New Generation Computing

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 209–225 | Cite as

If You Like the Devil Wears Prada the Book, Will You also Enjoy the Devil Wears Prada the Movie? A Study of Cross-Domain Recommendations



To date, the majority of recommender systems (RSs) work on a single domain, such as exclusively for movies, books, etc. However, human preferences may span across multiple domains. Hence, consumption behaviors on related items from different domains can be useful to inform RS to make recommendations. This paper reports our efforts on uncovering the association between user preferences on related items across domains. In addition, we have also tested collaborative filtering technique on our cross-domain dataset for which results are reported here.


Recommendation Collaborative Filtering Cross Domain 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A., “Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: a Survey of the State-of-the-art and Possible Extension,” IEEE Trans. Know. and Data Eng. 17, 6, pp. 734-749, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balabanovic, M. and Shoham, Y., “Fab: Content-based Collaborative Recommendation,” CACM 40, 3, pp. 66-72, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, A., Hewer, P. and Howcroft, B., “An Exposition of Consumer Behavior in the Financial Services Industry,” Int’l J. Bank Marketing 18, 1, pp. 15-26, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkovsky, S., Kuflik, T and Ricci, F., “Entertainment Personalization Mechanism through Cross-domain User Modeling,” in Proc. 1st Int’l Conf. Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, LNAI 3814, pp. 215-219, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M., “User Modeling for Adaptive News Access,” User Modeling and User-Adaptive Interaction 10, 2-3, pp. 147-180, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D. and Kadie, C., “Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering,” in Proc. 14th Int’l Conf. Uncertainty in AI, pp. 43-52, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, R., “Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments,” User Modeling and User Adaptive Interaction 12, 4, pp. 331-370, 2002.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cawley, G.C., and Talbot, N.L.C., “Efficient Leave-one-out Cross-validation of Kernel Fisher Discriminant Classifiers,” Pattern Recognition 36, 1, pp. 2585-2592, 2003.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claypool, M., Gokhale, A., Miranda, T., Murnikov, P., Netes, D. and Sartin, M., “Combining Content-based and Collaborative Filters in an Online Newspaper,” in Workshop on Recommender system, in conjunction to SIGIR’99, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Dietterich, T.G., “Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms,” Neural Computation 10, pp. 1895-1923, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S. and White, T., “Evaluating Implicit Measures to Improve Web Search,” ACM Trans. Inf. Sys. 23, pp. 147-168, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Borchers, A. and Riedl, J., “An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering,” in Proc. 22nd Annual Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’99), pp. 230-237, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J., “Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems,” ACM Trans. Inf. Sys. 22, 1, pp. 5-53, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joachims, T., Freitag, D. and Mitchell, T., “WebWatcher: A Tour Guide for the World Wide Web,” in Proc. 15th Int’l Joint Conf. on AI (IJCAI’97), pp. 770-775, 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Konstan, J.A.,Miller,B.N., Maltz, D.,Herlocker, J.L.,Gordon, L. R. and Riedl, J., “GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News,” CACM 40, 3, pp. 77-87, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. Lariviere, B. and Van den Poel, D., “Investigating the Role of Product Features in Preventing Customer Churn by Using Survival Analysis and Choice Modeling: the Case of Financial Services,” Expert Sys. with Applications 27, pp. 277-285, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lekakos, G. and Giaglis, G., “Improving the Prediction Accuracy of Recommendation Algorithms: Approaches Anchored on Human Factors,” Interacting with Computers 18, 3, pp. 410-431, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Y., Liu, L., and Li, X., “A Hybrid Collaborative Filtering Method for Multiple-interests and Multiple-content Recommendation in E-Commerce,” Expert Sys. with Applications 28, pp. 67-77, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Niedere, C., Stewart, A., Mehta, B. and Hemmje, M., “A Multi-dimensional, Unified User Model for Cross-system Personalization,” Workshop on environments for personalized information access, in conjunction to AVI’2004, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Pazzani, P., “A Framework for Collaborative, Content-Based and Demographic Filtering,” AI Review 13, 5-6, pp. 393-408, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. Ratneshwar, S., Pechmann, C. and Shocker, A.D., “Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration,” J. Consumer Res. 23, 3, pp. 240-250, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schein, A., Popescul, A., Ungar, L.H. and Pennock, D., “Methods and Metrics for Cold-start Recommendations,” in Proc. 25th annual Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’02), 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P., “Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating ’Word of Mouth’,” in Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Sys., (ACM CHI’1995), pp. 210-217, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Tang, T.Y., Winoto, P. and Chan, K.C.C., “Scaling Down Candidate Sets Based on the Temporal Feature of Items for Improved Hybrid Recommendations,” in Intelligent Techniques in Web Personalization (B. Mobasher and S. S. Anand Eds.), LNAI 3169, pp. 169-185, 2004.Google Scholar
  25. “Wiki on Cross-selling,”
  26. Worthington, S. and Horne, S., “A New Relationship Marketing Model and Its Application in the Affinity Credit Card Market,” Int’l J. Bank Marketing 16, 1, pp. 39-44, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu, L., Liu, L., Li, J. and Li, Z., “Modeling User Multiple Interests by an Improved GCS Approach,” Expert Sys. with Applications 29, pp. 757-767, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ohmsha, Ltd. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceKonkuk Univ.KonkukKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of ComputingHong Kong Polytechnic Univ.Kowloon, Hong KongChina

Personalised recommendations