Skip to main content
Log in

Measurements of freestream density fluctuations in a hypersonic wind tunnel

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Density disturbances in the freestream of the University of Southern Queensland’s Mach 6 wind tunnel (\(\rho _{\infty } \approx {34\, \hbox {gm}^{-3}}\)) have been measured using a focused laser differential interferometer (FLDI). The direct contribution of the turbulent shear layer from the Mach 6 nozzle to the FLDI signal was largely eliminated by mechanically shielding the FLDI beams from these effects. This improvement significantly enhanced the low wavenumber FLDI spectra which allowed a von Kármán spectrum fit and demonstrated a \(-5/3\) roll-off in the inertial subrange and enabled the identification of the integral length scale (28–29 mm). The normalised root-mean-square density fluctuations were found to change over the flow duration (typically between 0.4 and \(0.6\%\)) for the 1–250 kHz frequency range which corresponds to the wavenumber range of 6– 1600  \({\mathrm{m}}^{-1}\) in this Mach 6 flow. Previous disturbance measurements using intrusive methods have identified a narrowband 3–4 kHz disturbance that is first measured in the core flow about 65 ms after the flow begins and remains until the flow terminates. The onset of this narrowband disturbance was previously correlated with transition-to-turbulence in the subsonic test gas supply to the nozzle. This correlation was investigated further herein, and the 3–4 kHz feature was inferred to be entropy mode disturbances by showing the departure of the FLDI measurements from Pitot pressure measurements. Through the comparison of FLDI and Pitot pressure data, Pitot pressure probes were demonstrated to produce a poor estimate of the static pressure fluctuations when non-isentropic disturbances are non-negligible.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Penn State supersonic wind tunnel.

  2. Arnold Engineering Development Complex hypervelocity wind tunnel 9.

References

  • Birch B, Buttsworth D, Choudhury R, Stern N (2018) Characterization of a Ludwieg tube with free piston compression heating in Mach 6 configuration. In: 22nd AIAA international space planes and hypersonics systems and technologies conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5266

  • Birch BJC (2019) Characterisation of the USQ hypersonic ffacility freestream. PhD thesis, The University of Southern Queensland

  • Buttsworth DR (2010) Ludwieg tunnel facility with free piston compression heating for supersonic and hypersonic testing. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australian space science conference, National Space Society of Australia Ltd., pp 153–162

  • Chou A, Leidy A, King RA, Bathel BF, Herring G (2018) Measurements of freestream fluctuations in the NASA Langley 20-inch Mach 6 tunnel. In: (2018) Fluid dynamics conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3073

  • Duan L, Choudhari MM, Chou A, Munoz F, Radespiel R, Schilden T, Schröder W, Marineau EC, Casper KM, Chaudhry RS, Candler GV, Gray KA, Schneider SP (2019) Characterization of freestream disturbances in conventional hypersonic wind tunnels. J Spacecr Rocket 56(2):357–368. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a34290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulghum MR (2014) Turbulence measurements in high-speed wind tunnels using focused laser differential interferometry. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University

  • Jewell JS, Parziale NJ, Lam KL, Hagen BJ, Kimmel RL (2016) Disturbance and phase speed measurements for shock tubes and hypersonic boundary-layer instability. In: 32nd AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3112

  • Kolmogorov AN (1941) The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. C R Acad Sci URSS 30:301–305

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kovásznay L (1953) Turbulence in supersonic flow. J Aeronaut Sci 20(10):657–674. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2793

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parziale N, Shepherd J, Hornung H (2012) Reflected shock tunnel noise measurement by focused differential interferometry. In: 42nd AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3261

  • Parziale N, Shepherd J, Hornung H (2013) Differential interferometric measurement of instability in a hypervelocity boundary layer. AIAA J 51(3):750–754. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j052013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parziale N, Shepherd J, Hornung H (2014) Free-stream density perturbations in a reflected-shock tunnel. Exp Fluids 55(2):1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1665-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson S (2005) Simple, adjustable beam splitting element for differential interferometer based on photoelastic birefringence of a prismatic bar. Rev Sci Instrum 76(11):113703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2132271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt BE, Shepherd JE (2015) Analysis of focused laser differential interferometry. Appl Opt 54(28):8459–8472. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.54.008459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SP (2008) Development of hypersonic quiet tunnels. J Spacecr Rocket 45(4):641–664. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles GS, Fulghum MR (2016) The focusing laser differential interferometer, an instrument for localized turbulence measurements in refractive flows. J Fluids Eng 138(10):101402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainback P, Wagner R (1972) A comparison of disturbance levels measured in hypersonic tunnels using a hot-wire anemometer and a pitot pressure probe. In: 7th Aerodynamic testing conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1972-1003

  • Wagner A, Schülein E, Petervari R, Hannemann K, Ali SRC, Cerminara A, Sandham ND (2018) Combined free-stream disturbance measurements and receptivity studies in hypersonic wind tunnels by means of a slender wedge probe and direct numerical simulation. J Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Byrenn Birch was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byrenn Birch.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birch, B., Buttsworth, D. & Zander, F. Measurements of freestream density fluctuations in a hypersonic wind tunnel. Exp Fluids 61, 158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02992-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02992-w

Navigation