dependent social evaluation approach gives rise to a new device, the s-concentration curve, which is a generalization of the standard concentration curve. The s-concentration curves are provided for every order of positional dominance and an illustration is performed using Canadian data.

Keywords

Concentration Curve Econ Theory Stochastic Dominance Social Welfare Function Lorenz Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaberge R (2000) Characterizations of Lorenz curves and income distributions. Soc Choice Welf 17:639–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaberge R (2004) Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Working Paper No. 45, CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besley T, Kanbur R (1988) Food subsidies and poverty alleviation. Econo J 98:701–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chateauneuf A, Gajdos T, Wilthien P-H (2002) The principle of strong diminishing transfer. J Econ Theory 103:311–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalton H (1920) The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Econ J 30:348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson R, Duclos J-Y (2000) Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68(6):1435–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson D, Weymark JA (1980), A single parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J Econ Theory 22:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P (2004) Restricted and unrestricted dominance for welfare, inequality and poverty Orderings. J. Public Econ Theory 6(1):145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2004) Socially-improving tax reforms. MimeoGoogle Scholar
  11. Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2005) Poverty-dominant transfer programs: the role of targeting and allocation rules. J Develop Econ 77:53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishburn PC, Willig RD (1984) Transfer principles in income redistribution. J Public Econ 25:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gajdos T (2002) Measuring inequalities without linearity in envy: Choquet integrals for symmetric capacities. J Econ Theory 106:190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1929) Some simple inequalities satisfied by convex functions. Messeng Math 58:145–152Google Scholar
  15. Kakwani NC (1980) On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica 48:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King MA (1983) Welfare analysis of tax reforms using household data. J Public Econ 21:183–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolm SC (1976a) Unequal inequlities I. J Econ Theory 12:416–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolm SC (1976b) Unequal inequlities II. J Econ Theory 13:82–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert PJ (2001) The distribution and redistribution of income, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2002) Consumption dominance curves: testing for the impact of indirect tax reforms on poverty. Econ Lett 75:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayshar J, Yitzhaki S (1995) Dalton-improving tax reforms. Ame Econ Rev 85(4):793–807Google Scholar
  22. Mehran F (1976) Linear measures of income inequality. Econometrica 44:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pen J (1971) Income distribution: facts, theories, policies. Preaeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Pigou AC (1912) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Wildasin DE (1984) On public good provision with distortionary taxation. Econ Inquiry 22:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yaari ME (1988) A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J Econ Theory 44:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yitzhaki S, Slemrod J (1991) Welfare dominance: an application to commodity taxation. Am Econ Rev 81:480–496Google Scholar
  29. Yitzhaki S, Thirsk W (1990) Welfare dominance and the design of excise taxation in the Côte d’Ivoire. J Develo Econ 33:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.CEPS/INSTEAD LuxembourgDifferdangeLuxembourg
  3. 3.GRÉDIUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
  4. 4.GEREM, Département des Sciences EconomiquesUniversité de PerpignanPerpignan CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations