Social Choice and Welfare

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 25–28 | Cite as

Mixed Strategies in Games of Capacity Manipulation in Hospital–Intern Markets

Original Paper

Abstract

We investigate games of capacity manipulation in hospital-intern markets as proposed by Konishi and Ünver (Soc Choice Welfare, in press). While Konishi and Ünver (Soc Choice Welfare, in press) show that there may not exist a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in general, there exists a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in such a game. We show that every hospital weakly prefers a Nash equilibrium to any “larger” capacity profiles, whether the equilibrium is in pure or mixed strategies. In particular, a Nash equilibrium is weakly preferred by hospitals to the outcome that results from truthful reporting.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Mixed Strategy Stable Match Marriage Problem Truthful Reporting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdulkadiroğlu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2005) The New York City high school match. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 95:364–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gale D, Shapley L (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Konishi H, Ünver U (2005) Games of capacity manipulation in hospital–intern markets. Soc Choice Welfare (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Nash JF (1951) Noncooperative games. Ann Math 54:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Roth AE (1984a) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J Polit Econ 92:991–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Roth AE (1984b) Misrepresentation and stability in the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 34:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Roth AE (1985) The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 27:75–96Google Scholar
  8. Roth AE (1991) A natural experiment in the organization of entry level labor markets: regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the U. K. Am Econ Rev 81:415–440Google Scholar
  9. Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of matching markets for American physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89:748–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roth AE, Sotomayor MO (1990) Two-sided matching: a study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Sönmez T (1997) Manipulation via capacities in two-sided matching markets. J Econ Theory 77:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sönmez T (1999) Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets? J Econ Theory 86:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations