New Generation Computing

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 145–169 | Cite as

On the Use of Virtual Animals with Artificial Fear in Virtual Environments

  • Carlos Delgado-Mata
  • Jesus Ibanez Martinez
  • Simon Bee
  • Rocio Ruiz-Rodarte
  • Ruth Aylett
Article

Abstract

Virtual environments are often static and empty of life. One way of combating this problem is by populating the environment with autonomous agents that behave in a life-like manner. This paper discusses the incorporation of animals into such environments and the definition of appropriate behaviours that enrich the experience. Reynolds’ flocking algorithm is extended to incorporate the effects of emotions, in this case fear. Deer are used as an example of flocking mammals and an autonomous agent architecture with an action selection mechanism incorporating the effects of emotion is linked to the extended flocking rules. Olfaction is used to transmit emotion between animals, through pheromones modelled as particles in a free expansion gas. Two experiments are reported that provide some insight into the impact of the various behaviours. The combination of reaction and naturalistic behaviours are concluded to be important in enhancing the virtual environment.

Keywords

Artificial Animals Emotional Architecture Virtual Environments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baerends, G.P., “The Functional Organization of Behaviour,” Animal Behaviour 24, pp. 726-738, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumberg, B., “Action-selection in Hamsterdam: Lessons from Ethology,” in Proc. of the Third International Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Brighton, England, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, R., “Artificial Life - from Robot Dreams to Reality..,” Nature 406, pp. 945-947, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canamero, D., “A Hormonal Model of Emotions for Behavior Control,” Research Report VUB AI-Memo 97-6, Free University of Brussels, Belgium, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damasio, A., Descartes’ Error:Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Papermac, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawkins, R., Hierarchical Organisation: A Candidate Principle for Ethology, Growing Points in Ethology (Bateson & Hinde, ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delgado-Mata, C. and Aylett, R., “From Robots to Creatures: Extending a Robot Behaviour based Architecture to Create Virtual Creatures,” in Proc. of ISRA 2000 (Monterrey, Mexico) (Mayorga, R. ed.), IT Monterrey, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delgado-Mata, C., Ibanez, J and Aylett, R., “Let’s Run for It: Conspecic Emotional Flocking Triggered via Virtual Pheromones,” LNCS Smart Graphics 2003, (Butz, A., Krüger, A. and Oliver, P. eds.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 131-140, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delgado-Mata, C., Ruiz-Rodarte, R., Aylett, R.S., Perez-Cisneros, M.A. and Cook, P.A., “Illusion of Life in Palenque: Communicating Emotions inside a Virtual Environment for Maya Cultural Heritage,” PRICAI: Seventh Pacic Rim Intl Conf. on Articial Intelligence, Tokyo, Japan, (Prendinger, H. ed.), PRICAI, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flake, G.W., The Computational Beauty of Nature: Computer Explorations of Fractals, Chaos, Complex Systems, and Adaptation, MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grammer, K., “5-alpha-androst-16en-3alpha-one: a Male Pheromone?,” Ethology and Sociobiology 14-3, pp. 201-207, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gratch, J. and Marsella, S., “Evaluating a General Model of Emotional Appraisal and Coping, Architectures for Modeling Emotion: Cross Disciplinary Foundations,” 2004 Spring Symposium, Menlo Park, California, (Hudlicka, E. and Canamero, L. eds.), American Association for Articial Intelligence, pp. 52-59, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heeter, C., “Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1-2, pp. 262-271, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoorn, J.F., Konjin, E.A. and Van der Veer, G.C., “Virtual Reality: Do not Augment Realism, Augment Relevance,” Upgrade -Human-Computer Interaction: Overcoming Barriers 4-1, pp. 18-26, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Izard, C.E., “Four Systems for Emotion Activation: Cognitive and Noncognitive Processes,” Psychological Review 100-1, pp. 68-90, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitchell, A., Lynn, S. and Vafai, S., “10 Smell Myths: Uncovering the Stinkin’ Truth,” Tech. Report, Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langton, C., Artificial life: An Overview, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall, D.A., Blumer, L. and Moulton, D.G. “Odor Detection Curves for n-pentanoic Acid in Dogs and Humans,” Chemical Senses 6, pp. 445-453, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mendao, M., “Hormonally Moderated Neural Control, Architectures for Modeling Emotion: Cross Disciplinary Foundations,” the 2004 Spring Symposium (Menlo Park, California) (Hudlicka, E. and Canamero, L. eds.), American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 92-95, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mery, F., The Life, History and Magic of the Dog, Grosset & Dunlap, New York, USA, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Minsky, M., The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, New York, USA, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montes-Gonzalez, F.M., An Action Selection Mechanism based on Vertebrate Basal Ganglia, Ph.D. Thesis, Psychology Department, University of Sheffield, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neary, M., “Sheep Sense,” The Working Border Collie, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L. and Collins, A., The Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge University Press, USA, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parent, R., Computer Animation: Algorithms and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Picard, R., Affective Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reeves, W.T. “Particle Systems - a Technique for Modeling a Class of Fuzzy Objects,” Siggraph 1983, ACM, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reynolds, C.W., “Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model,” Computer Graphics 21-4, pp. 25-34, 1987.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenblatt, J.K. and Payton, D.W., “A Fine-grained Alternative to the Subsumption Architecture for Mobile Robot Control,” Proc. of the IEEE/INNS International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks (Washington DC), vol. 2, pp. 317-324, 1989Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tinbergen, N., The Study of Instinct, Oxford University Press, U K, 1969.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tyrrell, T., Computational Mechanisms for Action Selection, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ulicny, B. and Thalmann, D., “Crowd Simulation for Virtual Heritage,” Proc. of the First Workshop on 3D Virtual Heritage (Geneva), pp. 28-32, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Velasquez, J., “Modeling Emotions and Other Motivations in Synthetic Agents,” Proc. of the Fourteenth National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97) (Providence, RI), MIT/AAAI Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Witmer, B.G. and Singer, M.J., “Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7-3, pp. 225-240, 1998.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wyatt, T.W., Pheromones and Animal Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambrigde, U.K., 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

©  2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Delgado-Mata
    • 1
  • Jesus Ibanez Martinez
    • 2
  • Simon Bee
    • 3
  • Rocio Ruiz-Rodarte
    • 4
  • Ruth Aylett
    • 5
  1. 1.CINAVIUniversidad BonaterraAguascalientesMexico
  2. 2.Departament of TechnologyUniversity Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.LightWork Design Ltd.SheffieldUK
  4. 4.Instituto Tecnologico de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyMexicoMexico
  5. 5.School of Mathematical and Computer SciencesHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations